These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3656538)

  • 21. Efficacy of first-generation Cavermap to verify location and function of cavernous nerves during radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional evaluation by experienced surgeons.
    Walsh PC; Marschke P; Catalona WJ; Lepor H; Martin S; Myers RP; Steiner MS
    Urology; 2001 Mar; 57(3):491-4. PubMed ID: 11248626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Antegrade approach to radical retropubic prostatectomy in patients with difficult apical dissection.
    Petros JA; Catalona WJ
    J Urol; 1991 May; 145(5):994-7. PubMed ID: 2016817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neurovascular bundle resection: does it improve the margins?
    Lepor H; Tareen B
    Urol Oncol; 2010; 28(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 20219562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Potency-sparing radical perineal prostatectomy].
    Jakse G; Brehmer B; Borchers H; Verger-Kuhnke A; Biesterfeld S
    Urologe A; 2003 Mar; 42(3):382-6. PubMed ID: 12671772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impacting factors for recovery of erectile function within 1 year following robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Ko WJ; Truesdale MD; Hruby GW; Landman J; Badani KK
    J Sex Med; 2011 Jun; 8(6):1805-12. PubMed ID: 21426493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hydrodissection of neurovascular bundles during open radical prostatectomy improves postoperative potency.
    Patel MI; Spernat D; Lopez-Corona E
    J Urol; 2011 Jul; 186(1):233-7. PubMed ID: 21575963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Intraoperative frozen section monitoring of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Cangiano TG; Litwin MS; Naitoh J; Dorey F; deKernion JB
    J Urol; 1999 Sep; 162(3 Pt 1):655-8. PubMed ID: 10458335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with clipless intrafascial neurovascular bundle-sparing approach: surgical technique and one-year functional and oncologic outcomes.
    Shin TY; Lee YS
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17595. PubMed ID: 33077779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intraoperative frozen section of the prostate decreases positive margin rate while ensuring nerve sparing procedure during radical prostatectomy.
    von Bodman C; Brock M; Roghmann F; Byers A; Löppenberg B; Braun K; Pastor J; Sommerer F; Noldus J; Palisaar RJ
    J Urol; 2013 Aug; 190(2):515-20. PubMed ID: 23415965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improving the preservation of the urethral sphincter and neurovascular bundles during open radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Montorsi F; Salonia A; Suardi N; Gallina A; Zanni G; Briganti A; Deho' F; Naspro R; Farina E; Rigatti P
    Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):938-45. PubMed ID: 16257111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Does a nerve-sparing technique or potency affect continence after open radical retropubic prostatectomy?
    Marien TP; Lepor H
    BJU Int; 2008 Dec; 102(11):1581-4. PubMed ID: 18808410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Site-specific positive margins at radical prostatectomy: assessing cancer-control benefits of wide excision of the neurovascular bundle on a side with cancer on biopsy.
    Park EL; Dalkin B; Escobar C; Nagle RB
    BJU Int; 2003 Feb; 91(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 12581008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Radical retropubic prostatectomy with reduced morbidity: an anatomic approach.
    Walsh PC
    NCI Monogr; 1988; (7):133-7. PubMed ID: 3173499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation and Laser-Doppler flowmetry during radical prostatectomy.
    Axelson HW; Johansson E; Bill-Axelson A
    J Sex Med; 2013 Nov; 10(11):2842-8. PubMed ID: 22909402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Factors predicting recovery of erections after radical prostatectomy.
    Rabbani F; Stapleton AM; Kattan MW; Wheeler TM; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2000 Dec; 164(6):1929-34. PubMed ID: 11061884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Recovery of Baseline Erectile Function in Men Following Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Analysis Using Validated Measures.
    Sridhar AN; Cathcart PJ; Yap T; Hines J; Nathan S; Briggs TP; Kelly JD; Minhas S
    J Sex Med; 2016 Mar; 13(3):435-43. PubMed ID: 26944466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intraoperative T staging in radical retropubic prostatectomy: is it reliable?
    Vaidya A; Hawke C; Tiguert R; Civantos F; Soloway M
    Urology; 2001 May; 57(5):949-54. PubMed ID: 11337301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Patient selection for, results of, and impact on tumor resection of potency-sparing radical prostatectomy.
    Catalona WJ
    Urol Clin North Am; 1990 Nov; 17(4):819-26. PubMed ID: 2219579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Extended followup of the influence of wide excision of the neurovascular bundle(s) on prognosis in men with clinically localized prostate cancer and extensive capsular perforation.
    Smith RC; Partin AW; Epstein JI; Brendler CB
    J Urol; 1996 Aug; 156(2 Pt 1):454-7; discussion 457-8. PubMed ID: 8683701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Technique of nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy].
    Graefen M; Huland H
    Urologe A; 2004 Feb; 43(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 14991116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.