These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3656536)
1. Cytological grading of prostatic aspiration biopsy: a comparison with the Gleason grading system. Layfield LJ; Mukamel E; Hilborne LH; Hannah JB; Glasgow BJ; Ljung BM; deKernion JB J Urol; 1987 Oct; 138(4):798-800. PubMed ID: 3656536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of Gleason grading system in comparing prostate biopsies with total prostatectomy specimens. Babaian RJ; Grunow WA Urology; 1985 Jun; 25(6):564-7. PubMed ID: 4012946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma in needle biopsies vs. radical prostatectomy specimens. Mazzucchelli R; Barbisan F; Tarquini LM; Filosa A; Campanini N; Galosi AB Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2005 Jun; 27(3):125-33. PubMed ID: 16121633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usual and unusual histologic patterns of high Gleason score 8 to 10 adenocarcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy tissue. Gottipati S; Warncke J; Vollmer R; Humphrey PA Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):900-7. PubMed ID: 22367295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors. Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The value of cytological grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Comparison of the clinical state, the Gleason score and grade in 69 cases]. Piaton E; Mouriquand J; Berger N; Mouriquand P; Seigneurin D; Devonec M; Perrin P J Urol (Paris); 1990; 96(4):211-6. PubMed ID: 2212719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of Gleason system use on different types of prostatic tissue samples. Pleşea IE; Zaharia B; Enache SD; Mitroi G; Tomescu P; Pop OT; Badea P; Kozokić A Rom J Morphol Embryol; 1999-2004; 45():25-34. PubMed ID: 15847376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gleason histologic grading of prostatic carcinoma. Correlations between biopsy and prostatectomy specimens. Mills SE; Fowler JE Cancer; 1986 Jan; 57(2):346-9. PubMed ID: 3942967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparisons of histological grading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens in prostatic adenocarcinoma]. Fujinami K; Satomi Y; Sugawara T; Ikeda I; Ohgo Y; Harada M Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Sep; 86(9):1460-5. PubMed ID: 7474635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidental carcinoma of the prostate: significance of staging transurethral resection. Carroll PR; Leitner TC; Yen TS; Watson RA; Williams RD J Urol; 1985 May; 133(5):811-4. PubMed ID: 3989921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer. Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radical prostatectomy for impalpable prostate cancer: the Johns Hopkins experience with tumors found on transurethral resection (stages T1A and T1B) and on needle biopsy (stage T1C). Epstein JI; Walsh PC; Brendler CB J Urol; 1994 Nov; 152(5 Pt 2):1721-9. PubMed ID: 7523719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer on prostatectomy specimens: can high grade tumor be predicted preoperatively? Rubin MA; Mucci NR; Manley S; Sanda M; Cushenberry E; Strawderman M; Montie JE; Bassily NH J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 11125378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Discrepancy between Gleason scores of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. Köksal IT; Ozcan F; Kadioglu TC; Esen T; Kiliçaslan I; Tunç M Eur Urol; 2000 Jun; 37(6):670-4. PubMed ID: 10828666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation between the Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens. Shen BY; Tsui KH; Chang PL; Chuang CK; Hsieh ML; Huang ST; Wang TM; Lee SH; Huang HC; Huang SC Chang Gung Med J; 2003 Dec; 26(12):919-24. PubMed ID: 15008327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Heterogeneity of Gleason grade in multifocal adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Arora R; Koch MO; Eble JN; Ulbright TM; Li L; Cheng L Cancer; 2004 Jun; 100(11):2362-6. PubMed ID: 15160339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of fine needle aspiration and core biopsy in diagnosis and preoperative grading of prostate cancer. Narayan P; Jajodia P; Stein R; Tanagho EA J Urol; 1989 Mar; 141(3):560-3. PubMed ID: 2918592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The value of the modified Gleason grading system of prostate adenocarcinoma in routine urological diagnostics]. Helpap B; Egevad L Urologe A; 2007 Jan; 46(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 17111167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy. Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]