These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36575830)

  • 21. Evaluation of Duroc- vs. Pietrain-sired pigs for growth and composition.
    Edwards DB; Tempelman RJ; Bates RO
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Feb; 84(2):266-75. PubMed ID: 16424252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of three-breed and backcross swine for litter productivity and postweaning performance.
    Wilson ER; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1981 Jan; 52(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 7240036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Genetic relationships between boar feed efficiency and sow piglet production, body condition score, and stayability in Norwegian Landrace pigs.
    Martinsen KH; Ødegård J; Aasmundstad T; Olsen D; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Aug; 94(8):3159-3168. PubMed ID: 27695777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Adjustment of pig or litter weights to a 21-day basis in Duroc, Landrace, and crossbred swine.
    Irvin KM; Peterson GA; Stewart ND
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Feb; 69(2):472-7. PubMed ID: 2016176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of Duroc- vs. Pietrain-sired pigs for carcass and meat quality measures.
    Edwards DB; Bates RO; Osburn WN
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Aug; 81(8):1895-9. PubMed ID: 12926770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genetic correlations between feed efficiency traits, and growth performance and carcass traits in purebred and crossbred pigs.
    Godinho RM; Bergsma R; Silva FF; Sevillano CA; Knol EF; Lopes MS; Lopes PS; Bastiaansen JWM; Guimarães SEF
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Apr; 96(3):817-829. PubMed ID: 29378008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Joint analysis of longitudinal feed intake and single recorded production traits in pigs using a novel Horizontal model.
    Shirali M; Strathe AB; Mark T; Nielsen B; Jensen J
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Mar; 95(3):1050-1062. PubMed ID: 28380533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nurse capacity, fertility, and litter size in crossbred sows and genetic correlation to purebred sow information.
    Nielsen B; Christensen OF; Velander I
    J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):1827-33. PubMed ID: 27285680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genomic BLUP including additive and dominant variation in purebreds and F1 crossbreds, with an application in pigs.
    Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Elsen JM; Misztal I; Herring W; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():6. PubMed ID: 26825279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sow productivity comparisons for four breeds of swine: purebred and crossbred litters.
    Gaugler HR; Buchanan DS; Hintz RL; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Oct; 59(4):941-7. PubMed ID: 6542563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prediction of performance of progeny from test station boars.
    van Alst G; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jul; 70(7):2078-85. PubMed ID: 1644681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Duroc boars have lower progeny mortality and lower fertility than Pietrain boars.
    Pedersen MLM; Velander IH; Nielsen MBF; Lundeheim N; Nielsen B
    Transl Anim Sci; 2019 Mar; 3(2):885-892. PubMed ID: 32704853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Maternal effects on traits measured during postweaning performance test of swine from four breeds.
    Johnson ZB; Chewning JJ; Nugent RA
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Jun; 80(6):1470-7. PubMed ID: 12078726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Heterosis losses resulting from incorrect matings in a three-breed rotational crossbreeding system in pigs.
    Jungst SB; Kuhlers DL; Little JA
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Jan; 76(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 9464881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of breed of sire on growth of gilts and on subsequent reproductive performance.
    Hale OM; Bondari K
    Growth; 1985; 49(3):367-74. PubMed ID: 4085904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Purebred and Crossbred Genomic Evaluation and Mate Allocation Strategies To Exploit Dominance in Pig Crossbreeding Schemes.
    González-Diéguez D; Tusell L; Bouquet A; Legarra A; Vitezica ZG
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Aug; 10(8):2829-2841. PubMed ID: 32554752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Genetic parameters between slaughter pig efficiency and growth rate of different body tissues estimated by computed tomography in live boars of Landrace and Duroc.
    Gjerlaug-Enger E; Kongsro J; Odegård J; Aass L; Vangen O
    Animal; 2012 Jan; 6(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 22436149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Economic evaluation of alternative crossbreeding systems involving four breeds of swine. II. System efficiency.
    McLaren DG; Buchanan DS; Williams JE
    J Anim Sci; 1987 Oct; 65(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 3667465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of slaughter age on carcass traits and meat quality of crossbred (Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire) finishing pigs.
    Guo Z; Chen X; Chen D; Li M; Yin J; Yu B; He J; Huang Z
    Anim Biotechnol; 2022 Apr; 33(2):339-345. PubMed ID: 33928841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Survival, body weights, feed efficiency, and carcass traits of 3/4 white composite and 1/4 Duroc, 1/4 Meishan, 1/4 Fengjing, or 1/4 Minzhu pigs.
    Young LD
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Dec; 73(12):3534-42. PubMed ID: 8655426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.