These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3658281)
1. A critical evaluation of the endocervical curettage. Spirtos NM; Schlaerth JB; d'Ablaing G; Morrow CP Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):729-33. PubMed ID: 3658281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of endocervical curettage in satisfactory colposcopy. el-Dabh A; Rogers RE; Davis TE; Sutton GP Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Aug; 74(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 2748050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of endocervical curettage in colposcopy. Hatch KD; Shingleton HM; Orr JW; Gore H; Soong SJ Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Mar; 65(3):403-8. PubMed ID: 3974966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Positive endocervical curettage in patients with satisfactory and unsatisfactory colposcopy: clinical implications. Krebs HB; Wheelock JB; Hurt WG Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Apr; 69(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 3822303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endocervical curettage in the evaluation of cervical disease in patients with adequate colposcopy. Soisson AP; Molina CY; Benson WL Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jan; 71(1):109-11. PubMed ID: 3336531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The value of endocervical curettage as part of the standard colposcopic evaluation. Granai CO; Jelen I; Louis F; Kawada CY; Curry SL J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):373-5. PubMed ID: 4009557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. RO-TAGE biopsy. An improved method of endocervical evaluation. Mann WJ; Chumas J; Rochelson B; Funt M; Westermann C J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):376-8. PubMed ID: 4009558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The utility of endocervical curettage: does routine ECC at the time of colposcopy for low-grade cytologic abnormalities improve diagnosis of high-grade disease? Rose JD; Byun SY; Sims SM; Davis JD Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):530.e1-3. PubMed ID: 22541611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microcolposcopy vs. cone histology in evaluation of the endocervix in women with inadequate colposcopy or positive endocervical curettage. Hunter V; Tseng P J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):625-8. PubMed ID: 2810245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endocervical curettage, cone margins, and residual adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix. Denehy TR; Gregori CA; Breen JL Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 90(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9207802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endometrial and endocervical curettage findings at the time of cervical conization. Presley JJ; Hernandez E; Mudafort E; Miyazawa K J Reprod Med; 1987 Feb; 32(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 3560085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endocervical curettage as a routine part of colposcopic examinations for abnormal cervical cytology. Saltzman DH; Evans MI; Warsof SL; Friedman AJ J Reprod Med; 1985 Nov; 30(11):871-3. PubMed ID: 4078822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage? Weitzman GA; Korhonen MO; Reeves KO; Irwin JF; Carter TS; Kaufman RH J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of the diagnosis in suspected intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix. Myllynen L; Karjalainen O Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1984; 73(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 6732157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]