These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3657406)

  • 1. The Infant Doe Amendments and parental privacy. Who makes the treatment decisions?
    Schnorr DL
    Med Law; 1987; 6(5):427-39. PubMed ID: 3657406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Baby Jane Doe's right of privacy from cradle to grave: infirmities of the 1984 Child Abuse Amendment.
    Baughman LK
    Med Law; 1987; 6(5):375-84. PubMed ID: 3657404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Baby Doe: nothing to fear but fear itself.
    Barnett TJ
    J Perinatol; 1990 Sep; 10(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 2145405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When love and abuse are not mutually exclusive: the need for government intervention.
    Obernberger S
    Issues Law Med; 1997; 12(4):355-81. PubMed ID: 9114605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Baby Doe cases: compromise and moral dilemma.
    Haddon PA
    Emory Law J; 1985; 34(3-4):545-615. PubMed ID: 11658790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The legal response to Babies Doe: an analytical prognosis.
    Rosenblum VG; Grant ER
    Issues Law Med; 1986 Mar; 1(5):391-404. PubMed ID: 3636287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Child Abuse Amendments of 1984 and their implementing regulations: a summary.
    Bopp J; Balch TJ
    Issues Law Med; 1985 Sep; 1(2):91-130. PubMed ID: 3899985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The case of Baby Jane Doe. 2. Baby Jane Doe in the courts.
    Steinbock B
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Feb; 14(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 6232243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Withholding medical treatment from infants: when is it child neglect?
    Knepper K
    Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1994-1995 Winter; 33(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11653286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The real challenge of "Baby Doe": considering the sanctity and quality of life.
    Goldworth A; Stevenson DK
    Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1989 Mar; 28(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 2920487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Life and death decisions in the nursery: standards and procedures for withholding lifesaving treatment from infants.
    Smith SR
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1125-86. PubMed ID: 11651775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
    Horan DJ; Balch BJ
    Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A moment in human development: legal protection, ethical standards and social policy on the selective non-treatment of handicapped neonates.
    Gostin L
    Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(1):31-78. PubMed ID: 3832944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Law, medicine, and morality: the cases of Infant Doe and Pamela Hamilton.
    Klinefelter D
    J Law Relig; 1984; 2(2):413-27. PubMed ID: 11651848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Infants with anencephaly, the ADA, and the Child Abuse Amendments.
    Crossley M
    Issues Law Med; 1996; 11(4):379-410. PubMed ID: 8934859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Baby Doe regulations: views from perinatal social workers.
    York GY; Gallarno RM
    J Perinatol; 1990 Sep; 10(3):312-6. PubMed ID: 2145406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forgoing medically provided nutrition and hydration in pediatric patients.
    Nelson LJ; Rushton CH; Cranford RE; Nelson RM; Glover JJ; Truog RD
    J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 7627300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. United States Commission on Civil Rights--medical discrimination against children with disabilities: an abstract.
    Boyd DE; Thompson PJ
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1990; 6():379-410. PubMed ID: 10170563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The outer limits of parental autonomy: withholding medical treatment from children.
    Vorys YV
    Ohio State Law J; 1981; 43(3):813-29. PubMed ID: 11658709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Baby Doe, Congress and the states: challenging the federal treatment standard for impaired infants.
    Newman SA
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(1):1-60. PubMed ID: 2764010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.