212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36574507)
1. Assessing the European Electric-Mobility Transition: Emissions from Electric Vehicle Manufacturing and Use in Relation to the EU Greenhouse Gas Emission Targets.
Tang C; Tukker A; Sprecher B; Mogollón JM
Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Jan; 57(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 36574507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of electric versus combustion vehicles from 2018 to 2030 in the US.
Challa R; Kamath D; Anctil A
J Environ Manage; 2022 Apr; 308():114592. PubMed ID: 35121453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Greenhouse gas emission benefits of adopting new energy vehicles in Suzhou City, China: A case study.
Da C; Gu X; Lu C; Hua R; Chang X; Cheng Y; Qian F; Wang Y
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Oct; 29(50):76286-76297. PubMed ID: 35668254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Which type of electric vehicle is worth promoting mostly in the context of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality? A case study for a metropolis in China.
Yu Y; Xu H; Cheng J; Wan F; Ju L; Liu Q; Liu J
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Sep; 837():155626. PubMed ID: 35504393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transport oil product consumption and GHG emission reduction potential in China: An electric vehicle-based scenario analysis.
Zheng Y; Li S; Xu S
PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222448. PubMed ID: 31525217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Private versus Shared, Automated Electric Vehicles for U.S. Personal Mobility: Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Grid Integration, and Cost Impacts.
Sheppard CJR; Jenn AT; Greenblatt JB; Bauer GS; Gerke BF
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Mar; 55(5):3229-3239. PubMed ID: 33566604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Provincial Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Gasoline and Plug-in Electric Vehicles in China: Comparison from the Consumption-Based Electricity Perspective.
Gan Y; Lu Z; He X; Hao C; Wang Y; Cai H; Wang M; Elgowainy A; Przesmitzki S; Bouchard J
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 May; 55(10):6944-6956. PubMed ID: 33945267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S. Light-Duty Transport in Line with the 2 °C Target.
Zhu Y; Skerlos S; Xu M; Cooper DR
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jul; 55(13):9326-9338. PubMed ID: 34106694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electricity carbon intensity in European Member States: Impacts on GHG emissions of electric vehicles.
Moro A; Lonza L
Transp Res D Transp Environ; 2018 Oct; 64():5-14. PubMed ID: 30740029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact assessment of crude oil mix, electricity generation mix, and vehicle technology on road freight emission reduction in China.
Jiang Z; Yan R; Gong Z; Guan G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(10):27763-27781. PubMed ID: 36385332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Alternative Fuel Vehicle Adoption Increases Fleet Gasoline Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions under United States Corporate Average Fuel Economy Policy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards.
Jenn A; Azevedo IM; Michalek JJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Mar; 50(5):2165-74. PubMed ID: 26867100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Should India Move toward Vehicle Electrification? Assessing Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas and Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions of Alternative and Conventional Fuel Vehicles in India.
Peshin T; Sengupta S; Azevedo IML
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jul; 56(13):9569-9582. PubMed ID: 35696339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of the USPS Next-Generation Delivery Vehicle Fleet.
Woody M; Vaishnav P; Craig MT; Keoleian GA
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Sep; 56(18):13391-13397. PubMed ID: 36018721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrifying passenger road transport in India requires near-term electricity grid decarbonisation.
Abdul-Manan AFN; Gordillo Zavaleta V; Agarwal AK; Kalghatgi G; Amer AA
Nat Commun; 2022 Apr; 13(1):2095. PubMed ID: 35440110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Ontario's Electricity System and the Implications of Electric Vehicle Charging.
Gai Y; Wang A; Pereira L; Hatzopoulou M; Posen ID
Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Jul; 53(13):7903-7912. PubMed ID: 31244061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cradle-to-Gate Emissions from a Commercial Electric Vehicle Li-Ion Battery: A Comparative Analysis.
Kim HC; Wallington TJ; Arsenault R; Bae C; Ahn S; Lee J
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 50(14):7715-22. PubMed ID: 27303957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Dynamic Fleet Model of U.S Light-Duty Vehicle Lightweighting and Associated Greenhouse Gas Emissions from 2016 to 2050.
Milovanoff A; Kim HC; De Kleine R; Wallington TJ; Posen ID; MacLean HL
Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Feb; 53(4):2199-2208. PubMed ID: 30682256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. China Electricity Generation Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity in 2030: Implications for Electric Vehicles.
Shen W; Han W; Wallington TJ; Winkler SL
Environ Sci Technol; 2019 May; 53(10):6063-6072. PubMed ID: 31021614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Greenhouse gas emissions and peak trend of commercial vehicles in China.
Wang X; Dai M; Wang W; Gao Y; Qi T; Dong X; Ren P; Ding N
J Environ Manage; 2023 Apr; 331():117262. PubMed ID: 36731334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Climate and environmental effects of electric vehicles versus compressed natural gas vehicles in China: a life-cycle analysis at provincial level.
Huo H; Zhang Q; Liu F; He K
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Feb; 47(3):1711-8. PubMed ID: 23276251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
