128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3657321)
1. Frequency analysis of Ionescu-Shiley prosthetic closing sounds in patients with normally functioning prostheses.
Brais M; Durand LG; Blanchard M; de Guise J; Guardo R; Keon WJ
Med Biol Eng Comput; 1986 Nov; 24(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 3657321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Spectral analysis of closing sounds produced by Ionescu-Shiley bioprosthetic aortic heart valves. Part 1. Optimal number of poles and zeros for parametric spectral analysis.
Cloutier G; Guardo R; Durand LG
Med Biol Eng Comput; 1987 Sep; 25(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 3446969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Phonocardiographic findings in patients with normally functioning Ionescu-Shiley prostheses.
Szkopiec RL; Desser KB; Benchimol A; Sheasby C
Am J Cardiol; 1983 Mar; 51(6):969-72. PubMed ID: 6829474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spectral analysis of closing sounds produced by Ionescu-Shiley bioprosthetic aortic heart valves. Part 2. Computer simulation of aortic closing sounds and estimation of their truncation level and signal-to-noise ratio.
Cloutier G; Grenier MC; Guardo R; Durand LG
Med Biol Eng Comput; 1987 Sep; 25(5):492-6. PubMed ID: 3446970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Spectral analysis of closing sounds produced by Ionescu-Shiley bioprosthetic aortic heart valves. Part 3. Performance of FFT-based and parametric methods for extracting diagnostic spectral parameters.
Cloutier G; Guardo R; Durand LG
Med Biol Eng Comput; 1987 Sep; 25(5):497-503. PubMed ID: 3446971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Automatic detection of sounds and murmurs in patients with Ionescu-Shiley aortic bioprostheses.
Baranek HL; Lee HC; Cloutier G; Durand LG
Med Biol Eng Comput; 1989 Sep; 27(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 2622226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-invasive assessment of the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft heart valve.
Robertson J; Burggraf G
Can J Cardiol; 1985; 1(4):241-50. PubMed ID: 3850772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical results of pericardial xenograft valves: the Ionescu-Shiley and Hancock valves.
Goldman B; Scully H; Tong C; Mandell R; Butany J; Azuma J; Schwartz L
Can J Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 4(6):328-32. PubMed ID: 3179796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chronic intravascular hemolysis after aortic valve replacement with Ionescu-Shiley xenograft: comparative study with Bjork-Shiley prosthesis.
Febres-Roman PR; Bourg WC; Crone RA; Davis RC; Williams TH
Am J Cardiol; 1980 Nov; 46(5):735-8. PubMed ID: 7435383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves.
Bove EL; Marvasti MA; Potts JL; Reger MJ; Zamora JL; Eich RH; Parker FB
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):750-5. PubMed ID: 4058047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vivo hemodynamics of prosthetic St. Jude Medical and Ionescu-Shiley heart valves analyzed by computer.
Kawachi Y; Tokunaga K; Watanabe Y; Nose Y; Nakamura M
Ann Thorac Surg; 1985 May; 39(5):456-61. PubMed ID: 3994447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medium-term follow-up of the Ionescu-Shiley heterograft valve.
Becker RM; Sandor L; Tindel M; Frater RW
Ann Thorac Surg; 1981 Aug; 32(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 7259353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years.
Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term follow-up of the Ionescu-Shiley mitral pericardial xenograft.
Gabbay S; Bortolotti U; Wasserman F; Tindel N; Factor SM; Frater RW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Nov; 88(5 Pt 1):758-63. PubMed ID: 6492841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Midpoint follow-up results of aortic valve replacement with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial bioprosthesis. Apropos of 109 patients].
Michel PL; Kassab R; Vahanian A; Belkaid M; Acar J
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1986 Jun; 79(7):1046-51. PubMed ID: 3096227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survival and bioprosthetic valve failure. Ten-year follow-up.
Teoh KH; Ivanov J; Weisel RD; Darcel IC; Rakowski H
Circulation; 1989 Sep; 80(3 Pt 1):I8-15. PubMed ID: 2766540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of experience with the Hancock and Ionescu-Shiley low-profile pericardial bioprostheses.
Reece IJ; Fisher J; Sethia B; MacArthur KJ; Wheatley DJ
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():232-6. PubMed ID: 3727691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
Mudra H; Rudolph W
Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ionescu-Shiley valve failure. I: Experience with 125 standard-profile explants.
Walley VM; Keon CA; Khalili M; Moher D; Campagna M; Keon WJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 1992 Jul; 54(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 1610221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term results of Ionescu-Shiley valve in the tricuspid position.
Eng J; Ravichandran PS; Kay PH; Murday AJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 1991 Feb; 51(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 1989531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]