These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36566830)

  • 1. A modified scan technique for multiple abutment teeth using the trim and lock function.
    Valenti M; Valenti A; Cortellini D; Schmitz JH; Canale A
    J Dent; 2023 Feb; 129():104406. PubMed ID: 36566830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [
    Xu XX; Cao Y; Zhao YJ; Jia L; Xie QF
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Dec; 53(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 33550336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interim restoration technique for gingival displacement with a feather-edge preparation design and digital scan.
    Schmitz JH; Valenti M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Apr; 123(4):580-583. PubMed ID: 31375275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of distance between the abutment and the adjacent teeth on intraoral scanning: An in vitro study.
    Huang MY; Son K; Lee KB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):911-917. PubMed ID: 32473732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Influence of trueness for local finish lines of a full crown preparation on that of complete finish line].
    Jiang N; Bao XD; Yue L
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Sep; 53(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 33550343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Limited evidence suggests complete arch digital scans are less time efficient than conventional impression.
    Sedky A; Abd-Elwahab Radi I
    Evid Based Dent; 2020 Dec; 21(4):138-139. PubMed ID: 33339976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of three digital scanning methods for complete-arch tooth preparation: An in vitro comparison.
    Gao H; Liu X; Liu M; Yang X; Tan J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 33736864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical Factors Influence the Trueness of Intra-oral Scanning.
    Jivanescu A; Rotar P; Hategan S; Pricop C; Rus R; Goguta L
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 May; 27(1):51-55. PubMed ID: 31046207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of 4 digital scanning systems on prepared teeth digitally isolated from a complete dental arch.
    Medina-Sotomayor P; Pascual-Moscardo A; Camps A I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):811-820. PubMed ID: 30598308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital assessment of the accuracy of implant impression techniques in free end saddle partially edentulous patients. A controlled clinical trial.
    Dohiem MM; Abdelaziz MS; Abdalla MF; Fawzy AM
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Nov; 22(1):486. PubMed ID: 36371189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model].
    Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine.
    Revilla-León M; Att W; Özcan M; Rubenstein J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 32386912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions.
    Carbajal Mejía JB; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T; Yatani H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):392-399. PubMed ID: 28222873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of finish line locations of tooth preparation on the accuracy of intraoral scanners.
    Son K; Lee KB
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Feb; 24(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 34006061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trueness of full-arch IO scans estimated based on 3D translational and rotational deviations of single teeth-an in vitro study.
    Radeke J; Vogel AB; Schmidt F; Kilic F; Repky S; Beyersmann J; Lapatki BG
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Mar; 26(3):3273-3286. PubMed ID: 34837565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of Tooth Preparation Design and Scan Angulations on the Accuracy of Two Intraoral Digital Scanners: An in Vitro Study Based on 3-Dimensional Comparisons.
    Ammoun R; Suprono MS; Goodacre CJ; Oyoyo U; Carrico CK; Kattadiyil MT
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Mar; 29(3):201-206. PubMed ID: 31994818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gingival retraction techniques for implants versus teeth: current status.
    Bennani V; Schwass D; Chandler N
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Oct; 139(10):1354-63. PubMed ID: 18832271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effect of digital intraoral full-arch scan strategies on scan time and accuracy on conditions of intraoral head-simulator].
    Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Chen DP; Su YC; Wang X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Nov; 56(11):1092-1097. PubMed ID: 34763404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of adjacent teeth on the accuracy of intraoral scanning systems for class II inlay preparation.
    Kim JH; Son SA; Lee H; Yoo YJ; Hong SJ; Park JK
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jul; 34(5):826-832. PubMed ID: 34608739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A fully digital approach to replicate peri-implant soft tissue contours and emergence profile in the esthetic zone.
    Monaco C; Evangelisti E; Scotti R; Mignani G; Zucchelli G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1511-1514. PubMed ID: 25907030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.