143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36569682)
1. Can CT Pelvimetry Be Used to Predict Circumferential Resection Margin Positivity in Laparoscopic Resection of Middle and Lower Rectum Cancer?
Gojayev A; Yuksel C; Akbulut S; Erşen O; Bakırarar B; Gülpınar B; Gürsoy Çoruh A; Unal AE; Demirci S
Cureus; 2022 Nov; 14(11):e31745. PubMed ID: 36569682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variations in pelvic dimensions do not predict the risk of circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement in rectal cancer.
Salerno G; Daniels IR; Brown G; Norman AR; Moran BJ; Heald RJ
World J Surg; 2007 Jun; 31(6):1313-20. PubMed ID: 17468974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MRI assessment of the bony pelvis may help predict resectability of rectal cancer.
Boyle KM; Petty D; Chalmers AG; Quirke P; Cairns A; Finan PJ; Sagar PM; Burke D
Colorectal Dis; 2005 May; 7(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 15859960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: "narrow pelvis" is not a contraindication.
Ogiso S; Yamaguchi T; Hata H; Fukuda M; Ikai I; Yamato T; Sakai Y
Surg Endosc; 2011 Jun; 25(6):1907-12. PubMed ID: 21136101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of the laparoscopy on circumferential resection margin positivity in patients with rectal cancer: long-term outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
Dural AC; Keskin M; Balik E; Akici M; Kunduz E; Yamaner S; Asoglu O; Gulluoglu M; Bugra D
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2015 Apr; 25(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 25159046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT pelvimetry and clinicopathological parameters in evaluation of the technical difficulties in performing open rectal surgery for mid-low rectal cancer.
Zhou XC; Su M; Hu KQ; Su YF; Ye YH; Huang CQ; Yu ZL; Li XY; Zhou H; Ni YZ; Jiang YI; Lou Z
Oncol Lett; 2016 Jan; 11(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 26870163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sparing Sphincters and Laparoscopic Resection Improve Survival by Optimizing the Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Patients.
Keskin M; Bayraktar A; Sivirikoz E; Yegen G; Karip B; Saglam E; Bulut MT; Balik E
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Feb; 95(5):e2669. PubMed ID: 26844498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting the pathological features of the mesorectum before the laparoscopic approach to rectal cancer.
Fernández Ananín S; Targarona EM; Martinez C; Pernas JC; Hernández D; Gich I; Sancho FJ; Trias M
Surg Endosc; 2014 Dec; 28(12):3458-66. PubMed ID: 24950725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pelvic inlet shape measured by three-dimensional pelvimetry is a predictor of the operative time in the anterior resection of rectal cancer.
Shimada T; Tsuruta M; Hasegawa H; Okabayashi K; Ishida T; Asada Y; Suzumura H; Kitagawa Y
Surg Today; 2018 Jan; 48(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 28597348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Circumferential resection margin involvement after laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.
Raftopoulos I; Reed JF; Bergamaschi R
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Apr; 14(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 21689315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nomogram for predicting the feasibility of natural orifice specimen extraction after laparoscopic rectal resection.
Huang B; Liu MC; Gao W; Tang J; Zhu Z; Chen L; Han JY; Zhou ZQ; Fu CG
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Jul; 36(7):1803-1811. PubMed ID: 33150976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of MRI pelvimetry in predicting technical difficulty and outcomes of open and minimally invasive total mesorectal excision: a systematic review.
Hong JS; Brown KGM; Waller J; Young CJ; Solomon MJ
Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Oct; 24(10):991-1000. PubMed ID: 32623536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer.
Akiyoshi T; Kuroyanagi H; Oya M; Konishi T; Fukuda M; Fujimoto Y; Ueno M; Miyata S; Yamaguchi T
Surgery; 2009 Sep; 146(3):483-9. PubMed ID: 19715805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of circumferential resection margins on survival following rectal cancer surgery.
Mois E; Graur F; Hajjar NA; Puia C; Cote A; Zaharie F; Bartos A; Momani NA; Pop F; Neagos H; Ciorogar G; Iancu C
Ann Ital Chir; 2017; 88():. PubMed ID: 27941239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can MRI pelvimetry predict the technical difficulty of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery?
Hong JSY; De Robles MS; Brown C; Brown KGM; Young CJ; Solomon MJ
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Dec; 36(12):2613-2620. PubMed ID: 34338870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can induction chemotherapy before concurrent chemoradiation impact circumferential resection margin positivity and survival in low rectal cancers?
Bhatti AB; Waheed A; Hafeez A; Akbar A; Syed AA; Khattak S; Kazmi AS
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(7):2993-8. PubMed ID: 25854395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Circumferential resection margin involvement in stage III rectal cancer patients treated with curative resection followed by chemoradiotherapy: a surrogate marker for local recurrence?
Kang J; Kim H; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Sohn SK; Kim NK
Yonsei Med J; 2013 Jan; 54(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 23225809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. BMI and pelvimetry help to predict the duration of laparoscopic resection for low and middle rectal cancer.
Teng W; Liu J; Chen M; Zang W; Wu A
BMC Surg; 2022 Nov; 22(1):402. PubMed ID: 36404329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopy-assisted triple-port anterior resection].
Wu H; Zhang T; Chen X; Jing X; Cheng X; Song Z; Zhu L; He Y; Ji X; Zhang H; Zhao R
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 21(7):779-785. PubMed ID: 30051446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
