BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36569230)

  • 1. Published correlational effect sizes in social and developmental psychology.
    Weinerová J; Szűcs D; Ioannidis JPA
    R Soc Open Sci; 2022 Dec; 9(12):220311. PubMed ID: 36569230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Novel Effect Size Interpretation Guidelines and an Evaluation of Statistical Power in Rehabilitation Research.
    Kinney AR; Eakman AM; Graham JE
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Dec; 101(12):2219-2226. PubMed ID: 32272106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect size guidelines for cross-lagged effects.
    Orth U; Meier LL; Bühler JL; Dapp LC; Krauss S; Messerli D; Robins RW
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):421-433. PubMed ID: 35737548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect Size Guidelines, Sample Size Calculations, and Statistical Power in Gerontology.
    Brydges CR
    Innov Aging; 2019 Aug; 3(4):igz036. PubMed ID: 31528719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015.
    Chavalarias D; Wallach JD; Li AH; Ioannidis JP
    JAMA; 2016 Mar; 315(11):1141-8. PubMed ID: 26978209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reporting sample size calculations for randomized controlled trials published in nursing journals: A cross-sectional study.
    Tam W; Lo K; Woo B
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2020 Feb; 102():103450. PubMed ID: 31731176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Examination of Effect Sizes and Statistical Power in Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.
    Gaeta L; Brydges CR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 May; 63(5):1572-1580. PubMed ID: 32343919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical considerations for reporting and planning heart rate variability case-control studies.
    Quintana DS
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Mar; 54(3):344-349. PubMed ID: 27914167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Caution regarding the choice of standard deviations to guide sample size calculations in clinical trials.
    Chen H; Zhang N; Lu X; Chen S
    Clin Trials; 2013 Aug; 10(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 23794405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Publication bias in psychology: a diagnosis based on the correlation between effect size and sample size.
    Kühberger A; Fritz A; Scherndl T
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e105825. PubMed ID: 25192357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Power, effects, confidence, and significance: an investigation of statistical practices in nursing research.
    Gaskin CJ; Happell B
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2014 May; 51(5):795-806. PubMed ID: 24207028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical Inferences Using Effect Sizes in Human Endothelial Function Research.
    Cherubini JM; MacDonald MJ
    Artery Res; 2021; 27(4):176-185. PubMed ID: 34966462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meeting the challenge of the Psychonomic Society's 2012 Guidelines on Statistical Issues: Some success and some room for improvement.
    Morris PE; Fritz CO
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):2037-2043. PubMed ID: 28315170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.
    Turner L; Shamseer L; Altman DG; Weeks L; Peters J; Kober T; Dias S; Schulz KF; Plint AC; Moher D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11(11):MR000030. PubMed ID: 23152285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The N-pact factor: evaluating the quality of empirical journals with respect to sample size and statistical power.
    Fraley RC; Vazire S
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e109019. PubMed ID: 25296159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlational effect size benchmarks.
    Bosco FA; Aguinis H; Singh K; Field JG; Pierce CA
    J Appl Psychol; 2015 Mar; 100(2):431-49. PubMed ID: 25314367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A systematic review of the reporting of sample size calculations and corresponding data components in observational functional magnetic resonance imaging studies.
    Guo Q; Thabane L; Hall G; McKinnon M; Goeree R; Pullenayegum E
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():172-81. PubMed ID: 23954487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size evolution in neuroimaging research: An evaluation of highly-cited studies (1990-2012) and of latest practices (2017-2018) in high-impact journals.
    Szucs D; Ioannidis JP
    Neuroimage; 2020 Nov; 221():117164. PubMed ID: 32679253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effect sizes, statistical power and sample sizes in "the Japanese Journal of Psychology"].
    Suzukawa Y; Toyoda H
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2012 Apr; 83(1):51-63. PubMed ID: 22715539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.