196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36577626)
1. Validating a double Gaussian source model for small proton fields in a commercial Monte-Carlo dose calculation engine.
Kugel F; Wulff J; Bäumer C; Janson M; Kretschmer J; Brodbek L; Behrends C; Verbeek N; Looe HK; Poppe B; Timmermann B
Z Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 33(4):529-541. PubMed ID: 36577626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Commissioning dose computation models for spot scanning proton beams in water for a commercially available treatment planning system.
Zhu XR; Poenisch F; Lii M; Sawakuchi GO; Titt U; Bues M; Song X; Zhang X; Li Y; Ciangaru G; Li H; Taylor MB; Suzuki K; Mohan R; Gillin MT; Sahoo N
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041723. PubMed ID: 23556893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nuclear halo measurements for accurate prediction of field size factor in a Varian ProBeam proton PBS system.
Harms J; Chang CW; Zhang R; Lin L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 31793202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technical note: Evaluation and second check of a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine for small-field apertures in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Holmes J; Shen J; Shan J; Patrick CL; Wong WW; Foote RL; Patel SH; Bues M; Liu W
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3497-3506. PubMed ID: 35305269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the influence of double and triple Gaussian proton kernel models on accuracy of dose calculations for spot scanning technique.
Hirayama S; Takayanagi T; Fujii Y; Fujimoto R; Fujitaka S; Umezawa M; Nagamine Y; Hosaka M; Yasui K; Omachi C; Toshito T
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1437-50. PubMed ID: 26936728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A standardized commissioning framework of Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithms for proton pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems.
Chang CW; Huang S; Harms J; Zhou J; Zhang R; Dhabaan A; Slopsema R; Kang M; Liu T; McDonald M; Langen K; Lin L
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1545-1557. PubMed ID: 31945191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single pencil beam benchmark of a module for Monte Carlo simulation of proton transport in the PENELOPE code.
Verbeek N; Wulff J; Bäumer C; Smyczek S; Timmermann B; Brualla L
Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):456-476. PubMed ID: 33217026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric impact of the low-dose envelope of scanned proton beams at a ProBeam facility: comparison of measurements with TPS and MC calculations.
Würl M; Englbrecht F; Parodi K; Hillbrand M
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 61(2):958-73. PubMed ID: 26738626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurements of in-air spot size of pencil proton beam for various air gaps in conjunction with a range shifter on a ProteusPLUS PBS dedicated machine and comparison to the proton dose calculation algorithms.
Rana S; Samuel EJJ
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2019 Sep; 42(3):853-862. PubMed ID: 31222565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation and clinical implementation of an accurate Monte Carlo code for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Huang S; Kang M; Souris K; Ainsley C; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Simone CB; Lin L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):558-572. PubMed ID: 30058170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Validation of a Ray-Casting Analytical Dose Engine for Spot Scanning Proton Delivery Systems.
Younkin JE; Morales DH; Shen J; Shan J; Bues M; Lentz JM; Schild SE; Stoker JB; Ding X; Liu W
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2019; 18():1533033819887182. PubMed ID: 31755362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical validation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo dose engine of a commercial treatment planning system for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Fracchiolla F; Engwall E; Janson M; Tamm F; Lorentini S; Fellin F; Bertolini M; Algranati C; Righetto R; Farace P; Amichetti M; Schwarz M
Phys Med; 2021 Aug; 88():226-234. PubMed ID: 34311160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy.
Shirey RJ; Wu HT
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):164-173. PubMed ID: 29239528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of linear energy transfer computed in a Monte Carlo dose engine of a commercial treatment planning system.
Wagenaar D; Tran LT; Meijers A; Marmitt GG; Souris K; Bolst D; James B; Biasi G; Povoli M; Kok A; Traneus E; van Goethem MJ; Langendijk JA; Rosenfeld AB; Both S
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jan; 65(2):025006. PubMed ID: 31801119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimental characterisation of a proton kernel model for pencil beam scanning techniques.
De Marzi L; Da Fonseca A; Moignier C; Patriarca A; Goudjil F; Mazal A; Buvat I; Hérault J
Phys Med; 2019 Aug; 64():195-203. PubMed ID: 31515020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monte Carlo simulation-based patient-specific QA using machine log files for line-scanning proton radiation therapy.
Jeon C; Lee J; Shin J; Cheon W; Ahn S; Jo K; Han Y
Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):7139-7153. PubMed ID: 37756652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Commissioning and validation of a novel commercial TPS for ocular proton therapy.
Wulff J; Koska B; Heufelder J; Janson M; Bäcker CM; Siregar H; Behrends C; Bäumer C; Foerster A; Bechrakis NE; Timmermann B
Med Phys; 2023 Jan; 50(1):365-379. PubMed ID: 36195575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modelling small block aperture in an in-house developed GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo-based dose engine for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Feng H; Holmes JM; Vora SA; Stoker JB; Bues M; Wong WW; Sio TS; Foote RL; Patel SH; Shen J; Liu W
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Jan; 69(3):. PubMed ID: 37944480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Very high-energy electron dose calculation using the Fermi-Eyges theory of multiple scattering and a simplified pencil beam model.
Ronga MG; Deut U; Bonfrate A; De Marzi L
Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 50(12):8009-8022. PubMed ID: 37730956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of TPS calculation algorithms on dose delivered to the patient in proton therapy treatments.
Molinelli S; Russo S; Magro G; Maestri D; Mairani A; Mastella E; Mirandola A; Vai A; Vischioni B; Valvo F; Ciocca M
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Apr; 64(7):075016. PubMed ID: 30802887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
