These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3656538)

  • 1. Potency following radical prostatectomy with wide unilateral excision of the neurovascular bundle.
    Walsh PC; Epstein JI; Lowe FC
    J Urol; 1987 Oct; 138(4):823-7. PubMed ID: 3656538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The New York University nerve sparing algorithm decreases the rate of positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Shah O; Robbins DA; Melamed J; Lepor H
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2147-52. PubMed ID: 12771737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radical prostatectomy, preservation of sexual function, cancer control. The controversy.
    Walsh PC
    Urol Clin North Am; 1987 Nov; 14(4):663-73. PubMed ID: 3314061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Association of surgeon subjective characterization of nerve sparing quality with potency following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Levinson AW; Pavlovich CP; Ward NT; Link RE; Mettee LZ; Su LM
    J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1510-4. PubMed ID: 18295270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual function following radical prostatectomy: influence of preservation of neurovascular bundles.
    Quinlan DM; Epstein JI; Carter BS; Walsh PC
    J Urol; 1991 May; 145(5):998-1002. PubMed ID: 2016818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of results after 250 patients.
    Catalona WJ; Bigg SW
    J Urol; 1990 Mar; 143(3):538-43; discussion 544. PubMed ID: 2304166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Erectile Function Recovery after Radical Prostatectomy in Men with High Risk Features.
    Recabal P; Assel M; Musser JE; Caras RJ; Sjoberg DD; Coleman JA; Mulhall JP; Parra RO; Scardino PT; Touijer K; Eastham JA; Laudone VP
    J Urol; 2016 Aug; 196(2):507-13. PubMed ID: 26905018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of surgical approach (nerve bundle preservation versus wide local excision) on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
    Ward JF; Zincke H; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Myers RP; Blute ML
    J Urol; 2004 Oct; 172(4 Pt 1):1328-32. PubMed ID: 15371834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for clinical stage B2 prostate cancer.
    Bigg SW; Kavoussi LR; Catalona WJ
    J Urol; 1990 Dec; 144(6):1420-4. PubMed ID: 1700156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: extraprostatic tumor extension and preservation of erectile function.
    Catalona WJ; Dresner SM
    J Urol; 1985 Dec; 134(6):1149-51. PubMed ID: 4057407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations.
    Walsh PC; Lepor H; Eggleston JC
    Prostate; 1983; 4(5):473-85. PubMed ID: 6889192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radical prostatectomy and cystoprostatectomy with preservation of potency. Results using a new nerve-sparing technique.
    Walsh PC; Mostwin JL
    Br J Urol; 1984 Dec; 56(6):694-7. PubMed ID: 6534493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of wide excision of the neurovascular bundle(s) on prognosis in men with clinically localized prostate cancer with established capsular penetration.
    Partin AW; Borland RN; Epstein JI; Brendler CB
    J Urol; 1993 Jul; 150(1):142-6; discussion 146-8. PubMed ID: 8510234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neuroanatomical approach to radical cystoprostatectomy with preservation of sexual function.
    Schlegel PN; Walsh PC
    J Urol; 1987 Dec; 138(6):1402-6. PubMed ID: 3682067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Excision of the neurovascular bundle at radical prostatectomy in cases with perineural invasion on needle biopsy.
    Holmes GF; Walsh PC; Pound CR; Epstein JI
    Urology; 1999 Apr; 53(4):752-6. PubMed ID: 10197851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: pathological findings in the first 100 cases.
    Eggleston JC; Walsh PC
    J Urol; 1985 Dec; 134(6):1146-8. PubMed ID: 4057406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of radical prostatectomy capsular margins of resection. The significance of margins designated as negative, closely approaching, and positive.
    Epstein JI
    Am J Surg Pathol; 1990 Jul; 14(7):626-32. PubMed ID: 2356922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impotence Following Radical Prostatectomy: Insight into Etiology and Prevention.
    Walsh PC; Donker PJ
    J Urol; 2017 Feb; 197(2S):S165-S170. PubMed ID: 28012765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Current results and patient selection for nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Steiner MS
    Semin Urol Oncol; 1995 Aug; 13(3):204-14. PubMed ID: 8521134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utility of intraoperative frozen section analysis of surgical margins in region of neurovascular bundles at radical prostatectomy.
    Goharderakhshan RZ; Sudilovsky D; Carroll LA; Grossfeld GD; Marn R; Carroll PR
    Urology; 2002 May; 59(5):709-14. PubMed ID: 11992845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.