These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36579158)

  • 1. Validating the predictive precision of the dialogue support tool on Danish patient cohorts.
    Pedersen CF; Andersen MØ; Carreon LY; Eiskjær S
    N Am Spine Soc J; 2023 Mar; 13():100188. PubMed ID: 36579158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of outcome after spinal surgery-using The Dialogue Support based on the Swedish national quality register.
    Fritzell P; Mesterton J; Hagg O
    Eur Spine J; 2022 Apr; 31(4):889-900. PubMed ID: 34837113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the External Validity of Dialogue Support for Predicting Lumbar Spine Surgery Outcomes in a US Cohort.
    Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Mummaneni P; Bydon M; Chan AK; Asher A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2024 Apr; 49(8):E107-E113. PubMed ID: 37235812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PROPOSE. Development and validation of a prediction model for shared decision making for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Pedersen CF; Andersen MØ; Carreon LY; Skov ST; Doering P; Eiskjær S
    N Am Spine Soc J; 2024 Mar; 17():100309. PubMed ID: 38304320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What level of pain are patients happy to live with after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders?
    Fekete TF; Haschtmann D; Kleinstück FS; Porchet F; Jeszenszky D; Mannion AF
    Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4 Suppl):S12-8. PubMed ID: 26850172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive outcome factors in the young patient treated with lumbar disc herniation surgery.
    Strömqvist F; Strömqvist B; Jönsson B; Gerdhem P; Karlsson MK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Oct; 25(4):448-455. PubMed ID: 27203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction model for outcome after low-back surgery: individualized likelihood of complication, hospital readmission, return to work, and 12-month improvement in functional disability.
    McGirt MJ; Sivaganesan A; Asher AL; Devin CJ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E13. PubMed ID: 26621411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of preoperative diagnosis on patient satisfaction following lumbar spine surgery.
    Crawford CH; Carreon LY; Bydon M; Asher AL; Glassman SD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jun; 26(6):709-715. PubMed ID: 28338454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and temporal validation of a prognostic model for 1-year clinical outcome after decompression surgery for lumbar disc herniation.
    Staub LP; Aghayev E; Skrivankova V; Lord SJ; Haschtmann D; Mannion AF
    Eur Spine J; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1742-1751. PubMed ID: 32107646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making.
    McGirt MJ; Bydon M; Archer KR; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Parker SL; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):357-369. PubMed ID: 28498074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrospective analysis of accuracy and positive predictive value of preoperative lumbar MRI grading after successful outcome following outpatient endoscopic decompression for lumbar foraminal and lateral recess stenosis.
    Lewandrowski KU
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 Apr; 179():74-80. PubMed ID: 30870712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient-reported outcomes following surgery for degenerative spondylolitshtesis: comparison of a universal and multitier health care system.
    Ailon T; Tee J; Manson N; Hall H; Thomas K; Rampersaud YR; Yee A; Dea N; Glennie A; Bailey C; Christie S; Weber MH; Nataraj A; Paquet J; Johnson M; Norton J; Ahn H; McIntosh G; Fisher CG
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 30312774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 2. Predictive model for return to work after elective surgery for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Asher AL; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Parker SL; Bydon M; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):370-381. PubMed ID: 28498069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can Machine-learning Algorithms Predict Early Revision TKA in the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry?
    El-Galaly A; Grazal C; Kappel A; Nielsen PT; Jensen SL; Forsberg JA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Sep; 478(9):2088-2101. PubMed ID: 32667760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The association between the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey and real-world clinical outcomes in lumbar spine surgery.
    Levin JM; Winkelman RD; Smith GA; Tanenbaum J; Benzel EC; Mroz TE; Steinmetz MP
    Spine J; 2017 Nov; 17(11):1586-1593. PubMed ID: 28495242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why are patients dissatisfied after spine surgery when improvements in disability and pain are clinically meaningful?
    Sivaganesan A; Khan I; Pennings JS; Roth SG; Nolan ER; Oleisky ER; Asher AL; Bydon M; Devin CJ; Archer KR
    Spine J; 2020 Oct; 20(10):1535-1543. PubMed ID: 32544721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stability-preserving decompression in degenerative versus congenital spinal stenosis: demographic patterns and patient outcomes.
    Louie PK; Paul JC; Markowitz J; Bell JA; Basques BA; Yacob A; An HS
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1420-1425. PubMed ID: 28456675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of racial disparities on patient-reported satisfaction and short- and long-term perception of health status after elective lumbar spine surgery.
    Elsamadicy AA; Kemeny H; Adogwa O; Sankey EW; Goodwin CR; Yarbrough CK; Lad SP; Karikari IO; Gottfried ON
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jul; 29(1):40-45. PubMed ID: 29701564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-year comprehensive medical management of degenerative lumbar spine disease (lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis, or disc herniation): a value analysis of cost, pain, disability, and quality of life: clinical article.
    Parker SL; Godil SS; Mendenhall SK; Zuckerman SL; Shau DN; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 24785973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.