These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Methodological reporting behavior, sample sizes, and statistical power in studies of event-related potentials: Barriers to reproducibility and replicability. Clayson PE; Carbine KA; Baldwin SA; Larson MJ Psychophysiology; 2019 Nov; 56(11):e13437. PubMed ID: 31322285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature. Szucs D; Ioannidis JP PLoS Biol; 2017 Mar; 15(3):e2000797. PubMed ID: 28253258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Outlier removal and the relation with reporting errors and quality of psychological research. Bakker M; Wicherts JM PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e103360. PubMed ID: 25072606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pitfalls in reporting sample size calculation in randomized controlled trials published in leading anaesthesia journals: a systematic review. Abdulatif M; Mukhtar A; Obayah G Br J Anaesth; 2015 Nov; 115(5):699-707. PubMed ID: 26041717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Publication bias in ecology and evolution: an empirical assessment using the 'trim and fill' method. Jennions MD; Møller AP Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2002 May; 77(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 12056747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect sizes in memory research. Morris PE; Fritz CO Memory; 2013; 21(7):832-42. PubMed ID: 23350788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Alpha values as a function of sample size, effect size, and power: accuracy over inference. Bradley MT; Brand A Psychol Rep; 2013 Jun; 112(3):835-44. PubMed ID: 24245076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sample size calculations in human electrophysiology (EEG and ERP) studies: A systematic review and recommendations for increased rigor. Larson MJ; Carbine KA Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Jan; 111():33-41. PubMed ID: 27373837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect size, statistical power, and sample size for assessing interactions between categorical and continuous variables. Shieh G Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Feb; 72(1):136-154. PubMed ID: 30468259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Determining sample size adequacy for animal model studies in nutrition research: limits and ethical challenges of ordinary power calculation procedures. Ricci C; Baumgartner J; Malan L; Smuts CM Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2020 Mar; 71(2):256-264. PubMed ID: 31379222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions. Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Kirkham J; Dwan K; Kramer S; Green S; Forbes A Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):MR000035. PubMed ID: 25271098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Sample size determination for mediation analysis of longitudinal data. Pan H; Liu S; Miao D; Yuan Y BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Mar; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 29580203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The consistency between scientific papers presented at the Orthopaedic Trauma Association and their subsequent full-text publication. Preston CF; Bhandari M; Fulkerson E; Ginat D; Egol KA; Koval KJ J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Feb; 20(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 16462566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Failure to Report Effect Sizes: The Handling of Quantitative Results in Published Health Education and Behavior Research. Barry AE; Szucs LE; Reyes JV; Ji Q; Wilson KL; Thompson B Health Educ Behav; 2016 Oct; 43(5):518-27. PubMed ID: 27624442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Revisiting the Sample Size and Statistical Power of Randomized Controlled Trials in Orthopaedics After 2 Decades. Reito A; Raittio L; Helminen O JBJS Rev; 2020 Feb; 8(2):e0079. PubMed ID: 32224628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. Fritz CO; Morris PE; Richler JJ J Exp Psychol Gen; 2012 Feb; 141(1):2-18. PubMed ID: 21823805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles. Schimmack U Psychol Methods; 2012 Dec; 17(4):551-66. PubMed ID: 22924598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]