These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36583975)

  • 1. An Open Source Graph-Based Weighted Cycle Closure Method for Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations.
    Li Y; Liu R; Liu J; Luo H; Wu C; Li Z
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Jan; 63(2):561-570. PubMed ID: 36583975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of Different Automated Binding Pose Generation Approaches on Relative Binding Free Energy Simulations.
    Cappel D; Jerome S; Hessler G; Matter H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Mar; 60(3):1432-1444. PubMed ID: 31986249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations with FEP.
    Wang L; Chambers J; Abel R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2022():201-232. PubMed ID: 31396905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ligand Binding Thermodynamic Cycles: Hysteresis, the Locally Weighted Histogram Analysis Method, and the Overlapping States Matrix.
    Cui D; Zhang BW; Tan Z; Levy RM
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Jan; 16(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 31743019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations in Drug Discovery: Recent Advances and Practical Considerations.
    Cournia Z; Allen B; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Dec; 57(12):2911-2937. PubMed ID: 29243483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. To Design Scalable Free Energy Perturbation Networks, Optimal Is Not Enough.
    Pitman M; Hahn DF; Tresadern G; Mobley DL
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Mar; 63(6):1776-1793. PubMed ID: 36878475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations for Ligands with Diverse Scaffolds with the Alchemical Transfer Method.
    Azimi S; Khuttan S; Wu JZ; Pal RK; Gallicchio E
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Jan; 62(2):309-323. PubMed ID: 34990555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PHOENIX: a scoring function for affinity prediction derived using high-resolution crystal structures and calorimetry measurements.
    Tang YT; Marshall GR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Feb; 51(2):214-28. PubMed ID: 21214225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculation and Design of a Subnanomolar Inhibitor of Phosphodiesterase-10.
    Li Z; Huang Y; Wu Y; Chen J; Wu D; Zhan CG; Luo HB
    J Med Chem; 2019 Feb; 62(4):2099-2111. PubMed ID: 30689375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Calculation of relative binding free energy differences for fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase inhibitors using the thermodynamic cycle perturbation approach.
    Reddy MR; Erion MD
    J Am Chem Soc; 2001 Jul; 123(26):6246-52. PubMed ID: 11427047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations for Highly Flexible Protein MDM2 and Its Inhibitors.
    Singh N; Li W
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Jul; 21(13):. PubMed ID: 32635537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accelerating and Automating the Free Energy Perturbation Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculation with the RED-E Function.
    Liu R; Li W; Yao Y; Wu Y; Luo HB; Li Z
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Dec; 63(24):7755-7767. PubMed ID: 38048439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to deal with multiple binding poses in alchemical relative protein-ligand binding free energy calculations.
    Kaus JW; Harder E; Lin T; Abel R; McCammon JA; Wang L
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Jun; 11(6):2670-9. PubMed ID: 26085821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling Local Structural Rearrangements Using FEP/REST: Application to Relative Binding Affinity Predictions of CDK2 Inhibitors.
    Wang L; Deng Y; Knight JL; Wu Y; Kim B; Sherman W; Shelley JC; Lin T; Abel R
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2013 Feb; 9(2):1282-93. PubMed ID: 26588769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accurate calculation of absolute free energy of binding for SHP2 allosteric inhibitors using free energy perturbation.
    Liang L; Liu H; Xing G; Deng C; Hua Y; Gu R; Lu T; Chen Y; Zhang Y
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2022 May; 24(17):9904-9920. PubMed ID: 35416820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using physics-based pose predictions and free energy perturbation calculations to predict binding poses and relative binding affinities for FXR ligands in the D3R Grand Challenge 2.
    Athanasiou C; Vasilakaki S; Dellis D; Cournia Z
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):21-44. PubMed ID: 29119352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Free Energy Calculations for Protein-Ligand Binding Prediction.
    Jespers W; Åqvist J; Gutiérrez-de-Terán H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():203-226. PubMed ID: 33759129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the Predictive Power of Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations for Test Cases Involving Displacement of Binding Site Water Molecules.
    Wahl J; Smieško M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Feb; 59(2):754-765. PubMed ID: 30640456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
    Deng N; Flynn WF; Xia J; Vijayan RS; Zhang B; He P; Mentes A; Gallicchio E; Levy RM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):743-751. PubMed ID: 27562018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accurate Binding Free Energy Predictions in Fragment Optimization.
    Steinbrecher TB; Dahlgren M; Cappel D; Lin T; Wang L; Krilov G; Abel R; Friesner R; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Nov; 55(11):2411-20. PubMed ID: 26457994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.