These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36575830)

  • 41. Identification and validation of a regulatory mutation upstream of the BMP2 gene associated with carcass length in pigs.
    Li J; Peng S; Zhong L; Zhou L; Yan G; Xiao S; Ma J; Huang L
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Dec; 53(1):94. PubMed ID: 34906088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the Nebraska Index line. I. Reproductive responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters.
    Petry DB; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Apr; 82(4):1000-6. PubMed ID: 15080320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. An experimental comparison of equivalent terminal and rotational crossbreeding systems in swine: sow and litter performance.
    Kuhlers DL; Jungst SB; Little JA
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Mar; 72(3):584-90. PubMed ID: 8181973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Using test station and on-farm data for the genetic evaluation of Pietrain boars used on Landrace sows for growth performance.
    Dufrasne M; Rustin M; Jaspart V; Wavreile J; Gengler N
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Dec; 89(12):3872-80. PubMed ID: 21803975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Genetic correlations between growth performance and carcass traits of purebred and crossbred pigs raised in tropical and temperate climates1.
    Godinho RM; Bergsma R; Silva FF; Sevillano CA; Knol EF; Komen H; Guimarães SEF; Lopes MS; Bastiaansen JWM
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Sep; 97(9):3648-3657. PubMed ID: 31278865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Technical note: Genomic evaluation for crossbred performance in a single-step approach with metafounders.
    Xiang T; Christensen OF; Legarra A
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1472-1480. PubMed ID: 28464109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Maternal performance of Duroc, Hampshire and Landrace backcross gilts fed normal and high fiber diets during postweaning growth.
    Stewart TS; Drewry KJ
    J Anim Sci; 1983 Sep; 57(3):565-76. PubMed ID: 6313586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Genome-wide association studies for seven production traits highlight genomic regions useful to dissect dry-cured ham quality and production traits in Duroc heavy pigs.
    Bertolini F; Schiavo G; Galimberti G; Bovo S; D'Andrea M; Gallo M; Buttazzoni L; Rothschild MF; Fontanesi L
    Animal; 2018 Sep; 12(9):1777-1784. PubMed ID: 29706143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Performance of Duroc and Yorkshire boars and gilts and reciprocal breed crosses.
    Bereskin B; Steele NC
    J Anim Sci; 1986 Apr; 62(4):918-26. PubMed ID: 3710933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Survival, body weights, feed efficiency, and carcass traits of 7/8 White Composite and 1/8 Duroc, 1/8 Meishan, 1/8 Fengjing, or 1/8 Minzhu pigs.
    Young LD
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Jun; 76(6):1550-8. PubMed ID: 9655574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
    Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
    Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Reproduction of F1 Meishan, Fengjing, Minzhu, and Duroc gilts and sows.
    Young LD
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Mar; 73(3):711-21. PubMed ID: 7608003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Selective genotyping and phenotypic data inclusion strategies of crossbred progeny for combined crossbred and purebred selection in swine breeding.
    See GM; Mote BE; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Mar; 99(3):. PubMed ID: 33560334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Feed intake, average daily gain, feed efficiency, and real-time ultrasound traits in Duroc pigs: I. Genetic parameter estimation and accuracy of genomic prediction.
    Jiao S; Maltecca C; Gray KA; Cassady JP
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Jun; 92(6):2377-86. PubMed ID: 24671579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparisons of specific crosses from Duroc, Hampshire and Spot backcross sows.
    Kuhlers DL; Jungst SB; Little JA
    J Anim Sci; 1985 Mar; 60(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 4039311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of mass selection for increased weight at two ages on growth rate and carcass composition of Duroc-Landrace pigs.
    Bullock KD; Kuhlers DL; Jungst SB
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Apr; 69(4):1409-19. PubMed ID: 2071506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Meat and nutritional quality comparison of purebred and crossbred pigs.
    Zhang J; Chai J; Luo Z; He H; Chen L; Liu X; Zhou Q
    Anim Sci J; 2018 Jan; 89(1):202-210. PubMed ID: 28856768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Genome-wide association analyses for meat quality traits in Chinese Erhualian pigs and a Western Duroc × (Landrace × Yorkshire) commercial population.
    Liu X; Xiong X; Yang J; Zhou L; Yang B; Ai H; Ma H; Xie X; Huang Y; Fang S; Xiao S; Ren J; Ma J; Huang L
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 May; 47(1):44. PubMed ID: 25962760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Improved dairy cattle mating plans at herd level using genomic information.
    Bérodier M; Berg P; Meuwissen T; Boichard D; Brochard M; Ducrocq V
    Animal; 2021 Jan; 15(1):100016. PubMed ID: 33516018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Genomic selection for crossbred performance accounting for breed-specific effects.
    Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; Hidalgo AM; van Arendonk JAM; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JWM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jun; 49(1):51. PubMed ID: 28651536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.