147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36583490)
41. Factors associated with hospital readmission following diverting ileostomy creation.
Li W; Stocchi L; Cherla D; Liu G; Agostinelli A; Delaney CP; Steele SR; Gorgun E
Tech Coloproctol; 2017 Aug; 21(8):641-648. PubMed ID: 28819783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Ghost ileostomy after anterior resection for rectal cancer: a preliminary experience.
Gullà N; Trastulli S; Boselli C; Cirocchi R; Cavaliere D; Verdecchia GM; Morelli U; Gentile D; Eugeni E; Caracappa D; Listorti C; Sciannameo F; Noya G
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2011 Oct; 396(7):997-1007. PubMed ID: 21479620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. One-stitch versus traditional method of protective loop ileostomy in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection: A retrospective comparative study.
Chen Y; Pei W; Wang Q; Wang W; Xu T; Jing C; Li L; Zhang J
Int J Surg; 2020 Aug; 80():117-123. PubMed ID: 32650118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Defunctioning loop ileostomy in anterior resection for rectal cancer and subsequent renal failure: nationwide population-based study.
Rutegård M; Häggström J; Back E; Holmgren K; Wixner J; Rutegård J; Matthiessen P; Sjöström O
BJS Open; 2023 May; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 37161674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Variations of the renal function parameters in rectal cancer patients with a defunctioning loop ileostomy.
Scripcariu DV; Siriopol D; Moscalu M; Scripcariu V
Int Urol Nephrol; 2018 Aug; 50(8):1489-1495. PubMed ID: 29974404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Protective ileostomy does not prevent anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal cancer.
Niu L; Wang J; Zhang P; Zhao X
J Int Med Res; 2020 Aug; 48(8):300060520946520. PubMed ID: 32862745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Body mass index as a predictor of postoperative complications in loop ileostomy closure after rectal resection in Japanese patients.
Saito Y; Takakura Y; Hinoi T; Egi H; Tashiro H; Ohdan H
Hiroshima J Med Sci; 2014 Dec; 63(4):33-8. PubMed ID: 25707091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Role of diversion ileostomy in low rectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Thoker M; Wani I; Parray FQ; Khan N; Mir SA; Thoker P
Int J Surg; 2014; 12(9):945-51. PubMed ID: 25038542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Prognostic factors for complications after loop ileostomy reversal.
Climent M; Frago R; Cornellà N; Serrano M; Kreisler E; Biondo S
Tech Coloproctol; 2022 Jan; 26(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 34751847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Overall readmissions and readmissions related to dehydration after creation of an ileostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vogel I; Shinkwin M; van der Storm SL; Torkington J; A Cornish J; Tanis PJ; Hompes R; Bemelman WA
Tech Coloproctol; 2022 May; 26(5):333-349. PubMed ID: 35192122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Septic complications after low anterior rectal resection--is diverting stoma still justified?
Leester B; Asztalos I; Polnyib C
Acta Chir Iugosl; 2002; 49(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 12587473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Laparoscopic diverting ileostomy in rectal cancer surgery].
Ihnát P; Vávra P; Guňková P; Zatloukal A; Czudek S; Zonča P
Rozhl Chir; 2017; 96(3):120-124. PubMed ID: 28433044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Two-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through coloanal anastomosis versus coloanal anastomosis with protective loop ileostomy for low rectal cancer. Protocol for a randomized controlled trial (Turnbull-BCN).
Biondo S; Trenti L; Galvez A; Espin-Basany E; Bianco F; Romano G; Kreisler E;
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Sep; 32(9):1357-1362. PubMed ID: 28667499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The value of diverting loop ileostomy on the high-risk colon and rectal anastomosis.
Bax TW; McNevin MS
Am J Surg; 2007 May; 193(5):585-7; discussion 587-8. PubMed ID: 17434360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of the clinical outcomes of skin bridge loop ileostomy and traditional loop ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer.
Ye H; Huang S; Yu J; Zhou Q; Xi C; Cao L; Wang P; Shen J; Gong Z
Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):9101. PubMed ID: 33907300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Defunctioning loop ileostomy for pelvic anastomoses: predictors of morbidity and nonclosure.
Chun LJ; Haigh PI; Tam MS; Abbas MA
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Feb; 55(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 22228160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Elevated risk of stoma outlet obstruction following colorectal surgery in patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a retrospective cohort study.
Okada S; Hata K; Emoto S; Murono K; Kaneko M; Sasaki K; Otani K; Nishikawa T; Tanaka T; Kawai K; Nozawa H
Surg Today; 2018 Dec; 48(12):1060-1067. PubMed ID: 30046881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Diverting ileostomy versus no diversion after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.
Mrak K; Uranitsch S; Pedross F; Heuberger A; Klingler A; Jagoditsch M; Weihs D; Eberl T; Tschmelitsch J
Surgery; 2016 Apr; 159(4):1129-39. PubMed ID: 26706610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effectiveness between early and late temporary ileostomy closure in patients with rectal cancer: A prospective study.
Zhen L; Wang Y; Zhang Z; Wu T; Liu R; Li T; Zhao L; Deng H; Qi X; Li G
Curr Probl Cancer; 2017; 41(3):231-240. PubMed ID: 28434582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Comparison of protective colostomy vs. ileostomy in rectal cancer surgery].
Segura-González JMC; Tiscareño-Lozano II; García-Galicia A; Hernández-Muñoz SI; Vera-Sánchez MG; Maza-Cruz AN; Montiel-Jarquín ÁJ; Jiménez-Luna I
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2023 Mar; 61(2):133-139. PubMed ID: 37200516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
