These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3657404)

  • 1. Baby Jane Doe's right of privacy from cradle to grave: infirmities of the 1984 Child Abuse Amendment.
    Baughman LK
    Med Law; 1987; 6(5):375-84. PubMed ID: 3657404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Infant Doe Amendments and parental privacy. Who makes the treatment decisions?
    Schnorr DL
    Med Law; 1987; 6(5):427-39. PubMed ID: 3657406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The antiabortion movement and Baby Jane Doe.
    Paige C; Karnofsky EB
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):255-69. PubMed ID: 3745839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are the 21-year-old Baby Doe rules misunderstood or mistaken?
    Kopelman LM
    Pediatrics; 2005 Mar; 115(3):797-802. PubMed ID: 15741390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supreme Court asked to review application of Rehabilitation Act to medical decisions.
    Paulus SM
    Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul; 1(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 2931399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The real challenge of "Baby Doe": considering the sanctity and quality of life.
    Goldworth A; Stevenson DK
    Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1989 Mar; 28(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 2920487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Baby Doe: nothing to fear but fear itself.
    Barnett TJ
    J Perinatol; 1990 Sep; 10(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 2145405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The U.S. Civil Rights Commission report, "Medical discrimination against children with disabilities": a brief commentary.
    Tucker BP
    Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):269-84. PubMed ID: 2149130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. United States Commission on Civil Rights--medical discrimination against children with disabilities: an abstract.
    Boyd DE; Thompson PJ
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1990; 6():379-410. PubMed ID: 10170563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Baby Doe's rights.
    Hentoff N
    Washington Post; 1984 Feb; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Civil rights and regulatory wrongs: the Reagan administration and the medical treatment of handicapped infants.
    Brown LD
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):231-54. PubMed ID: 3745838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The second Baby Doe rule.
    Kopelman LM
    JAMA; 1988 Feb; 259(6):843-4. PubMed ID: 3336197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Baby Doe, Congress and the states: challenging the federal treatment standard for impaired infants.
    Newman SA
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(1):1-60. PubMed ID: 2764010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The legal response to Babies Doe: an analytical prognosis.
    Rosenblum VG; Grant ER
    Issues Law Med; 1986 Mar; 1(5):391-404. PubMed ID: 3636287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Baby Doe's new guardians: federal policy brings nontreatment decisions out of hiding.
    Born MA
    KY Law J; 1986-1987; 75(3):659-75. PubMed ID: 11651897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Baby Doe regulations: views from perinatal social workers.
    York GY; Gallarno RM
    J Perinatol; 1990 Sep; 10(3):312-6. PubMed ID: 2145406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
    Horan DJ; Balch BJ
    Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abortion's shrinking majority.
    Murphy J
    Time; 1986 Jun; 127(25):30-1. PubMed ID: 11645638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Withholding medical treatment from infants: when is it child neglect?
    Knepper K
    Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1994-1995 Winter; 33(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11653286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assisted suicide and reproductive freedom: exploring some connections.
    Appleton SF
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1998; 76(1):15-36. PubMed ID: 11657576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.