These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36575387)

  • 1. Critical thinking development in undergraduate midwifery students: an Australian validation study using Rasch analysis.
    Carter AG; Müller A; Gray M; Bloxsome D; Graham K; Dooley D; Sweet L
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Dec; 22(1):972. PubMed ID: 36575387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and psychometric testing of the Carter Assessment of Critical Thinking in Midwifery (Preceptor/Mentor version).
    Carter AG; Creedy DK; Sidebotham M
    Midwifery; 2016 Mar; 34():141-149. PubMed ID: 26719194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring critical thinking in pre-registration midwifery students: A multi-method approach.
    Carter AG; Creedy DK; Sidebotham M
    Nurse Educ Today; 2018 Feb; 61():169-174. PubMed ID: 29216601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Critical thinking evaluation in reflective writing: Development and testing of Carter Assessment of Critical Thinking in Midwifery (Reflection).
    Carter AG; Creedy DK; Sidebotham M
    Midwifery; 2017 Nov; 54():73-80. PubMed ID: 28866350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Critical thinking skills in midwifery practice: Development of a self-assessment tool for students.
    Carter AG; Creedy DK; Sidebotham M
    Midwifery; 2017 Jul; 50():184-192. PubMed ID: 28472740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the Midwifery Student Evaluation of Practice (MidSTEP) tool using Rasch analysis.
    Gamble J; Pallant J; Creedy DK
    Nurse Educ Today; 2022 Jan; 108():105174. PubMed ID: 34741914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of tools used to measure critical thinking development in nursing and midwifery undergraduate students: a systematic review.
    Carter AG; Creedy DK; Sidebotham M
    Nurse Educ Today; 2015 Jul; 35(7):864-74. PubMed ID: 25817987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using Rasch analysis to identify midwifery students' learning about providing breastfeeding support.
    Blackman I; Sweet L; Byrne J
    Women Birth; 2015 Sep; 28(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 25754763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Midwifery Student Evaluation of Practice: The MidSTEP tool - Perceptions of clinical learning experiences.
    Griffiths M; Fenwick J; Gamble J; Creedy DK
    Women Birth; 2020 Sep; 33(5):440-447. PubMed ID: 31668614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Midwifery professional placement: Undergraduate students' experiences with novice and expert preceptors.
    Thomas KJ; Yeganeh L; Vlahovich J; Willey SM
    Nurse Educ Today; 2023 Dec; 131():105976. PubMed ID: 37769601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of data using RASCH analysis in a tool measuring changes in critical thinking in nursing students.
    Jacob ER; Duffield C; Jacob AM
    Nurse Educ Today; 2019 May; 76():196-199. PubMed ID: 30825731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using root cause analysis to promote critical thinking in final year Bachelor of Midwifery students.
    Carter AG; Sidebotham M; Creedy DK; Fenwick J; Gamble J
    Nurse Educ Today; 2014 Jun; 34(6):1018-23. PubMed ID: 24238823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developing and testing the EPICC Spiritual Care Competency Self-Assessment Tool for student nurses and midwives.
    Giske T; Schep-Akkerman A; Bø B; Cone PH; Moene Kuven B; Mcsherry W; Owusu B; Ueland V; Lassche-Scheffer J; van Leeuwen R; Ross L
    J Clin Nurs; 2023 Apr; 32(7-8):1148-1162. PubMed ID: 35285563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of teaching methods used to develop critical thinking in nursing and midwifery undergraduate students: A systematic review of the literature.
    Carter AG; Creedy DK; Sidebotham M
    Nurse Educ Today; 2016 May; 40():209-18. PubMed ID: 27125175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Examining the transformative potential of emotion in education: A new measure of nursing and midwifery students' emotional learning in first peoples' cultural safety.
    Mills K; Creedy DK; Sunderland N; Allen J
    Nurse Educ Today; 2021 May; 100():104854. PubMed ID: 33713988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Turkish validity and reliability study of midwifery student evaluation of practice (MidSTEP) tool.
    Aktaş D; Yilmaz S
    Midwifery; 2024 Feb; 129():103907. PubMed ID: 38118287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and testing of the Midwifery Perceptions and Assessment of Clinical Teaching (MidPaACT) tool.
    Griffiths M; Creedy DK; Donnellan-Fernandez R; Carter AG
    Nurse Educ Today; 2023 Nov; 130():105948. PubMed ID: 37660587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bachelor of Midwifery students' experiences of achieving competencies: the role of the midwife preceptor.
    Licqurish S; Seibold C
    Midwifery; 2008 Dec; 24(4):480-9. PubMed ID: 17869393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of the MidACE tool - Students' perceptions of the Midwifery Academic role in clinical environments.
    Griffiths M; Creedy DK; Carter AG
    Women Birth; 2021 Feb; 34(1):e14-e22. PubMed ID: 32576454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a filmed clinical scenario as a teaching resource for an introductory pharmacology unit for undergraduate health students: A pilot study.
    East L; Hutchinson M
    Nurse Educ Today; 2015 Dec; 35(12):1252-6. PubMed ID: 25979800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.