132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36579981)
1. Can portable Colposcopes Replace Standard-of-care Colposcopes? A Crossover Trial of Two Portable Colposcopes with a Standard-of-Care Video Colposcope.
Natarajan J; Mathur S; Vishnubhatla S; Kumar S; Vashist S; Ramanujam N; Singhal S; Meena J; Tanwar P; Bhatla N
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Dec; 23(12):4013-4021. PubMed ID: 36579981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of stationary colposcope and the Gynocular, by the Swede score systematic colposcopic system in VIA positive women: a crossover randomized trial.
Nessa A; Wistrand C; Begum SA; Thuresson M; Shemer I; Thorsell M; Shemer EA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):339-45. PubMed ID: 24326529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the accuracy in detecting cervical lesions by nurses versus doctors using a stationary colposcope and Gynocular in a low-resource setting.
Nessa A; Roy JS; Chowdhury MA; Khanam Q; Afroz R; Wistrand C; Thuresson M; Thorsell M; Shemer I; Wikström Shemer EA
BMJ Open; 2014 Nov; 4(11):e005313. PubMed ID: 25366674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Portable Pocket colposcopy performs comparably to standard-of-care clinical colposcopy using acetic acid and Lugol's iodine as contrast mediators: an investigational study in Peru.
Mueller JL; Lam CT; Dahl D; Asiedu MN; Krieger MS; Bellido-Fuentes Y; Kellish M; Peters J; Erkanli A; Ortiz EJ; Muasher LC; Taylor PT; Schmitt JW; Venegas G; Ramanujam N
BJOG; 2018 Sep; 125(10):1321-1329. PubMed ID: 29893472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy of hand-held colposcope (Gynocular) in comparison with standard colposcope in patients with abnormal cervical cytology or visual inspection with acetic acid positivity: a cross over randomized controlled study.
Jayabalan S; Subbaiah M; Chaturvedula L
Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2023 Jul; 66(4):300-306. PubMed ID: 37365989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Agreement of colposcope and gynocular in assessment of cervical lesions by swede score: a randomized, crossover pilot trial.
Ngonzi J; Bajunirwe F; Wistrand C; Mayanja R; Altman D; Thorsell M; Wikström Shemer EA
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2013 Oct; 17(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 23645068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic colposcopic accuracy by the gynocular and a stationary colposcope.
Kallner HK; Persson M; Thuresson M; Altman D; Shemer I; Thorsell M; Shemer EA
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 26063001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Agreement between colposcopic impression and histological diagnosis among human papillomavirus type 16-positive women: a clinical trial using dynamic spectral imaging colposcopy.
Zaal A; Louwers JA; Berkhof J; Kocken M; Ter Harmsel WA; Graziosi GC; Spruijt JW; Balas C; Papagiannakis E; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ; van Kemenade FJ; Verheijen RH
BJOG; 2012 Apr; 119(5):537-44. PubMed ID: 22304443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a compact, rechargeable, magnifying device to triage VIA and HPV positive women in a cervical cancer screening program in rural India.
Basu P; Banerjee D; Mittal S; Mandal R; Ghosh I; Das P; Muwonge R; Biswas J
Cancer Causes Control; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1253-9. PubMed ID: 27581249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of a low cost magnifying device, Magnivisualizer, versus colposcope for detection of pre-cancer and cancerous lesions of uterine cervix.
Singh V; Parashari A; Gupta S; Sodhani P; Sehgal A
J Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Oct; 25(4):282-6. PubMed ID: 25142620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. International Image Concordance Study to Compare a Point-of-Care Tampon Colposcope With a Standard-of-Care Colposcope.
Mueller JL; Asma E; Lam CT; Krieger MS; Gallagher JE; Erkanli A; Hariprasad R; Malliga JS; Muasher LC; Mchome B; Oneko O; Taylor P; Venegas G; Wanyoro A; Mehrotra R; Schmitt JW; Ramanujam N
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2017 Apr; 21(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 28263237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Design of a Novel Low Cost Point of Care Tampon (POCkeT) Colposcope for Use in Resource Limited Settings.
Lam CT; Krieger MS; Gallagher JE; Asma B; Muasher LC; Schmitt JW; Ramanujam N
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0135869. PubMed ID: 26332673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of portable colposcopy and human papillomavirus testing for screening of cervical cancer in rural China.
Newman H; Hu J; Li X; He J; Bradford L; Shan S; Wu X; Zhu B; Yang W; Fu B; Zhu B; Gao G
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jan; 29(1):23-27. PubMed ID: 30640679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the AV Magnivisualizer device with colposcopy to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using the Swede scoring system.
Dayal U; Gupta B; Hariprasad R; Shriya R; Rajaram S; Prasad B; Mehrotra R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Nov; 147(2):219-224. PubMed ID: 31353466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Colposcopy telemedicine: live versus static swede score and accuracy in detecting CIN2+, a cross-sectional pilot study.
Taghavi K; Banerjee D; Mandal R; Kallner HK; Thorsell M; Friis T; Kocoska-Maras L; Strander B; Singer A; Wikström E
BMC Womens Health; 2018 Jun; 18(1):89. PubMed ID: 29890991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An integrated strategy for improving contrast, durability, and portability of a Pocket Colposcope for cervical cancer screening and diagnosis.
Lam CT; Mueller J; Asma B; Asiedu M; Krieger MS; Chitalia R; Dahl D; Taylor P; Schmitt JW; Ramanujam N
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192530. PubMed ID: 29425225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical determinants of a positive visual inspection after treatment with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening.
Castle PE; Qiao YL; Zhao FH; Chen W; Valdez M; Zhang X; Kang LN; Bansil P; Paul P; Bai P; Peck R; Li J; Chen F; Jeronimo J
BJOG; 2014 May; 121(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 24575872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation of Swede score colposcopy scoring system and histopathological results in patients with high-risk HPV infection other than HPV16 and 18.
Alan M; Gunyeli I; Gultekin M; Sancı M; Yuce K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jan; 30(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 31792083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA) for triage of HPV screen-positive women: results from the ESTAMPA study.
Baena A; Mesher D; Salgado Y; Martínez S; Villalba GR; Amarilla ML; Salgado B; Flores B; Bellido-Fuentes Y; Álvarez-Larraondo M; Valls J; Lora O; Virreira-Prout G; Figueroa J; Turcios E; Soilán AM; Ortega M; Celis M; González M; Venegas G; Terán C; Ferrera A; Mendoza L; Kasamatsu E; Murillo R; Wiesner C; Broutet N; Luciani S; Herrero R; Almonte M;
Int J Cancer; 2023 Apr; 152(8):1581-1592. PubMed ID: 36451311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
