These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36566088)

  • 21. How Robust Is the Ligand Binding Transition State?
    Bose S; Lotz SD; Deb I; Shuck M; Lee KSS; Dickson A
    J Am Chem Soc; 2023 Nov; 145(46):25318-25331. PubMed ID: 37943667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Kinetics of Drug Binding and Residence Time.
    Bernetti M; Masetti M; Rocchia W; Cavalli A
    Annu Rev Phys Chem; 2019 Jun; 70():143-171. PubMed ID: 30786217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of protein-ligand affinity prediction using steered molecular dynamics simulations.
    Okimoto N; Suenaga A; Taiji M
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2017 Nov; 35(15):3221-3231. PubMed ID: 27771988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ligand Release Pathways Obtained with WExplore: Residence Times and Mechanisms.
    Dickson A; Lotz SD
    J Phys Chem B; 2016 Jun; 120(24):5377-85. PubMed ID: 27231969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ligand Gaussian Accelerated Molecular Dynamics (LiGaMD): Characterization of Ligand Binding Thermodynamics and Kinetics.
    Miao Y; Bhattarai A; Wang J
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Sep; 16(9):5526-5547. PubMed ID: 32692556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perspectives on Ligand/Protein Binding Kinetics Simulations: Force Fields, Machine Learning, Sampling, and User-Friendliness.
    Conflitti P; Raniolo S; Limongelli V
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Sep; 19(18):6047-6061. PubMed ID: 37656199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Residence Time Prediction of Type 1 and 2 Kinase Inhibitors from Unbinding Simulations.
    Braka A; Garnier N; Bonnet P; Aci-Sèche S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Jan; 60(1):342-348. PubMed ID: 31834793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multisecond ligand dissociation dynamics from atomistic simulations.
    Wolf S; Lickert B; Bray S; Stock G
    Nat Commun; 2020 Jun; 11(1):2918. PubMed ID: 32522984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Machine Learning Analysis of τRAMD Trajectories to Decipher Molecular Determinants of Drug-Target Residence Times.
    Kokh DB; Kaufmann T; Kister B; Wade RC
    Front Mol Biosci; 2019; 6():36. PubMed ID: 31179286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Recent advances in protein-ligand interactions: molecular dynamics simulations and binding free energy.
    Dubey KD; Tiwari RK; Ojha RP
    Curr Comput Aided Drug Des; 2013 Dec; 9(4):518-31. PubMed ID: 24138393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Contact Map Fingerprints of Protein-Ligand Unbinding Trajectories Reveal Mechanisms Determining Residence Times Computed from Scaled Molecular Dynamics.
    Bianciotto M; Gkeka P; Kokh DB; Wade RC; Minoux H
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Oct; 17(10):6522-6535. PubMed ID: 34494849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Estimation of kinetic and thermodynamic ligand-binding parameters using computational strategies.
    Deganutti G; Moro S
    Future Med Chem; 2017 Apr; 9(5):507-523. PubMed ID: 28362130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How Effectively Can Adaptive Sampling Methods Capture Spontaneous Ligand Binding?
    Betz RM; Dror RO
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Mar; 15(3):2053-2063. PubMed ID: 30645108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Receptor rigidity and ligand mobility in trypsin-ligand complexes.
    Guvench O; Price DJ; Brooks CL
    Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(2):407-17. PubMed ID: 15578663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Predicting Residence Time and Drug Unbinding Pathway through Scaled Molecular Dynamics.
    Schuetz DA; Bernetti M; Bertazzo M; Musil D; Eggenweiler HM; Recanatini M; Masetti M; Ecker GF; Cavalli A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jan; 59(1):535-549. PubMed ID: 30500211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Kinetic Measurements to Estimate and Predict Protein-Ligand Residence Times.
    Mollica L; Theret I; Antoine M; Perron-Sierra F; Charton Y; Fourquez JM; Wierzbicki M; Boutin JA; Ferry G; Decherchi S; Bottegoni G; Ducrot P; Cavalli A
    J Med Chem; 2016 Aug; 59(15):7167-76. PubMed ID: 27391254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. 15 Years of molecular simulation of drug-binding kinetics.
    Wong CF
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2023; 18(12):1333-1348. PubMed ID: 37789731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Transient States and Barriers from Molecular Simulations and the Milestoning Theory: Kinetics in Ligand-Protein Recognition and Compound Design.
    Tang Z; Chen SH; Chang CA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Mar; 16(3):1882-1895. PubMed ID: 32031801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Predicting Protein-Ligand Binding and Unbinding Kinetics with Biased MD Simulations and Coarse-Graining of Dynamics: Current State and Challenges.
    Wolf S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 May; 63(10):2902-2910. PubMed ID: 37133392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Can One Trust Kinetic and Thermodynamic Observables from Biased Metadynamics Simulations?: Detailed Quantitative Benchmarks on Millimolar Drug Fragment Dissociation.
    Pramanik D; Smith Z; Kells A; Tiwary P
    J Phys Chem B; 2019 May; 123(17):3672-3678. PubMed ID: 30974941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.