These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36573762)

  • 1. Reliability and agreement of apparent chord mu measurements between static and dynamic evaluations.
    Martínez-Plaza E; Marcos M; López-de la Rosa A; López-Miguel A; Maldonado MJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2023 Jan; 49(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 36573762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repeatability and Agreement of Chord Mu between Scheimpflug Tomography and Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography.
    Kim NH; Kim HJ; Cho SC; Han KE
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2023 Dec; 37(6):510-517. PubMed ID: 37899279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating Changes in Apparent Chord Mu after Pharmacological Pupil Dilatation.
    Shouchane-Blum K; Reitblat O; Dadon J; Bahar I; Sella R
    Ophthalmic Res; 2023; 66(1):921-927. PubMed ID: 37231882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Precision (Repeatability and Reproducibility) and Agreement of Corneal Power Measurements Obtained by Topcon KR-1W and iTrace.
    Hua Y; Xu Z; Qiu W; Wu Q
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0147086. PubMed ID: 26752059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing Repeatability of Pupillometric Measurements in the Eyes of Refractive Surgery Candidates Using Infrared Pupillometer.
    Salah-Mabed I; Saad A; Gatinel D
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Aug; 33(8):552-557. PubMed ID: 28787521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of pupil center shift in refractive surgery candidates with caucasian eyes using infrared pupillometry.
    Mabed IS; Saad A; Guilbert E; Gatinel D
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Oct; 30(10):694-700. PubMed ID: 25291753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cylinder Axis Agreement: Unexpected Scenarios.
    Nabil KM
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2020; 14():977-984. PubMed ID: 32280192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repeatability of pupil size measurements with NIDEK OPD-Scan III in myopic children.
    Tan Q; Ng AL; Cheng GP; Woo VC; Cho P
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2021 Mar; 41(2):431-436. PubMed ID: 33294971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeatability and comparability of the Galilei-G4 and Cassini in measuring corneal power and astigmatism in normal and post-refractive surgery eyes.
    Mohamed M; Khan M; Kanakamedala A; Gupta I; Wang L; Koch D; Al-Mohtaseb Z
    Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):16141. PubMed ID: 34373485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repeatability of Wavefront Aberration Measurements With a Placido-Based Topographer in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes.
    Ortiz-Toquero S; Rodriguez G; de Juan V; Martin R
    J Refract Surg; 2016 May; 32(5):338-44. PubMed ID: 27163620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Pupil centroid shift: Marketing tool or essential clinical parameter?].
    Fischinger I; Seiler TG; Schmidinger G; Seiler T
    Ophthalmologe; 2015 Aug; 112(8):661-4. PubMed ID: 25566736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biometry and intraocular power calculation using a swept-source optical coherence tomography: A repeatability and agreement study.
    Hashemi H; Miraftab M; Panahi P; Asgari S
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 Aug; 70(8):2845-2850. PubMed ID: 35918927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility and normal values of static pupil diameters.
    Schröder S; Chashchina E; Janunts E; Cayless A; Langenbucher A
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 28(2):150-156. PubMed ID: 28885673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeatability and Agreement of Orbscan II, Pentacam HR, and Galilei Tomography Systems in Corneas With Keratoconus.
    Meyer JJ; Gokul A; Vellara HR; Prime Z; McGhee CN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Mar; 175():122-128. PubMed ID: 27993593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurements of anterior chamber depth, white-to-white distance, anterior chamber angle, and pupil diameter using two Scheimpflug imaging devices.
    Domínguez-Vicent A; Monsálvez-Romín D; Aguila-Carrasco AJ; García-Lázaro S; Montés-Micó R
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2014 Aug; 77(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 25410175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparisons of biometric parameters measurements by OPD-SCAN Ⅲ and Pentacam in cataract.
    Dong S; Xu R; Wang Y; Xiao W; Jiao Y
    Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2024 Feb; 45():103911. PubMed ID: 38043761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Precision of higher-order aberration measurements with a new Placido-disk topographer and Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor.
    López-Miguel A; Martínez-Almeida L; González-García MJ; Coco-Martín MB; Sobrado-Calvo P; Maldonado MJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 39(2):242-9. PubMed ID: 23142546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation of pupil sizes measured with a mesopic infrared pupillometer and a photopic topographer.
    Periman LM; Ambrosio R; Harrison DA; Wilson SE
    J Refract Surg; 2003; 19(5):555-9. PubMed ID: 14518744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intrasession repeatability and agreement of a new method to measure the foveal fixation axis.
    Garcia Espinilla O; Sanchez I; Martin R
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e14942. PubMed ID: 36860763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Anterior Segment Parameters and Axial Length Using Two Scheimpflug Devices with Integrated Optical Biometers.
    Supiyaphun C; Rattanasiri S; Jongkhajornpong P
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2020; 14():3487-3494. PubMed ID: 33122885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.