BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36574175)

  • 1. Comparison of the prognostic value of impaired stress myocardial blood flow, myocardial flow reserve, and myocardial flow capacity on low-dose Rubidium-82 SiPM PET/CT.
    Dietz M; Kamani CH; Allenbach G; Rubimbura V; Fournier S; Dunet V; Treglia G; Nicod Lalonde M; Schaefer N; Eeckhout E; Muller O; Prior JO
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2023 Aug; 30(4):1385-1395. PubMed ID: 36574175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Added prognostic value of myocardial blood flow quantitation in rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging.
    Farhad H; Dunet V; Bachelard K; Allenbach G; Kaufmann PA; Prior JO
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 14(12):1203-10. PubMed ID: 23660750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Value of SiPM PET in myocardial perfusion imaging using Rubidium-82.
    Koenders SS; van Dalen JA; Jager PL; Knollema S; Timmer JR; Mouden M; Slump CH; van Dijk JD
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 29(1):204-212. PubMed ID: 32410059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prognostic implications of myocardial perfusion imaging by 82-rubidium positron emission tomography in male and female patients with angina and no perfusion defects.
    Rauf M; Hansen KW; Galatius S; Wiinberg N; Brinth LS; Højstrup S; Talleruphuus U; Prescott E
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Jan; 24(2):212-222. PubMed ID: 36394344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impaired global myocardial flow dynamics despite normal left ventricular function and regional perfusion in chronic kidney disease: a quantitative analysis of clinical 82Rb PET/CT studies.
    Fukushima K; Javadi MS; Higuchi T; Bravo PE; Chien D; Lautamäki R; Merrill J; Nekolla SG; Bengel FM
    J Nucl Med; 2012 Jun; 53(6):887-93. PubMed ID: 22562499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impaired myocardial flow reserve on rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging predicts adverse outcomes in patients assessed for myocardial ischemia.
    Ziadi MC; Dekemp RA; Williams KA; Guo A; Chow BJ; Renaud JM; Ruddy TD; Sarveswaran N; Tee RE; Beanlands RS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Aug; 58(7):740-8. PubMed ID: 21816311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison and prognostic validation of multiple methods of quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb PET.
    Murthy VL; Lee BC; Sitek A; Naya M; Moody J; Polavarapu V; Ficaro EP; Di Carli MF
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Dec; 55(12):1952-8. PubMed ID: 25429160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated dynamic motion correction using normalized gradient fields for
    Lee BC; Moody JB; Poitrasson-Rivière A; Melvin AC; Weinberg RL; Corbett JR; Murthy VL; Ficaro EP
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 27(6):1982-1998. PubMed ID: 30406609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of Myocardial Blood Flow Estimation From Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac CT Compared With PET.
    Alessio AM; Bindschadler M; Busey JM; Shuman WP; Caldwell JH; Branch KR
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jun; 12(6):e008323. PubMed ID: 31195817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blood pool and tissue phase patient motion effects on
    Lee BC; Moody JB; Poitrasson-Rivière A; Melvin AC; Weinberg RL; Corbett JR; Ficaro EP; Murthy VL
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 26(6):1918-1929. PubMed ID: 29572594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dependency of cardiac rubidium-82 imaging quantitative measures on age, gender, vascular territory, and software in a cardiovascular normal population.
    Sunderland JJ; Pan XB; Declerck J; Menda Y
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2015 Feb; 22(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 25294436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incremental prognostic value of digital positron emission tomography derived myocardial flow reserve: A prospective cohort study.
    Ahmed AI; Al Rifai M; Alahdab F; Saad JM; Han Y; Alfawara MS; Nabi F; Mahmarian JJ; Al-Mallah MH
    Int J Cardiol; 2023 Jan; 371():465-471. PubMed ID: 36096273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative myocardial perfusion
    Freitag MT; Bremerich J; Wild D; Haaf P; Zellweger MJ; Caobelli F
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Apr; 29(2):464-473. PubMed ID: 32676910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 82-rubidium positron emission tomography determined myocardial flow reserve and outcomes following cardiac revascularisation - A multicentre registry study.
    Toftholm MH; Højstrup S; Talleruphuus U; Marner L; Bjerking L; Jakobsen L; Christiansen EH; Bouchelouche K; Galatius S; Prescott E; Skak-Hansen KW
    Int J Cardiol; 2024 Jun; 405():131865. PubMed ID: 38365013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-Term Prognostic Value of
    Fox JJ; Mauguen A; Ito K; Gupta D; Yu A; Schindler TH; Strauss HW; Schöder H
    J Nucl Med; 2023 May; 64(5):791-796. PubMed ID: 36604182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging and [
    Everaars H; van Diemen PA; Bom MJ; Schumacher SP; de Winter RW; van de Ven PM; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Hofman MBM; van der Geest RJ; Götte MJ; van Rossum AC; Nijveldt R; Danad I; Driessen RS; Knaapen P
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Jul; 47(7):1688-1697. PubMed ID: 31822958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Myocardial perfusion quantification with Rb-82 PET: good interobserver agreement of Carimas software on global, regional, and segmental levels.
    Nesterov SV; Deshayes E; Juarez-Orozco LE; deKemp RA; Sciagrà R; Malaspina S; Settimo L; Han C; Ryzhkova DV; Kostina IS; Gwet KL; Prior JO; Knuuti JM
    Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Jun; 36(6):507-514. PubMed ID: 35192160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic value of PET-measured longitudinal flow gradient for the identification of coronary artery disease.
    Valenta I; Quercioli A; Schindler TH
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Apr; 7(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 24631507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simplified quantification of
    Chang CY; Hung GU; Hsu B; Yang BH; Chang CW; Hu LH; Huang WS; Wang HE; Wu TC; Liu RS
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 27(3):819-828. PubMed ID: 30324328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of prompt gamma compensation on myocardial blood flow measurements with rubidium-82 dynamic PET.
    Armstrong IS; Memmott MJ; Tonge CM; Arumugam P
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 25(2):596-605. PubMed ID: 27624818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.