These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36580764)

  • 21. Investigating the role of beliefs in influencing the hand-held and hands-free mobile phone use among pedestrians in India.
    Yadav AK; Choudhary SS; Pawar NM; Velaga NR
    Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot; 2023 Mar; 30(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 35972894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mobile phone involvement, beliefs, and texting while driving in Ukraine.
    Hill T; Sullman MJM; Stephens AN
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Apr; 125():124-131. PubMed ID: 30743175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Examining driver distraction in the context of driving speed: An observational study using disruptive technology and naturalistic data.
    Iio K; Guo X; Lord D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Apr; 153():105983. PubMed ID: 33618100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Smartwatches are more distracting than mobile phones while driving: Results from an experimental study.
    Brodeur M; Ruer P; Léger PM; Sénécal S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105846. PubMed ID: 33181456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Self-reported handheld device use while driving.
    Kim K; Ghimire J; Pant P; Yamashita E
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Apr; 125():106-115. PubMed ID: 30738294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Taking the right course: The possibilities and challenges of offering alternatives to prosecution for drivers detected using mobile phones while driving.
    Savigar-Shaw L; Wells H; Briggs G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Aug; 173():106710. PubMed ID: 35588589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What drives technology-based distractions? A structural equation model on social-psychological factors of technology-based driver distraction engagement.
    Chen HY; Donmez B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jun; 91():166-74. PubMed ID: 26994371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. "It is frustrating to not have control even though I know it's not legal!": A mixed-methods investigation on applications to prevent mobile phone use while driving.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Truelove V; King M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Mar; 137():105412. PubMed ID: 32006729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating the impact of penalising the use of mobile phones while driving on road traffic fatalities, serious injuries and mobile phone use: a systematic review.
    Olsson B; Pütz H; Reitzug F; Humphreys DK
    Inj Prev; 2020 Aug; 26(4):378-385. PubMed ID: 32229534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sociotechnical Factors Supporting Mobile Phone Use by Bus Drivers.
    Phillips RO; Berge SH
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2023; 11(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 36657015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Targeting young driver emotions can reduce their cellphone distractions.
    Hoseinzadeh Nooshabadi M; Vasquez HM; Donmez B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Nov; 192():107202. PubMed ID: 37531853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mobile phone use while driving: Development and validation of knowledge, attitude, and practice survey instruments.
    Adeyemi OJ
    J Safety Res; 2021 Jun; 77():30-39. PubMed ID: 34092322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of Mobile Phone Use on Driving Performance: An Experimental Study of Workload and Traffic Violations.
    Ortega CAC; Mariscal MA; Boulagouas W; Herrera S; Espinosa JM; García-Herrero S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(13):. PubMed ID: 34281034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mobile phone penalties and road crashes: Are changes in sanctions effective?
    Fry JM
    J Safety Res; 2023 Feb; 84():384-392. PubMed ID: 36868667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Association between mobile phone traffic volume and road crash fatalities: A population-based case-crossover study.
    Gariazzo C; Stafoggia M; Bruzzone S; Pelliccioni A; Forastiere F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():25-33. PubMed ID: 29544134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Driver distraction by smartphone use (WhatsApp) in different age groups.
    Ortiz C; Ortiz-Peregrina S; Castro JJ; Casares-López M; Salas C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():239-249. PubMed ID: 29723735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The mere presence of a mobile phone: Does it influence driving performance?
    Chee P; Irwin J; Bennett JM; Carrigan AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106226. PubMed ID: 34198051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. "It's okay because I'm just driving": an exploration of self-reported mobile phone use among Mexican drivers.
    Useche SA; Alonso F; Faus M; Cervantes Trejo A; Castaneda I; Oviedo-Trespalacios O
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e16899. PubMed ID: 38410804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Self-regulation of driving speed among distracted drivers: An application of driver behavioral adaptation theory.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Washington S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Aug; 18(6):599-605. PubMed ID: 28095026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Safety analysis of pedestrians distracted by mobile phones at street crossings: Field study in Nanjing.
    Wang C; Hou M; Easa SM; Cheng J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jun; 200():107563. PubMed ID: 38555805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.