216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36583305)
1. A hybrid method to improve efficiency of patient specific SRS and SBRT QA using 3D secondary dose verification.
Baltz GC; Manigold R; Seier R; Kirsner SM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 24(3):e13858. PubMed ID: 36583305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multi-institution validation of a new high spatial resolution diode array for SRS and SBRT plan pretreatment quality assurance.
Rose MS; Tirpak L; Van Casteren K; Zack J; Simon T; Schoenfeld A; Simon W
Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):3153-3164. PubMed ID: 32215929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Machine learning-generated decision boundaries for prediction and exploration of patient-specific quality assurance failures in stereotactic radiosurgery plans.
Braun J; Quirk S; Tchistiakova E
Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1955-1963. PubMed ID: 35064564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment planning of VMAT and step-and-shoot IMRT delivery techniques for single fraction spine SBRT: An intercomparative dosimetric analysis and phantom-based quality assurance measurements.
Ouyang Z; LaHurd DV; Balagamwala EH; Chao ST; Suh JH; Xia P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 31821729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is it still necessary to perform measured based pre-treatment patient-specific QA for SRS HyperArc treatments?
Cavalli N; Bonanno E; Borzì GR; D'Anna A; Pace M; Stella G; Zirone L; Marino C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 25(2):e14156. PubMed ID: 37803884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A patient-specific QA comparison between 2D and 3D diode arrays for single-lesion SRS and SBRT treatments.
Lee YC; Kim Y
J Radiosurg SBRT; 2021; 7(4):295-307. PubMed ID: 34631231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative evaluation of 3D dosimetry for stereotactic volumetric-modulated arc delivery using COMPASS.
Vikraman S; Manigandan D; Karrthick KP; Sambasivaselli R; Senniandavar V; Ramu M; Rajesh T; Lutz M; Muthukumaran M; Karthikeyan N; Tejinder K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 16(1):5128. PubMed ID: 25679152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric Systems in Pre-Treatment QA for Stereotactic Treatments: Correlation Agreements and Target Volume Dependency.
Muthu S; Mudhana G
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2024 Apr; 25(4):1425-1432. PubMed ID: 38680004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of commercial devices for patient specific QA of stereotactic radiotherapy plans.
James S; Al-Basheer A; Elder E; Huh C; Ackerman C; Barrett J; Hamilton R; Mostafaei F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Aug; 24(8):e14009. PubMed ID: 37158727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Commissioning and clinical evaluation of a novel high-resolution quality assurance digital detector array for SRS and SBRT.
Zhou Y; Liu Y; Chen M; Fang J; Xiao L; Huang S; Qi Z; Deng X; Zhang J; Peng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 25(4):e14258. PubMed ID: 38175960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. EPID-based 3D dosimetry for pre-treatment FFF VMAT stereotactic body radiotherapy plan verification using dosimetry Check
Chendi A; Botti A; Orlandi M; Sghedoni R; Iori M; Cagni E
Phys Med; 2021 Jan; 81():227-236. PubMed ID: 33485140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Dosimetric Performance among Commercial Quality Assurance Systems for Verifying Pretreatment Plans of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Flattening-Filter-Free Beams.
Chung JB; Kang SW; Eom KY; Song C; Choi KS; Suh TS
J Korean Med Sci; 2016 Nov; 31(11):1742-1748. PubMed ID: 27709851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel approach to SBRT patient quality assurance using EPID-based real-time transit dosimetry : A step to QA with in vivo EPID dosimetry.
Moustakis C; Ebrahimi Tazehmahalleh F; Elsayad K; Fezeu F; Scobioala S
Strahlenther Onkol; 2020 Feb; 196(2):182-192. PubMed ID: 31925465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do we need patient-specific QA for adaptively generated plans? Retrospective evaluation of delivered online adaptive treatment plans on Varian Ethos.
Zhao X; Stanley DN; Cardenas CE; Harms J; Popple RA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 24(2):e13876. PubMed ID: 36560887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A structured FMEA approach to optimizing combinations of plan-specific quality assurance techniques for IMRT and VMAT QA.
O'Daniel JC; Giles W; Cui Y; Adamson J
Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5387-5397. PubMed ID: 37475493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel approach to EPID-based 3D volumetric dosimetry for IMRT and VMAT QA.
Alhazmi A; Gianoli C; Neppl S; Martins J; Veloza S; Podesta M; Verhaegen F; Reiner M; Belka C; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2018 May; 63(11):115002. PubMed ID: 29714714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Refinement of MLC modeling improves commercial QA dosimetry system for SRS and SBRT patient-specific QA.
Hillman Y; Kim J; Chetty I; Wen N
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1351-1359. PubMed ID: 29431865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient specific quality assurance in SBRT: a systematic review of measurement-based methods.
Malatesta T; Scaggion A; Giglioli FR; Belmonte G; Casale M; Colleoni P; Falco MD; Giuliano A; Linsalata S; Marino C; Moretti E; Richetto V; Sardo A; Russo S; Mancosu P
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Oct; 68(21):. PubMed ID: 37625437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
