218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36565497)
1. The next step for China's national park management: Integrating ecosystem services into space boundary delimitation.
Xue S; Fang Z; Bai Y; Alatalo JM; Yang Y; Zhang F
J Environ Manage; 2023 Mar; 329():117086. PubMed ID: 36565497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Boundary delineation and grading functional zoning of Sanjiangyuan National Park based on biodiversity importance evaluations.
Ma B; Zeng W; Xie Y; Wang Z; Hu G; Li Q; Cao R; Zhuo Y; Zhang T
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 825():154068. PubMed ID: 35217041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring ecosystem services and ecological sensitivity for comprehensive conservation in Giant Panda National Park.
Li C; Hou R; Bao Z; Wu W; Owens JR; Bi W; Xu Q; Gu X; Xiang Z; Qi D
Conserv Biol; 2024 Apr; 38(2):e14215. PubMed ID: 37990845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Habitat quality dynamics in China's first group of national parks in recent four decades: Evidence from land use and land cover changes.
Chen X; Yu L; Cao Y; Xu Y; Zhao Z; Zhuang Y; Liu X; Du Z; Liu T; Yang B; He L; Wu H; Yang R; Gong P
J Environ Manage; 2023 Jan; 325(Pt A):116505. PubMed ID: 36270131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Challenges and Opportunities in Aligning Conservation with Development in China's National Parks: A Narrative Literature Review.
Rule A; Dill SE; Sun G; Chen A; Khawaja S; Li I; Zhang V; Rozelle S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(19):. PubMed ID: 36232085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatial evaluation of the ecological value importance of national park in Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Canyon.
Duan S; Han F; Li F; Yang Z
J Environ Manage; 2022 Oct; 320():115943. PubMed ID: 36056501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Identification of the priority conservation areas of national park: A case study of Lishui City, Zhejiang Province, China].
Hou M; Tang XP; Huang GL; Li RQ
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2020 Jul; 31(7):2332-2340. PubMed ID: 32715699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of spatial and temporal changes in human interference in important ecological function areas in China: the Gansu section of Qilian Mountain National Park as an example.
Ma L; Zhu Z; Li S; Li J
Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Aug; 195(9):1029. PubMed ID: 37558900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Formulating win-win management plans in Protected Areas (PAs) based on Key Ecosystem services (KESs): An application in the Shennongjia National Park, China.
Zhang B; Min Q; Jiao W
J Environ Manage; 2022 Oct; 320():115831. PubMed ID: 35944324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatial and temporal variations and significance identification of ecosystem services in the Sanjiangyuan National Park, China.
Cao W; Wu D; Huang L; Liu L
Sci Rep; 2020 Apr; 10(1):6151. PubMed ID: 32273561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ecological Health Assessment of Chinese National Parks Based on Landscape Pattern: A Case Study in Shennongjia National Park.
Shu H; Xiao C; Ma T; Sang W
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(21):. PubMed ID: 34770001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the Carbon Sink Capacity of the Proposed Kunlun Mountain National Park.
Zhao L; Du M; Du W; Guo J; Liao Z; Kang X; Liu Q
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Aug; 19(16):. PubMed ID: 36011521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment and spatial partitioning of ecosystem services importance in Giant Panda National Park: To provide targeted ecological protection.
Li Z; Zhu J
PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0278877. PubMed ID: 36490286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation and prediction of ecological carrying capacity in the Qilian Mountain National Park, China.
Shan SY; Xu HJ; Qi XL; Chen T; Wang XD
J Environ Manage; 2023 Aug; 339():117856. PubMed ID: 37129968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ecological Compensation Strategy for SDG-Based Basin-Type National Parks: A Case Study of the Baoxing Giant Panda National Park.
Xue C; Shao C; Gao J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(11):. PubMed ID: 32486478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reconciling ecological footprint and ecosystem services in natural capital accounting: Applying a novel framework to the Silk Road Economic Belt in China.
Zhang R; Li P; Xu L; Zhong S
J Environ Manage; 2023 Mar; 330():117115. PubMed ID: 36587549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impacts of nature reserve policy on regional ecological environment quality: A case study of Sanjiangyuan region.
Wang QY; Zhou DY; An PL; Jiang GH
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2023 May; 34(5):1349-1359. PubMed ID: 37236953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Land use trade-offs in China's protected areas from the perspective of accounting values of ecosystem services.
Chen H; Costanza R; Kubiszewski I
J Environ Manage; 2022 Aug; 315():115178. PubMed ID: 35504187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of extreme natural events on the provision of ecosystem services in a mountain environment: The importance of trail design in delivering system resilience and ecosystem service co-benefits.
Tomczyk AM; White PC; Ewertowski MW
J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 166():156-67. PubMed ID: 26496846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation and Change Analysis of Ecosystem Service Value of China's Northeast Tiger-Leopard National Park Based on Big Data Land Use Change.
Zhai Y; Li W
Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():6270731. PubMed ID: 35795771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
