These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36571328)

  • 1. Combining clinical parameters and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to stratify biopsy-naïve men for an optimum diagnostic strategy with prostate-specific antigen 4 ng ml
    Zhang CC; Tu X; Lin TH; Cai DM; Yang L; Qiu S; Liu ZH; Yang L; Wei Q
    Asian J Androl; 2023; 25(4):492-498. PubMed ID: 36571328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?
    Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhang F; Huang Y; Tian Y
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):175-186. PubMed ID: 31473884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of prostate-specific antigen density and negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in excluding prostate cancer for biopsy-naïve men: clinical outcomes from a high-volume center in China.
    Zhang CC; Tu X; Lin TH; Cai DM; Yang L; Nie L; Qiu S; Liu ZH; Jin K; Li JK; Xiong XY; Yang L; Wei Q
    Asian J Androl; 2022; 24(6):615-619. PubMed ID: 35532555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.
    Han C; Liu S; Qin XB; Ma S; Zhu LN; Wang XY
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Apr; 101(4):235-244. PubMed ID: 32063483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of different thresholds of PSA density for risk stratification of PI-RADSv2.1 categories on prostate MRI.
    Girometti R; Giannarini G; Panebianco V; Maresca S; Cereser L; De Martino M; Pizzolitto S; Pecoraro M; Ficarra V; Zuiani C; Valotto C
    Br J Radiol; 2022 Mar; 95(1131):20210886. PubMed ID: 34762506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal PSA density threshold and predictive factors for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in patient with a PI-RADS 3 lesion on MRI.
    Nguyen TA; Fourcade A; Zambon A; Saout K; Deruelle C; Joulin V; Tissot V; Doucet L; Rozet F; Fournier G; Valeri A
    Urol Oncol; 2023 Aug; 41(8):354.e11-354.e18. PubMed ID: 37391283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk-Adapted Strategy Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-Specific Antigen Density to Individualize Biopsy Decision in Patients With PI-RADS 3 ``Gray Zone'' Lesions.
    Akpinar C; Oz DK; Oktar A; Suer E; Ozden E; Haliloglu N; Gulpinar O; Gokce MI; Gogus C; Baltaci S
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2024 Jun; 22(3):102071. PubMed ID: 38555682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Avoiding Unnecessary Biopsy after Multiparametric Prostate MRI with VERDICT Analysis: The INNOVATE Study.
    Singh S; Rogers H; Kanber B; Clemente J; Pye H; Johnston EW; Parry T; Grey A; Dinneen E; Shaw G; Heavey S; Stopka-Farooqui U; Haider A; Freeman A; Giganti F; Atkinson D; Moore CM; Whitaker HC; Alexander DC; Panagiotaki E; Punwani S
    Radiology; 2022 Dec; 305(3):623-630. PubMed ID: 35916679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Added Value of Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Selecting Prostate Biopsy Candidates Among Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen and PI-RADS ≥3 Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: A Systematic Assessment by PI-RADS Score.
    Pellegrino F; Stabile A; Sorce G; Quarta L; Robesti D; Cannoletta D; Cirulli G; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Mazzone E; de Angelis M; Brembilla G; De Cobelli F; Salonia A; Montorsi F; Briganti A; Gandaglia G
    Eur Urol Focus; 2024 Jul; 10(4):634-640. PubMed ID: 37865591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Follow-up of Patients Included in Active Surveillance Protocol. Can PSA Density Discriminate Patients at Different Risk of Reclassification?
    Roscigno M; Stabile A; Lughezzani G; Pepe P; Galosi AB; Naselli A; Naspro R; Nicolai M; La Croce G; Aljoulani M; Perugini G; Guazzoni G; Montorsi F; Balzarini L; Sironi S; Da Pozzo LF
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2020 Dec; 18(6):e698-e704. PubMed ID: 32493676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection After a Negative Prebiopsy MRI Examination: Comparison of Biparametric Versus Multiparametric MRI.
    Gan JM; Kikano EG; Smith DA; Rao S; Podury R; Wang M; Durieux JC; Paspulati RM; Ponsky L; Ramaiya NH; Tirumani SH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 May; 218(5):859-866. PubMed ID: 34817189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unlocking Precision Enhancing Prostate Cancer Detection and Reducing Unnecessary Biopsies with Combined Prostate-Specific Antigen Density and PI-RADS Score.
    Hamidi N; Uzel T; Demirci A; Basar H
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2024 Oct; 34(10):1205-1210. PubMed ID: 39410690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic value of combining PI-RADS v2.1 with PSAD in clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Wei X; Xu J; Zhong S; Zou J; Cheng Z; Ding Z; Zhou X
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Oct; 47(10):3574-3582. PubMed ID: 35788882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk factor analysis and optimal cutoff value selection of PSAD for diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with negative mpMRI: results from a high-volume center in Southeast China.
    Lin S; Jiang W; Ding J; Hao S; Chen H; Xie L; Zheng X
    World J Surg Oncol; 2024 May; 22(1):140. PubMed ID: 38802859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of the combination of prostate-specific antigen derivatives with multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging scores on the negative predictive value of it in grey zone patients.
    Bostancı C; Demir DÖ
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2024 Apr; 48(3):238-245. PubMed ID: 37838326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PSA density is complementary to prostate MP-MRI PI-RADS scoring system for risk stratification of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Frisbie JW; Van Besien AJ; Lee A; Xu L; Wang S; Choksi A; Afzal MA; Naslund MJ; Lane B; Wong J; Wnorowski A; Siddiqui MM
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2023 Jun; 26(2):347-352. PubMed ID: 35523940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Who with suspected prostate cancer can benefit from Proclarix after multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging?
    Morote J; Campistol M; Regis L; Celma A; de Torres I; Semidey ME; Roche S; Mast R; Santamaria A; Planas J; Trilla E
    Int J Biol Markers; 2022 Jun; 37(2):218-223. PubMed ID: 35200058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do all patients with suspicious prostate cancer need Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging before prostate biopsy?
    Teixeira Anacleto S; Neves Alberto J; Carvalho Dias E; Sousa Passos P; Cerqueira Alves M
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2022 Mar; 94(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 35352522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combined Use of Prostate-specific Antigen Density and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Biopsy Decision Planning: A Retrospective Multi-institutional Study Using the Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcome Database (PROMOD).
    Falagario UG; Jambor I; Lantz A; Ettala O; Stabile A; Taimen P; Aronen HJ; Knaapila J; Perez IM; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Martini A; Cucchiara V; Picker W; Haug E; Ratnani P; Haines K; Lewis S; Sujit N; Selvaggio O; Sanguedolce F; Macarini L; Cormio L; Nordström T; Tewari A; Briganti A; Boström PJ; Carrieri G
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):971-979. PubMed ID: 32972896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a nomogram combining multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and PSA-related parameters to enhance the detection of clinically significant cancer across different region.
    Zhou Z; Liang Z; Zuo Y; Zhou Y; Yan W; Wu X; Ji Z; Li H; Hu M; Ma L
    Prostate; 2022 Apr; 82(5):556-565. PubMed ID: 35098557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.