154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36566097)
1. Defining numerical cut points for mild, moderate, and severe pain in adult burn survivors: A northwest regional burn model system investigation.
Carrougher GJ; Bamer AM; Mason S; Stewart BT; Gibran NS
Burns; 2023 Mar; 49(2):310-316. PubMed ID: 36566097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pain across traumatic injury groups: A National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research model systems study.
Amtmann D; Bamer AM; McMullen K; Gibran NS; Hoffman JM; Bombardier CH; Carrougher GJ
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2020 Oct; 89(4):829-833. PubMed ID: 32590556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison of pain intensity measurements among patients with low-back pain].
Nagy Z; Kiss N; Szigeti M; Áfra J; Lekka N; Misik F; Mucsi I; Banczerowski P
Ideggyogy Sz; 2024 Mar; 77(3-4):131-135. PubMed ID: 38591924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cut-Off Points for Mild, Moderate, and Severe Pain on the Numeric Rating Scale for Pain in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Variability and Influence of Sex and Catastrophizing.
Boonstra AM; Stewart RE; Köke AJ; Oosterwijk RF; Swaan JL; Schreurs KM; Schiphorst Preuper HR
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1466. PubMed ID: 27746750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cut-off points between pain intensities of the postoperative pain using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
Cho S; Kim YJ; Lee M; Woo JH; Lee HJ
BMC Anesthesiol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):29. PubMed ID: 33494704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determination of moderate-to-severe postoperative pain on the numeric rating scale: a cut-off point analysis applying four different methods.
Gerbershagen HJ; Rothaug J; Kalkman CJ; Meissner W
Br J Anaesth; 2011 Oct; 107(4):619-26. PubMed ID: 21724620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of PROMIS-29 domain scores among adult burn survivors: A National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Burn Model System Study.
McMullen K; Bamer A; Ryan CM; Schneider JC; Gibran N; Stewart BT; Mroz T; Wolf S; Amtmann D
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2022 Jan; 92(1):213-222. PubMed ID: 34284470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What should be the optimal cut points for mild, moderate, and severe pain?
Li KK; Harris K; Hadi S; Chow E
J Palliat Med; 2007 Dec; 10(6):1338-46. PubMed ID: 18095813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cut points for mild, moderate, and severe pain among cancer and non-cancer patients: a literature review.
Woo A; Lechner B; Fu T; Wong CS; Chiu N; Lam H; Pulenzas N; Soliman H; DeAngelis C; Chow E
Ann Palliat Med; 2015 Oct; 4(4):176-83. PubMed ID: 26541396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of pain Scrambler therapy for management of burn scar pruritus: A pilot study.
Joo SY; Cho YS; Cho SR; Kym D; Seo CH
Burns; 2017 May; 43(3):514-519. PubMed ID: 27756587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Correlation Between PROMIS Pain Interference and VAS Pain in Ambulatory Orthopedic Patients.
Jildeh TR; Lizzio VA; Meta F; Fidai MS; Kaat AJ; Makhni EC
Orthopedics; 2018 Nov; 41(6):e813-e819. PubMed ID: 30222790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe pain on the visual analogue scale for pain in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
Boonstra AM; Schiphorst Preuper HR; Balk GA; Stewart RE
Pain; 2014 Dec; 155(12):2545-2550. PubMed ID: 25239073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variability of "optimal" cut points for mild, moderate, and severe pain: neglected problems when comparing groups.
Hirschfeld G; Zernikow B
Pain; 2013 Jan; 154(1):154-159. PubMed ID: 23182623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cut points for mild, moderate, and severe pain on the VAS for children and adolescents: what can be learned from 10 million ANOVAs?
Hirschfeld G; Zernikow B
Pain; 2013 Dec; 154(12):2626-2632. PubMed ID: 23742796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the usefulness of two established pain assessment tools in a burn population.
Wibbenmeyer L; Sevier A; Liao J; Williams I; Latenser B; Lewis R; Kealey P; Rosenquist R
J Burn Care Res; 2011; 32(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 21116190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The evaluation of smartphone versions of the visual analogue scale and numeric rating scale as postoperative pain assessment tools: a prospective randomized trial.
Chiu LYL; Sun T; Ree R; Dunsmuir D; Dotto A; Ansermino JM; Yarnold C
Can J Anaesth; 2019 Jun; 66(6):706-715. PubMed ID: 30796700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. VAS and NRS, Same or Different? Are Visual Analog Scale Values and Numerical Rating Scale Equally Viable Tools for Assessing Patients after Microdiscectomy?
Bielewicz J; Daniluk B; Kamieniak P
Pain Res Manag; 2022; 2022():5337483. PubMed ID: 35391853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pain and itch outcome trajectories differ among European American and African American survivors of major thermal burn injury.
Mauck MC; Smith J; Shupp JW; Weaver MA; Liu A; Bortsov AV; Lateef B; Jones SW; Williams F; Hwang J; Karlnoski R; Smith DJ; Cairns BA; McLean SA
Pain; 2017 Nov; 158(11):2268-2276. PubMed ID: 28796116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department.
Bijur PE; Latimer CT; Gallagher EJ
Acad Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 10(4):390-2. PubMed ID: 12670856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of electroacupuncture on analgesia and peripheral sensory thresholds in patients with burn scar pain.
Cuignet O; Pirlot A; Ortiz S; Rose T
Burns; 2015 Sep; 41(6):1298-305. PubMed ID: 26188894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
