144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36567954)
21. Desktop VR Is Better Than Non-ambulatory HMD VR for Spatial Learning.
Srivastava P; Rimzhim A; Vijay P; Singh S; Chandra S
Front Robot AI; 2019; 6():50. PubMed ID: 33501066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Feasibility of a walking virtual reality system for rehabilitation: objective and subjective parameters.
Borrego A; Latorre J; Llorens R; Alcañiz M; Noé E
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Aug; 13(1):68. PubMed ID: 27503112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Immersive virtual reality during gait rehabilitation increases walking speed and motivation: a usability evaluation with healthy participants and patients with multiple sclerosis and stroke.
Winter C; Kern F; Gall D; Latoschik ME; Pauli P; Käthner I
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Apr; 18(1):68. PubMed ID: 33888148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of Visually Induced Motion Sickness from Head-Mounted Display on Cardiac Activity.
Park S; Ha J; Kim L
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 22(16):. PubMed ID: 36015973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Factors Associated With Virtual Reality Sickness in Head-Mounted Displays: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Saredakis D; Szpak A; Birckhead B; Keage HAD; Rizzo A; Loetscher T
Front Hum Neurosci; 2020; 14():96. PubMed ID: 32300295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparative study of cybersickness during exposure to virtual reality and "classic" motion sickness: are they different?
Mazloumi Gavgani A; Walker FR; Hodgson DM; Nalivaiko E
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2018 Dec; 125(6):1670-1680. PubMed ID: 30284516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. What factors influence continuous usage intention of head-mounted display-based virtual reality content?: a cross-sectional survey.
Choi J; Moon H; Park M
Korean J Women Health Nurs; 2023 Sep; 29(3):208-218. PubMed ID: 37813664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The role of binocular disparity and active motion parallax in cybersickness.
Eftekharifar S; Thaler A; Bebko AO; Troje NF
Exp Brain Res; 2021 Aug; 239(8):2649-2660. PubMed ID: 34216232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluating attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in children and adolescents through tracked head movements in a virtual reality classroom: The effect of social cues with different sensory modalities.
Cho YJ; Yum JY; Kim K; Shin B; Eom H; Hong YJ; Heo J; Kim JJ; Lee HS; Kim E
Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():943478. PubMed ID: 35992945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Usability Comparisons of Head-Mounted vs. Stereoscopic Desktop Displays in a Virtual Reality Environment with Pain Patients.
Tong X; Gromala D; Gupta D; Squire P
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 220():424-31. PubMed ID: 27046617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Active View and Passive View in Virtual Reality Have Different Impacts on Memory and Impression.
Hine K; Tasaki H
Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2416. PubMed ID: 31736823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Subjective Visual Vertical test with the 3D virtual reality system: effective factors and cybersickness.
Ardıç FN; Metin U; Gökcan BE
Acta Otolaryngol; 2023; 143(7):570-575. PubMed ID: 37493360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Influence of Sensory Conflict on Perceived Timing of Passive Rotation in Virtual Reality.
Chung W; Barnett-Cowan M
Multisens Res; 2022 Apr; ():1-23. PubMed ID: 35477696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Studying the Effect of Display Type and Viewing Perspective on User Experience in Virtual Reality Exergames.
Xu W; Liang HN; Zhang Z; Baghaei N
Games Health J; 2020 Dec; 9(6):405-414. PubMed ID: 32074463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of Immersive Virtual Reality Headset Viewing on Young Children: Visuomotor Function, Postural Stability, and Motion Sickness.
Tychsen L; Foeller P
Am J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 209():151-159. PubMed ID: 31377280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cybersickness Variability by Race: Findings From 6 Studies and a Mini Meta-analysis.
Martingano AJ; Brown E; Telaak SH; Dolwick AP; Persky S
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jun; 24(6):e36843. PubMed ID: 35648477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparing the effectiveness of different displays in enhancing illusions of self-movement (vection).
Riecke BE; Jordan JD
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():713. PubMed ID: 26082735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Amplified Head Rotation in Virtual Reality and the Effects on 3D Search, Training Transfer, and Spatial Orientation.
Ragan ED; Scerbo S; Bacim F; Bowman DA
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2017 Aug; 23(8):1880-1895. PubMed ID: 28113630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Estimating objective (EEG) and subjective (SSQ) cybersickness in people with susceptibility to motion sickness.
Jang KM; Kwon M; Nam SG; Kim D; Lim HK
Appl Ergon; 2022 Jul; 102():103731. PubMed ID: 35248910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Estimating the sensorimotor components of cybersickness.
Weech S; Varghese JP; Barnett-Cowan M
J Neurophysiol; 2018 Nov; 120(5):2201-2217. PubMed ID: 30044672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
