These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36575830)

  • 1. Development and application of an efficient genomic mating method to maximize the production performances of three-way crossbred pigs.
    Tang Z; Yin L; Yin D; Zhang H; Fu Y; Zhou G; Zhao Y; Wang Z; Liu X; Li X; Zhao S
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Jan; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 36575830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A bivariate genomic model with additive, dominance and inbreeding depression effects for sire line and three-way crossbred pigs.
    Christensen OF; Nielsen B; Su G; Xiang T; Madsen P; Ostersen T; Velander I; Strathe AB
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Aug; 51(1):45. PubMed ID: 31426753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparisons of specific crosses from Duroc-Landrace, Yorkshire-Landrace and Hampshire-Landrace sows managed in two types of gestation systems: pig performance.
    Kuhlers DL; Jungst SB; Little JA
    J Anim Sci; 1989 Oct; 67(10):2595-602. PubMed ID: 2808165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genomic prediction in pigs using data from a commercial crossbred population: insights from the Duroc x (Landrace x Yorkshire) three-way crossbreeding system.
    Liu S; Yao T; Chen D; Xiao S; Chen L; Zhang Z
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Mar; 55(1):21. PubMed ID: 36977978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of selected and control lines of Duroc and Yorkshire pigs and their reciprocal crossbred progeny.
    Bereskin B
    J Anim Sci; 1983 Oct; 57(4):867-78. PubMed ID: 6643303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the NE Index line. II. Growth and carcass responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters.
    Petry DB; Holl JW; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Jul; 82(7):1895-902. PubMed ID: 15309934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Growth performance for four breeds of swine: crossbred females and purebred and crossbred boars.
    McLaren DG; Buchanan DS; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1987 Jan; 64(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 3818493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model.
    Esfandyari H; Bijma P; Henryon M; Christensen OF; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):40. PubMed ID: 27276993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of Duroc, Meishan, Fengjing, and Minzhu boars on productivity of mates and growth of first-cross progeny.
    Young LD
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jul; 70(7):2020-9. PubMed ID: 1644674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissecting total genetic variance into additive and dominance components of purebred and crossbred pig traits.
    Tusell L; Gilbert H; Vitezica ZG; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
    Animal; 2019 Nov; 13(11):2429-2439. PubMed ID: 31120005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic diversity, extent of linkage disequilibrium and persistence of gametic phase in Canadian pigs.
    Grossi DA; Jafarikia M; Brito LF; Buzanskas ME; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):6. PubMed ID: 28109261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Heterosis and recombination effects on pig growth and carcass traits.
    Cassady JP; Young LD; Leymaster KA
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2286-302. PubMed ID: 12350006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of single-step genomic evaluation for crossbred performance in pig.
    Xiang T; Nielsen B; Su G; Legarra A; Christensen OF
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Mar; 94(3):936-48. PubMed ID: 27065256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.
    Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Nov; 48(1):92. PubMed ID: 27887565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproductive performance for four breeds of swine: crossbred females and purebred and crossbred boars.
    Buchanan DS; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Oct; 59(4):948-56. PubMed ID: 6511683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An embryo transfer study of reciprocal cross differences in growth and carcass traits of Duroc and Landrace pigs.
    Wilken TM; Lo LL; McLaren DG; Fernando RL; Dziuk PJ
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2349-58. PubMed ID: 1506298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for carcass and meat quality traits in commercial crossbred pigs.
    Miar Y; Plastow GS; Moore SS; Manafiazar G; Charagu P; Kemp RA; Van Haandel B; Huisman AE; Zhang CY; McKay RM; Bruce HL; Wang Z
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Jul; 92(7):2869-84. PubMed ID: 24778330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparisons of specific crosses from Yorkshire-Landrace, Chester White-Landrace and Chester White-Yorkshire sows.
    Kuhlers DL; Jungst SB; Moore RA
    J Anim Sci; 1988 May; 66(5):1132-8. PubMed ID: 3397340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genomic analyses provide insights into breed-of-origin effects from purebreds on three-way crossbred pigs.
    Lin Y; Tang Q; Li Y; He M; Jin L; Ma J; Wang X; Long K; Huang Z; Li X; Gu Y; Li M
    PeerJ; 2019; 7():e8009. PubMed ID: 31737448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic analyses of growth, real-time ultrasound, carcass, and pork quality traits in Duroc and Landrace pigs: I. Breed effects.
    Lo LL; McLaren DG; McKeith FK; Fernando RL; Novakofski J
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2373-86. PubMed ID: 1506301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.