These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36580598)

  • 21. Getting food policy on the Mayoral table: a comparison of two election cycles in New York and London.
    Freudenberg N; Atkinson S
    Public Health; 2015 Apr; 129(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 25834929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. More religious, less dogmatic: Toward a general framework for gender differences in religion.
    Schnabel L
    Soc Sci Res; 2018 Sep; 75():58-72. PubMed ID: 30080492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms.
    Clayton K; Davis NT; Nyhan B; Porter E; Ryan TJ; Wood TJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jun; 118(23):. PubMed ID: 34078668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The surprising politics of anti-immigrant prejudice: How political conservatism moderates the effect of immigrant race and religion on infrahumanization judgements.
    Banton O; West K; Kinney E
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2020 Jan; 59(1):157-170. PubMed ID: 31364179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Misinformation about COVID-19: evidence for differential latent profiles and a strong association with trust in science.
    Agley J; Xiao Y
    BMC Public Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):89. PubMed ID: 33413219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Election promises on children's wellbeing and health 2015 to 2021 - a study of Finnish voting advice applications database.
    Hiilamo A; Ristikari T; Helve O; Kaila M; Jalonen H; Virtanen P
    Scand J Public Health; 2022 Dec; 50(8):1105-1112. PubMed ID: 35904314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Election polling errors across time and space.
    Jennings W; Wlezien C
    Nat Hum Behav; 2018 Apr; 2(4):276-283. PubMed ID: 30936537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Do elections make you sick? Evidence from first-time voters.
    Chang HH; Meyerhoefer CD
    Health Econ; 2023 May; 32(5):1064-1083. PubMed ID: 36694096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Who Is Happier in China? Exploring Determinant Factors Using Religion as a Moderator.
    Sun Y; Zhang Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Nov; 16(22):. PubMed ID: 31698705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparing the effect of cross-group friendship on generalized trust to its effect on prejudice: The mediating role of threat perceptions and negative affect.
    Achbari W; Geys B; Doosje B
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0245983. PubMed ID: 33544735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Statistical detection of systematic election irregularities.
    Klimek P; Yegorov Y; Hanel R; Thurner S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Oct; 109(41):16469-73. PubMed ID: 23010929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The covariation of religion and politics during the transition to young adulthood: challenging global identity assumptions.
    De Haan LG; Schulenberg J
    J Adolesc; 1997 Oct; 20(5):537-52. PubMed ID: 9368131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The impact of politics, religion, and rurality on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Oregon: a cross-sectional study.
    Morrison T
    Rural Remote Health; 2022 Aug; 22(3):7140. PubMed ID: 35909220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Power through 'us': leaders' use of we-referencing language predicts election victory.
    Steffens NK; Haslam SA
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e77952. PubMed ID: 24194904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The political polarization of physicians in the United States: an analysis of campaign contributions to federal elections, 1991 through 2012.
    Bonica A; Rosenthal H; Rothman DJ
    JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Aug; 174(8):1308-17. PubMed ID: 24887456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Data from the GIPEyOP online election poll for the 2015 Spanish General election.
    Pavía JM; Coll-Serrano V; Cuñat-Giménez R; Carrasco-Arroyo S
    Data Brief; 2020 Aug; 31():105719. PubMed ID: 32490084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. When election expectations fail: Polarized perceptions of election legitimacy increase with accumulating evidence of election outcomes and with polarized media.
    Grant MD; Flores A; Pedersen EJ; Sherman DK; Van Boven L
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0259473. PubMed ID: 34851979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The timing of drug funding announcements relative to elections: a case study involving dementia medications.
    Gill SS; Gupta N; Bell CM; Rochon PA; Austin PC; Laupacis A
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e56921. PubMed ID: 23460820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. #Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election.
    Chen E; Deb A; Ferrara E
    J Comput Soc Sci; 2022; 5(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 33824934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does holding elections during a Covid-19 pandemic put the lives of politicians at risk?
    Bach L; Guillouzouic A; Malgouyres C
    J Health Econ; 2021 Jul; 78():102462. PubMed ID: 33915491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.