These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Docking cyclic peptides formed by a disulfide bond through a hierarchical strategy. Tao H; Zhao X; Zhang K; Lin P; Huang SY Bioinformatics; 2022 Sep; 38(17):4109-4116. PubMed ID: 35801933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PLHINT: A knowledge-driven computational approach based on the intermolecular H bond interactions at the protein-ligand interface from docking solutions. Kumar SP J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Jan; 79():194-212. PubMed ID: 29241118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. NLDock: a Fast Nucleic Acid-Ligand Docking Algorithm for Modeling RNA/DNA-Ligand Complexes. Feng Y; Zhang K; Wu Q; Huang SY J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Sep; 61(9):4771-4782. PubMed ID: 34468128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. HPEPDOCK: a web server for blind peptide-protein docking based on a hierarchical algorithm. Zhou P; Jin B; Li H; Huang SY Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Jul; 46(W1):W443-W450. PubMed ID: 29746661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic Studies on the Protocol and Criteria for Selecting a Covalent Docking Tool. Wen C; Yan X; Gu Q; Du J; Wu D; Lu Y; Zhou H; Xu J Molecules; 2019 Jun; 24(11):. PubMed ID: 31185706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. pso@autodock: a fast flexible molecular docking program based on Swarm intelligence. Namasivayam V; Günther R Chem Biol Drug Des; 2007 Dec; 70(6):475-84. PubMed ID: 17986206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cov_DOX: A Method for Structure Prediction of Covalent Protein-Ligand Bindings. Wei L; Chen Y; Liu J; Rao L; Ren Y; Xu X; Wan J J Med Chem; 2022 Apr; 65(7):5528-5538. PubMed ID: 35353519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. HSYMDOCK: a docking web server for predicting the structure of protein homo-oligomers with Cn or Dn symmetry. Yan Y; Tao H; Huang SY Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Jul; 46(W1):W423-W431. PubMed ID: 29846641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Compromise in Docking Power of Liganded Crystal Structures of M Zajaček D; Dunárová A; Bucinsky L; Štekláč M J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Mar; 64(5):1628-1643. PubMed ID: 38408033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. istar: a web platform for large-scale protein-ligand docking. Li H; Leung KS; Ballester PJ; Wong MH PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85678. PubMed ID: 24475049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power. Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking. Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking. Huang SY; Zou X Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Covalent docking using autodock: Two-point attractor and flexible side chain methods. Bianco G; Forli S; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ Protein Sci; 2016 Jan; 25(1):295-301. PubMed ID: 26103917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of various optimization algorithms of protein-ligand docking programs by fitness accuracy. Guo L; Yan Z; Zheng X; Hu L; Yang Y; Wang J J Mol Model; 2014 Jul; 20(7):2251. PubMed ID: 24935106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]