These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36575805)

  • 1. Induction of labour and emergency caesarean section in English maternity services: Examining outcomes is needed before recommending changes in practice.
    Seijmonsbergen-Schermers A; Peters LL; Downe S; Dahlen H; de Jonge A
    BJOG; 2023 Apr; 130(5):542-543. PubMed ID: 36575805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of elective labour induction and elective caesarean section in low-risk pregnancies between 37 and 41 weeks' gestation.
    Dunne C; Da Silva O; Schmidt G; Natale R
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Dec; 31(12):1124-30. PubMed ID: 20085677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevalence of spontaneous, induced labour or planned caesarean section and factors associated with caesarean section in low-risk women in southern Brazil.
    Velho MB; Brüggemann OM; McCourt C; Freitas PF; Gama SGND; Costa R; d'Orsi E
    Midwifery; 2019 Dec; 79():102530. PubMed ID: 31479799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring unwarranted clinical variation: The attitudes of midwives and obstetric medical staff regarding induction of labour and planned caesarean section.
    Dominiek C; Natasha D; Foureur M; Spear V; Amanda H
    Women Birth; 2021 Jul; 34(4):352-361. PubMed ID: 32674990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maternal childbirth experience and induction of labour in each mode of delivery: a retrospective seven-year cohort study of 95,051 parturients in Finland.
    Joensuu JM; Saarijärvi H; Rouhe H; Gissler M; Ulander VM; Heinonen S; Torkki P; Mikkola TS
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Jun; 22(1):508. PubMed ID: 35739476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Induction of labour versus expectant management at term by subgroups of maternal age: an individual patient data meta-analysis.
    Walker KF; Malin G; Wilson P; Thornton JG
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Feb; 197():1-5. PubMed ID: 26686589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Labour outcomes in caseload midwifery and standard care: a register-based cohort study.
    Jepsen I; Juul S; Foureur MJ; Sørensen EE; Nohr EA
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Dec; 18(1):481. PubMed ID: 30522453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An audit about labour induction, using prostaglandin, in women with a scarred uterus.
    Cogan A; Barlow P; Benali N; Murillo D; Manigart Y; Belhomme J; Rozenberg S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1399-406. PubMed ID: 22836816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do you pay to go private?: a single centre comparison of induction of labour and caesarean section rates in private versus public patients.
    Craven S; Byrne F; Mahony R; Walsh JM
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Dec; 20(1):746. PubMed ID: 33261564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Delivery after caesarean section: review of 2176 consecutive cases.
    Molloy BG; Sheil O; Duignan NM
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 Jun; 294(6588):1645-7. PubMed ID: 3113567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictors of perinatal outcomes and economic costs for late-term induction of labour.
    Oros D; Garcia-Simon R; Clemente J; Fabre E; Romero MA; Montañes A
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 56(3):286-290. PubMed ID: 28600035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of timing of admission in labour and management of labour on method of birth: results from a randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery (COSMOS trial).
    Davey MA; McLachlan HL; Forster D; Flood M
    Midwifery; 2013 Dec; 29(12):1297-302. PubMed ID: 23890679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does induction of labour increase the risk of caesarean section? A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials in women with intact membranes.
    Wood S; Cooper S; Ross S
    BJOG; 2014 May; 121(6):674-85; discussion 685. PubMed ID: 23834460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Induction of labour vs. spontaneous vaginal delivery in twin pregnancy after 36 weeks of gestation.
    Tavares MV; Domingues AP; Nunes F; Tavares M; Fonseca E; Moura P
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Jan; 37(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 27925470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Obstetric outcomes associated with induction of labour after caesarean section.
    Gobillot S; Ghenassia A; Coston AL; Gillois P; Equy V; Michy T; Hoffmann P
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Dec; 47(10):539-543. PubMed ID: 30253940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Elective induction of labour in low risk nulliparous women at term: Caution is needed.
    Ghi T; Dall'Asta A; Fieni S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Aug; 239():64-66. PubMed ID: 31195165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trends and characteristics of women undergoing induction of labour in a tertiary hospital setting: A cross-sectional study.
    Artuso H; Davis DL
    Women Birth; 2022 Mar; 35(2):e181-e187. PubMed ID: 34034992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Induction of labour as compared with spontaneous labour in low-risk women: A multicenter study in Catalonia.
    Espada-Trespalacios X; Ojeda F; Nebot Rodrigo N; Rodriguez-Biosca A; Rodriguez Coll P; Martin-Arribas A; Escuriet R
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2021 Sep; 29():100648. PubMed ID: 34332215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Differences in cesarean sections between spontaneous and induced labour].
    Hernández Martínez A; Pascual Pedreño AI; Baño Garnés AB; Melero Jiménez MR; Molina Alarcón M
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2014; 88(3):383-93. PubMed ID: 25028306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. COLOSTRUM CHANGES IN PREGNANCY AND LABOUR.
    JONES JB
    J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw; 1964 Oct; 71():724-6. PubMed ID: 14212198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.