BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36572129)

  • 1. Underwater versus conventional EMR of large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Rodríguez Sánchez J; Alvarez-Gonzalez MA; Pellisé M; Coto-Ugarte D; Uchima H; Aranda-Hernández J; Santiago García J; Marín-Gabriel JC; Riu Pons F; Nogales O; Carreño Macian R; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Hernández L; Patrón GO; Rodriguez-Tellez M; Redondo-Cerezo E; Sánchez Alonso M; Daca M; Valdivielso-Cortazar E; Álvarez Delgado A; Enguita M; Montori S; Albéniz E
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 May; 97(5):941-951.e2. PubMed ID: 36572129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Underwater versus conventional EMR for nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a randomized clinical trial.
    Lenz L; Martins B; Andrade de Paulo G; Kawaguti FS; Baba ER; Uemura RS; Gusmon CC; Geiger SN; Moura RN; Pennacchi C; Simas de Lima M; Safatle-Ribeiro AV; Hashimoto CL; Ribeiro U; Maluf-Filho F
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Mar; 97(3):549-558. PubMed ID: 36309072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Sessile or Flat Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Nagl S; Ebigbo A; Goelder SK; Roemmele C; Neuhaus L; Weber T; Braun G; Probst A; Schnoy E; Kafel AJ; Muzalyova A; Messmann H
    Gastroenterology; 2021 Nov; 161(5):1460-1474.e1. PubMed ID: 34371000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial : (UEMR vs. CEMR for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps).
    Zhang Z; Xia Y; Cui H; Yuan X; Wang C; Xie J; Tong Y; Wang W; Xu L
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Sep; 20(1):311. PubMed ID: 32967616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Intermediate-Size Colorectal Polyps.
    Yamashina T; Uedo N; Akasaka T; Iwatsubo T; Nakatani Y; Akamatsu T; Kawamura T; Takeuchi Y; Fujii S; Kusaka T; Shimokawa T
    Gastroenterology; 2019 Aug; 157(2):451-461.e2. PubMed ID: 30981791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting
    Zhang XQ; Sang JZ; Xu L; Mao XL; Li B; Zhu WL; Yang XY; Yu CH
    World J Gastroenterol; 2022 Dec; 28(45):6397-6409. PubMed ID: 36533110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sundaram S; Seth V; Jearth V; Giri S
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2023 May; 115(5):225-233. PubMed ID: 36148677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    de Souza MHG; do Espirito Santo PA; Maluf-Filho F; Lenz L
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Aug; 38(1):208. PubMed ID: 37552342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps.
    Schenck RJ; Jahann DA; Patrie JT; Stelow EB; Cox DG; Uppal DS; Sauer BG; Shami VM; Strand DS; Wang AY
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4174-4183. PubMed ID: 28342125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Underwater versus conventional EMR for colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Choi AY; Moosvi Z; Shah S; Roccato MK; Wang AY; Hamerski CM; Samarasena JB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Feb; 93(2):378-389. PubMed ID: 33068608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Depth of the cutting plane with underwater and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection: Post-hoc analysis of a randomized study.
    Matsueda K; Takeuchi Y; Kitamura M; Yamashina T; Akasaka T; Iwatsubo T; Nakatani Y; Akamatsu T; Kawamura T; Fujii S; Kusaka T; Shimokawa T; Uedo N
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Apr; 37(4):741-748. PubMed ID: 34978107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥10-mm colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li DF; Lai MG; Yang MF; Zou ZY; Xu J; Peng RM; Xiong F; Wei C; Zhang DG; Xu ZL; Wang LS; Yao J
    Endoscopy; 2021 Jun; 53(6):636-646. PubMed ID: 32767283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: a meta-analysis.
    Li P; Ma B; Gong S; Zhang X; Li W
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):3003-3013. PubMed ID: 32577813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Yamashina T; Hanaoka N; Setoyama T; Watanabe J; Banno M; Marusawa H
    Cureus; 2021 Aug; 13(8):e17261. PubMed ID: 34540484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Underwater Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Superficial Non-ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Lee JG; Lee SP; Jang HJ; Kae SH
    Dig Dis Sci; 2023 Apr; 68(4):1482-1491. PubMed ID: 36346490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Garg R; Singh A; Mohan BP; Mankaney G; Regueiro M; Chahal P
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Dec; 8(12):E1884-E1894. PubMed ID: 33269325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Underwater colorectal EMR: remodeling endoscopic mucosal resection.
    Curcio G; Granata A; Ligresti D; Tarantino I; Barresi L; Liotta R; Traina M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 May; 81(5):1238-42. PubMed ID: 25746979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for 20-30 mm colorectal polyps.
    Inoue T; Nakagawa K; Yamasaki Y; Shichijo S; Kanesaka T; Maekawa A; Higashino K; Uedo N; Ishihara R; Takeuchi Y
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 36(9):2549-2557. PubMed ID: 33724540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes of Gastrointestinal Polyps Resected Using Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (UEMR) Compared to Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (CEMR).
    Mouchli MA; Reddy S; Walsh C; Mir A; Bierle L; Chitnavis V; Yeaton P; Shakhatreh M
    Cureus; 2020 Nov; 12(11):e11485. PubMed ID: 33329981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feasibility and outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥ 10 mm colorectal polyps.
    Siau K; Ishaq S; Cadoni S; Kuwai T; Yusuf A; Suzuki N
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jun; 32(6):2656-2663. PubMed ID: 29101560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.