182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3656538)
1. Potency following radical prostatectomy with wide unilateral excision of the neurovascular bundle.
Walsh PC; Epstein JI; Lowe FC
J Urol; 1987 Oct; 138(4):823-7. PubMed ID: 3656538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The New York University nerve sparing algorithm decreases the rate of positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Shah O; Robbins DA; Melamed J; Lepor H
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2147-52. PubMed ID: 12771737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radical prostatectomy, preservation of sexual function, cancer control. The controversy.
Walsh PC
Urol Clin North Am; 1987 Nov; 14(4):663-73. PubMed ID: 3314061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Association of surgeon subjective characterization of nerve sparing quality with potency following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Levinson AW; Pavlovich CP; Ward NT; Link RE; Mettee LZ; Su LM
J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1510-4. PubMed ID: 18295270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sexual function following radical prostatectomy: influence of preservation of neurovascular bundles.
Quinlan DM; Epstein JI; Carter BS; Walsh PC
J Urol; 1991 May; 145(5):998-1002. PubMed ID: 2016818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of results after 250 patients.
Catalona WJ; Bigg SW
J Urol; 1990 Mar; 143(3):538-43; discussion 544. PubMed ID: 2304166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Erectile Function Recovery after Radical Prostatectomy in Men with High Risk Features.
Recabal P; Assel M; Musser JE; Caras RJ; Sjoberg DD; Coleman JA; Mulhall JP; Parra RO; Scardino PT; Touijer K; Eastham JA; Laudone VP
J Urol; 2016 Aug; 196(2):507-13. PubMed ID: 26905018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of surgical approach (nerve bundle preservation versus wide local excision) on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
Ward JF; Zincke H; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Myers RP; Blute ML
J Urol; 2004 Oct; 172(4 Pt 1):1328-32. PubMed ID: 15371834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for clinical stage B2 prostate cancer.
Bigg SW; Kavoussi LR; Catalona WJ
J Urol; 1990 Dec; 144(6):1420-4. PubMed ID: 1700156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: extraprostatic tumor extension and preservation of erectile function.
Catalona WJ; Dresner SM
J Urol; 1985 Dec; 134(6):1149-51. PubMed ID: 4057407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations.
Walsh PC; Lepor H; Eggleston JC
Prostate; 1983; 4(5):473-85. PubMed ID: 6889192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radical prostatectomy and cystoprostatectomy with preservation of potency. Results using a new nerve-sparing technique.
Walsh PC; Mostwin JL
Br J Urol; 1984 Dec; 56(6):694-7. PubMed ID: 6534493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of wide excision of the neurovascular bundle(s) on prognosis in men with clinically localized prostate cancer with established capsular penetration.
Partin AW; Borland RN; Epstein JI; Brendler CB
J Urol; 1993 Jul; 150(1):142-6; discussion 146-8. PubMed ID: 8510234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neuroanatomical approach to radical cystoprostatectomy with preservation of sexual function.
Schlegel PN; Walsh PC
J Urol; 1987 Dec; 138(6):1402-6. PubMed ID: 3682067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Excision of the neurovascular bundle at radical prostatectomy in cases with perineural invasion on needle biopsy.
Holmes GF; Walsh PC; Pound CR; Epstein JI
Urology; 1999 Apr; 53(4):752-6. PubMed ID: 10197851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: pathological findings in the first 100 cases.
Eggleston JC; Walsh PC
J Urol; 1985 Dec; 134(6):1146-8. PubMed ID: 4057406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of radical prostatectomy capsular margins of resection. The significance of margins designated as negative, closely approaching, and positive.
Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 1990 Jul; 14(7):626-32. PubMed ID: 2356922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impotence Following Radical Prostatectomy: Insight into Etiology and Prevention.
Walsh PC; Donker PJ
J Urol; 2017 Feb; 197(2S):S165-S170. PubMed ID: 28012765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Current results and patient selection for nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Steiner MS
Semin Urol Oncol; 1995 Aug; 13(3):204-14. PubMed ID: 8521134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utility of intraoperative frozen section analysis of surgical margins in region of neurovascular bundles at radical prostatectomy.
Goharderakhshan RZ; Sudilovsky D; Carroll LA; Grossfeld GD; Marn R; Carroll PR
Urology; 2002 May; 59(5):709-14. PubMed ID: 11992845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
