These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36566305)

  • 1. Are some controversial views in bioethics Juvenalian satire without irony?
    Häyry M
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2023 Apr; 44(2):177-189. PubMed ID: 36566305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pro-Life Arguments Against Infanticide and Why they are Not Convincing.
    Räsänen J
    Bioethics; 2016 Nov; 30(9):656-662. PubMed ID: 27717058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A dubious defense of 'after-birth abortion': A reply to Räsänen.
    Kaczor C
    Bioethics; 2018 Feb; 32(2):132-137. PubMed ID: 29171674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva.
    Manninen BA
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):330-5. PubMed ID: 23637447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva.
    Beard M; Lynch S
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e1-4. PubMed ID: 23637453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. First, do no harm: Generalized procreative non-maleficence.
    Saunders B
    Bioethics; 2017 Sep; 31(7):552-558. PubMed ID: 28786178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Potentials and burdens: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva.
    Beckwith FJ
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):341-4. PubMed ID: 23637449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The principle of procreative beneficence: old arguments and a new challenge.
    Hotke A
    Bioethics; 2014 Jun; 28(5):255-62. PubMed ID: 22845855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The moral status of babies.
    McGee A
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):345-8. PubMed ID: 23637450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Of course the baby should live: against 'after-birth abortion'.
    Rini RA
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):353-6. PubMed ID: 23637452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What exactly did you claim?
    Häyry M
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2015 Jan; 24(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 25473863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Case Against the Case for Procreative Beneficence (PB).
    Holland A
    Bioethics; 2016 Sep; 30(7):490-9. PubMed ID: 27000681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When intuition is not enough. Why the Principle of Procreative Beneficence must work much harder to justify its eugenic vision.
    Bennett R
    Bioethics; 2014 Nov; 28(9):447-55. PubMed ID: 23841936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Failures of Imagination: Disability and the Ethics of Selective Reproduction.
    Soniewicka M
    Bioethics; 2015 Oct; 29(8):557-63. PubMed ID: 25689344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Viable Violinist.
    Hawking M
    Bioethics; 2016 Jun; 30(5):312-6. PubMed ID: 26423668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Infanticide, moral status and moral reasons: the importance of context.
    Francis L; Silvers A
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):289-92. PubMed ID: 23637429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Procreative responsibilities and the parental obligation objection.
    Shaw J
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2022 Jun; 43(2-3):111-125. PubMed ID: 35859089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why arguments against infanticide remain convincing: A reply to Räsänen.
    Rodger D; Blackshaw BP; Wilcox C
    Bioethics; 2018 Mar; 32(3):215-219. PubMed ID: 29369381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The principle of procreative beneficence and its implications for genetic engineering.
    Gantsho L
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2022 Dec; 43(5-6):307-328. PubMed ID: 35882747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wrongs, preferences, and the selection of children: a critique of Rebecca Bennett's argument against the principle of procreative beneficence.
    Herissone-Kelly P
    Bioethics; 2012 Oct; 26(8):447-54. PubMed ID: 21320140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.