These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36581595)
1. Introduction and Clinical Validation of an Updated Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure bIOP (v2). Eliasy A; Lopes BT; Wang J; Abass A; Vinciguerra R; Vinciguerra P; Bao FJ; Elsheikh A Curr Eye Res; 2023 Apr; 48(4):382-391. PubMed ID: 36581595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK. Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ex-vivo experimental validation of biomechanically-corrected intraocular pressure measurements on human eyes using the CorVis ST. Eliasy A; Chen KJ; Vinciguerra R; Maklad O; Vinciguerra P; Ambrósio R; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A Exp Eye Res; 2018 Oct; 175():98-102. PubMed ID: 29908883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure using Corvis ST and comparison of the Corvis ST, noncontact tonometer, and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma. Nakao Y; Kiuchi Y; Okumichi H PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238395. PubMed ID: 32966284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative analysis of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure with corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology versus conventional noncontact intraocular pressure. Ma J; Wang Y; Hao W; Jhanji V Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 40(1):117-124. PubMed ID: 31432352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of a new correction algorithm for dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer tonometry before and after laser in situ keratomileusis and small-incision lenticule extraction. Chen KJ; Joda A; Vinciguerra R; Eliasy A; Sefat SMM; Kook D; Geraghty B; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 May; 44(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 29685776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by Corvis ST and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension. Ye Y; Yang Y; Fan Y; Lan M; Yu K; Yu M J Glaucoma; 2019 Oct; 28(10):922-928. PubMed ID: 31453898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Agreement of ocular response analyzer cornea compensated IOP with corvis ST biomechanical IOP following Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK. Salouti R; Razeghinejad R; Eslami G; Zare M; Salouti K; Ghoreyshi M; Nowroozzadeh MH Eye (Lond); 2023 Feb; 37(2):263-266. PubMed ID: 35013609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and validation of an intuitive biomechanics-based method for intraocular pressure measurement: a modal analysis approach. Hsu FL; Shih PJ; Wang IJ BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Mar; 23(1):124. PubMed ID: 36973657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in corneal biomechanics during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). Cao K; Liu L; Yu T; Chen F; Bai J; Liu T Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Apr; 35(3):599-609. PubMed ID: 31463819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of 4 tonometers in measuring IOP after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK, SMILE, and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy. Chen S; Lopes BT; Huang W; Zheng X; Wang J; Zhu R; Vinciguerra R; Li Y; Wang Q; Li H; Bao F; Elsheikh A J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Jul; 46(7):967-974. PubMed ID: 32271270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Three Tonometers in Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Eyes That Underwent Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy. Ang RET; Bargas NVR; Martinez GHA; Sosuan GMN; Nabor-Umali MI Clin Ophthalmol; 2022; 16():1623-1637. PubMed ID: 35656390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Corneal biomechanics and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension and controls. Vinciguerra R; Rehman S; Vallabh NA; Batterbury M; Czanner G; Choudhary A; Cheeseman R; Elsheikh A; Willoughby CE Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 104(1):121-126. PubMed ID: 30923134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis. Matsuura M; Murata H; Fujino Y; Yanagisawa M; Nakao Y; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 104(4):563-568. PubMed ID: 31362932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Keratoconus and Forme Fruste Keratoconus. Nishida T; Kojima T; Kataoka T; Isogai N; Yoshida Y; Nakamura T Ophthalmic Res; 2020; 63(6):541-549. PubMed ID: 32106114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements between Easyton transpalpebral tonometry and Perkins, iCare iC100 and Corvis ST, and the influence of corneal and anterior scleral thickness. Salazar-Quiñones L; Fernández-Vigo JI; Pérez-Quiñones Y; Montolío-Marzo E; García-Bella J; Morales-Fernandez L; Sánchez-Del-Hoyo R; García-Feijóo J; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 43(11):4121-4129. PubMed ID: 37632576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraocular pressure changes and corneal biomechanics after hyperopic small-incision lenticule extraction. Fu D; Li M; Knorz MC; Wei S; Shang J; Zhou X BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 20(1):129. PubMed ID: 32248796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in Intraocular Pressure after Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy and Femtosecond Laser In Situ Keratomileusis. Chou CC; Shih PJ; Lin HC; Chen JP; Yen JY; Wang IJ J Ophthalmol; 2021; 2021():5592195. PubMed ID: 33777445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Alterations in intraocular pressure and the CorVis parameters after LASIK]. Anton A; Neuburger M; Jordan JF; Wecker T; Lübke J; Heinzelmann S; Lapp T; Böhringer D; Reinhard T; Maier P Ophthalmologe; 2017 May; 114(5):445-449. PubMed ID: 27620918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanically-Corrected Intraocular Pressure Compared To Pressure Measured With Commonly Used Tonometers In Normal Subjects. Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Yekta A; Elsheikh A; Khabazkhoob M; Ambrósio R; Maddah N; Danesh Z Clin Optom (Auckl); 2019; 11():127-133. PubMed ID: 31802962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]