122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36568937)
1. Patient characteristics of contraception and sterilization selection at vaginal delivery.
Youssefzadeh AC; McGough AM; Sweeney HE; Mandelbaum RS; Ouzounian JG; Matsuo K
F S Rep; 2022 Dec; 3(4):361-365. PubMed ID: 36568937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inpatient Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Sterilization in the United States, 2008-2013.
Moniz MH; Chang T; Heisler M; Admon L; Gebremariam A; Dalton VK; Davis MM
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 129(6):1078-1085. PubMed ID: 28486357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contraception and sterilization selection at delivery among pregnant patients with malignancy.
Harris CA; Mandelbaum RS; Rau AR; Song BB; Klar M; Ouzounian JG; Paulson RJ; Roman LD; Matsuo K
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 Apr; 103(4):695-706. PubMed ID: 37578024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes in Rates of Inpatient Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Sterilization in the USA, 2012-2016.
Sheyn D; Arora KS
Matern Child Health J; 2021 Oct; 25(10):1562-1573. PubMed ID: 33970416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Update on incidence of inpatient tubal ligation and long-acting reversible contraception in the United States.
Fang NZ; Westhoff CL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Sep; 227(3):477.e1-477.e7. PubMed ID: 35569515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Postpartum contraception: initiation and effectiveness in a large universal healthcare system.
Brunson MR; Klein DA; Olsen CH; Weir LF; Roberts TA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):55.e1-55.e9. PubMed ID: 28257962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevalence and predictors of initiation of intrauterine devices and subdermal implants immediately after surgical abortion.
Roe AH; Fortin J; Janiak E; Maurer R; Goldberg AB
Contraception; 2019 Aug; 100(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 31082394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The cost-effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods in the UK: analysis based on a decision-analytic model developed for a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) clinical practice guideline.
Mavranezouli I;
Hum Reprod; 2008 Jun; 23(6):1338-45. PubMed ID: 18372257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Associations between immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception and short interpregnancy intervals.
Wu M; Eisenberg R; Negassa A; Levi E
Contraception; 2020 Dec; 102(6):409-413. PubMed ID: 32918870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adherence to Recommended Practices for Provision of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Providers in a Large U.S. Health Care System.
Judge-Golden CP; Wiesenfeld HC; Chen BA; Borrero S
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2020 Dec; 29(12):1586-1595. PubMed ID: 32667847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Paradigm shift from tubal ligation to opportunistic salpingectomy at cesarean delivery in the United States.
Mandelbaum RS; Matsuzaki S; Sangara RN; Klar M; Matsushima K; Roman LD; Paulson RJ; Wright JD; Matsuo K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):399.e1-399.e32. PubMed ID: 34181896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patients' Experiences with an Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Program.
Wallace Huff C; Potter JE; Hopkins K
Womens Health Issues; 2021; 31(2):164-170. PubMed ID: 33323329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Condom Use With Long-Acting Reversible Contraception vs Non-Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Hormonal Methods Among Postpartum Adolescents.
Kortsmit K; Williams L; Pazol K; Smith RA; Whiteman M; Barfield W; Koumans E; Kourtis A; Harrison L; Bauman B; Warner L
JAMA Pediatr; 2019 Jul; 173(7):663-670. PubMed ID: 31107513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of offering immediate postpartum placement of IUDs and implants to pregnant patients with heart disease.
Sinkey RG; Blanchard CT; Maier J; Novara A; Mazzoni SE; Goepfert AR; Boozer M; Rajapreyar I; Cribbs M; Szychowski JM; Tita ATN
Contraception; 2022 Jan; 105():55-60. PubMed ID: 34529951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Postpartum Permanent Sterilization: Could Bilateral Salpingectomy Replace Bilateral Tubal Ligation?
Danis RB; Della Badia CR; Richard SD
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):928-32. PubMed ID: 27234430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimated disability-adjusted life years averted by long-term provision of long acting contraceptive methods in a Brazilian clinic.
Bahamondes L; Bottura BF; Bahamondes MV; Gonçalves MP; Correia VM; Espejo-Arce X; Sousa MH; Monteiro I; Fernandes A
Hum Reprod; 2014 Oct; 29(10):2163-70. PubMed ID: 25085802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Knowledge and Acceptability of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Adolescent Women Receiving School-Based Primary Care Services.
Hoopes AJ; Ahrens KR; Gilmore K; Cady J; Haaland WL; Amies Oelschlager AM; Prager S
J Prim Care Community Health; 2016 Jul; 7(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 27067583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery.
Venkatesh KK; Clark LH; Stamilio DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):106.e1-106.e10. PubMed ID: 30170036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Initiation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception in Hospitalized Adolescents in the United States.
Allison BA; Ritter V; Flower KB; Perry MF
Hosp Pediatr; 2021 Jul; 11(7):764-770. PubMed ID: 34112700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immediate Postpartum Contraception: A Survey Needs Assessment of a National Sample of Midwives.
Moniz MH; Roosevelt L; Crissman HP; Kobernik EK; Dalton VK; Heisler MH; Low LK
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2017 Sep; 62(5):538-544. PubMed ID: 28881464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
