119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36583854)
1. Linear Correlation between True Density and Crystallinity of Regenerated and Mercerized Celluloses.
Daicho K; Fujisawa S; Saito T
Biomacromolecules; 2023 Feb; 24(2):661-666. PubMed ID: 36583854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cellulose Structural Polymorphism in Plant Primary Cell Walls Investigated by High-Field 2D Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy and Density Functional Theory Calculations.
Wang T; Yang H; Kubicki JD; Hong M
Biomacromolecules; 2016 Jun; 17(6):2210-22. PubMed ID: 27192562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Crystallinity-Independent yet Modification-Dependent True Density of Nanocellulose.
Daicho K; Kobayashi K; Fujisawa S; Saito T
Biomacromolecules; 2020 Feb; 21(2):939-945. PubMed ID: 31820948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the orientation of the chains in the mercerized cellulose.
Zlenko DV; Vtyurina DN; Usachev SV; Skoblin AA; Mikhaleva MG; Politenkova GG; Nikolsky SN; Stovbun SV
Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):8765. PubMed ID: 33888779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Segal crystallinity index revisited by the simulation of X-ray diffraction patterns of cotton cellulose Iβ and cellulose II.
Nam S; French AD; Condon BD; Concha M
Carbohydr Polym; 2016 Jan; 135():1-9. PubMed ID: 26453844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Self-assembled nanostructured cellulose prepared by a dissolution and regeneration process using phosphoric acid as a solvent.
Hao X; Shen W; Chen Z; Zhu J; Feng L; Wu Z; Wang P; Zeng X; Wu T
Carbohydr Polym; 2015 Jun; 123():297-304. PubMed ID: 25843862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preparation of Reswellable Amorphous Porous Celluloses through Hydrogelation from Ionic Liquid Solutions.
Idenoue S; Oga Y; Hashimoto D; Yamamoto K; Kadokawa JI
Materials (Basel); 2019 Oct; 12(19):. PubMed ID: 31590311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cryogenic grinding of cotton fiber cellulose: The effect on physicochemical properties.
Shamshina JL; Acharya S; Rumi SS; Liyanage S; Parajuli P; Abidi N
Carbohydr Polym; 2022 Aug; 289():119408. PubMed ID: 35483831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Crystallite width determines monolayer hydration across a wide spectrum of celluloses isolated from plants.
Driemeier C; Bragatto J
J Phys Chem B; 2013 Jan; 117(1):415-21. PubMed ID: 23256770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of the supramolecular structure and physicochemical properties of cellulose on its dissolution in a lithium chloride/N,N-dimethylacetamide solvent system.
Ramos LA; Assaf JM; El Seoud OA; Frollini E
Biomacromolecules; 2005; 6(5):2638-47. PubMed ID: 16153102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extraction and characterization of celluloses from various plant byproducts.
Gabriel T; Belete A; Syrowatka F; Neubert RHH; Gebre-Mariam T
Int J Biol Macromol; 2020 May; ():. PubMed ID: 32437811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of Cellulose regenerated from solutions of pine and eucalyptus woods in 1-allyl-3-methilimidazolium chloride.
Casas A; Alonso MV; Oliet M; Santos TM; Rodriguez F
Carbohydr Polym; 2013 Feb; 92(2):1946-52. PubMed ID: 23399242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of mercerization process based on the intensity change of deconvoluted resonances of (13)C CP/MAS NMR: Cellulose mercerized under cooling and non-cooling conditions.
Miura K; Nakano T
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2015 Aug; 53():189-95. PubMed ID: 26042706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Controlled mercerization of bacterial cellulose provides tunability of modulus and ductility over two orders of magnitude.
Younesi M; Wu X; Akkus O
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Feb; 90():530-537. PubMed ID: 30469131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. (13)C NMR assignments of regenerated cellulose from solid-state 2D NMR spectroscopy.
Idström A; Schantz S; Sundberg J; Chmelka BF; Gatenholm P; Nordstierna L
Carbohydr Polym; 2016 Oct; 151():480-487. PubMed ID: 27474592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the polymorphic and morphological changes of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC-I) upon mercerization and conversion to CNC-II.
Jin E; Guo J; Yang F; Zhu Y; Song J; Jin Y; Rojas OJ
Carbohydr Polym; 2016 Jun; 143():327-35. PubMed ID: 27083376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensing the structural differences in cellulose from apple and bacterial cell wall materials by Raman and FT-IR spectroscopy.
Szymańska-Chargot M; Cybulska J; Zdunek A
Sensors (Basel); 2011; 11(6):5543-60. PubMed ID: 22163913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. X-ray structure of mercerized cellulose II at 1 a resolution.
Langan P; Nishiyama Y; Chanzy H
Biomacromolecules; 2001; 2(2):410-6. PubMed ID: 11749200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of cellulose fine structure on kinetics of its digestion by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro.
Weimer PJ; Lopez-Guisa JM; French AD
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1990 Aug; 56(8):2421-9. PubMed ID: 2403252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of anti-solvents on the characteristics of regenerated cellulose from 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ionic liquid.
Tan X; Chen L; Li X; Xie F
Int J Biol Macromol; 2019 Mar; 124():314-320. PubMed ID: 30448486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
