These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36583866)

  • 1. Outcomes of super minimally invasive surgery vs. esophagectomy for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-center study based on propensity score matching.
    Feng J; Chai N; Linghu E; Feng X; Li L; Du C; Zhang W; Wu Q
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2022 Oct; 135(20):2491-2493. PubMed ID: 36583866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.
    Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
    Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and left transthoracic esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Wang Q; Wu Z; Zhan T; Fang S; Zhang S; Shen G; Wu M
    BMC Cancer; 2019 May; 19(1):500. PubMed ID: 31132995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term outcomes following minimally invasive and open esophagectomy in Finland: A population-based study.
    Sihvo E; Helminen O; Gunn J; Sipilä JOT; Rautava P; Kytö V
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 45(6):1099-1104. PubMed ID: 30553631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-weighted analysis.
    Yun JK; Chong BK; Kim HJ; Lee IS; Gong CS; Kim BS; Lee GD; Choi S; Kim HR; Kim DK; Park SI; Kim YH
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 May; 33(5):. PubMed ID: 31665266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive esophagectomy for elderly esophageal cancer patients.
    Sugita Y; Nakamura T; Sawada R; Takiguchi G; Urakawa N; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Matsuda Y; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2021 Mar; 34(3):. PubMed ID: 32895704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short- and mid-term outcomes of robotic versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for squamous cell esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
    Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Hua R; Yang Y; He Y; Ye B; Guo X; Sun Y; Li Z
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Jun; 33(6):. PubMed ID: 31608939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
    Yamashita K; Watanabe M; Mine S; Toihata T; Fukudome I; Okamura A; Yuda M; Hayami M; Ishizuka N; Imamura Y
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4443-4450. PubMed ID: 29644466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity-score matched analysis.
    Na KJ; Kang CH; Park S; Park IK; Kim YT
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):841-848. PubMed ID: 34542834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Thoracolaparoscopic vs Open McKeown's Esophagectomy.
    Wang K; Zhong J; Liu Q; Lin P; Fu J
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Feb; 113(2):473-481. PubMed ID: 33621558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Impact of Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Neck-Abdominal First Approach on the Short- and Long-Term Outcomes for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
    Hoshino A; Nakajima Y; Kawada K; Tokairin Y; Okada T; Matsui T; Yamaguchi K; Kawano T; Kinugasa Y
    World J Surg; 2020 Nov; 44(11):3829-3836. PubMed ID: 32591842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
    Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of body mass index on perioperative and oncological outcomes in elderly patients undergoing minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Tong C; Lu H; Zhu H; Wu J
    Cancer Med; 2022 Aug; 11(15):2913-2922. PubMed ID: 35312237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robot-Assisted Versus Thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: a Propensity Score-Matched Study.
    Trung LV; Loc NVV; Tien TPD; Ai BD; Lam TLQ; Vuong NL
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2022 May; 26(5):1093-1096. PubMed ID: 34786664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recent advances in minimally invasive esophagectomy for squamous esophageal cancer.
    Yip HC; Shirakawa Y; Cheng CY; Huang CL; Chiu PWY
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2020 Dec; 1482(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 32783237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transcervical inflatable mediastinoscopic esophagectomy versus thoracoscopic esophagectomy for local early- and intermediate-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis.
    Chen Z; Huang K; Wei R; Liu C; Fang Y; Wu B; Xu Z; Ding X; Tang H
    J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 125(5):839-846. PubMed ID: 35066884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
    Xu Y; Li XK; Cong ZZ; Zhou H; Wu WJ; Qiang Y; Yi J; Shen Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2021 Sep; 34(9):. PubMed ID: 33150401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimal invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant treatments.
    Chen D; Wang W; Mo J; Ren Q; Miao H; Chen Y; Wen Z
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):145. PubMed ID: 33563244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally Invasive
    Knitter S; Andreou A; Hofmann T; Chopra S; Denecke C; Thuss-Patience PC; Kröll D; Bahra M; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Biebl M
    Anticancer Res; 2021 Jul; 41(7):3499-3510. PubMed ID: 34230145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.