These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3658420)

  • 21. Rapid quantification of adult and developing mouse spatial vision using a virtual optomotor system.
    Prusky GT; Alam NM; Beekman S; Douglas RM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Dec; 45(12):4611-6. PubMed ID: 15557474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of stimulus contrast on the accommodation response.
    Ward PA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1987; 7(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 3658431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ocular defocus, spurious resolution and contrast reversal.
    Smith G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1982; 2(1):5-23. PubMed ID: 7088556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spatial resolution, contrast sensitivity, and sensitivity to defocus of chicken retinal ganglion cells in vitro.
    Diedrich E; Schaeffel F
    Vis Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 26(5-6):467-76. PubMed ID: 19958566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optical quality of the eye in subjects with normal and excellent visual acuity.
    Villegas EA; Alcón E; Artal P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Oct; 49(10):4688-96. PubMed ID: 18552387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of spatial frequency on steady-state accommodation.
    Ward PA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1987; 7(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 3684273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pupillographic measurements with pattern stimulation: the pupil's response in normal subjects and first measurements in glaucoma patients.
    Link B; Jünemann A; Rix R; Sembritzki O; Brenning A; Korth M; Horn FK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 47(11):4947-55. PubMed ID: 17065512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Origin of notches in CSF: optical or neural?
    Apkarian P; Tijssen R; Spekreijse H; Regan D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1987 Mar; 28(3):607-12. PubMed ID: 3549615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Correlation of pupil size with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity after implantation of an apodized diffractive intraocular lens.
    Alfonso JF; Fernández-Vega L; Baamonde MB; Montés-Micó R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Mar; 33(3):430-8. PubMed ID: 17321393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Changes in through-focus spatial visual performance with adaptive optics correction of monochromatic aberrations.
    Guo H; Atchison DA; Birt BJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Aug; 48(17):1804-11. PubMed ID: 18597809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Contrast sensitivity loss in multiple sclerosis. Selectivity by eye, orientation, and spatial frequency measured with the evoked potential.
    Kupersmith MJ; Seiple WH; Nelson JI; Carr RE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1984 Jun; 25(6):632-9. PubMed ID: 6724832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evidence for delayed presbyopia after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia.
    Artola A; Patel S; Schimchak P; Ayala MJ; Ruiz-Moreno JM; Alió JL
    Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):735-41.e1. PubMed ID: 16650666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Superior short-wavelength contrast sensitivity in asthenopics during reflexive readjustments of ocular accommodation.
    Richter HO; Knez I
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Jul; 27(4):361-72. PubMed ID: 17584287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spatial frequency sensitivity differences between adults of good and poor reading ability.
    Patching GR; Jordan TR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 46(6):2219-24. PubMed ID: 15914644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Changes in contrast sensitivity induced by defocus and their possible relations to emmetropization in the chicken.
    Diether S; Gekeler F; Schaeffel F
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Nov; 42(12):3072-9. PubMed ID: 11687557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Static accommodative responses following adaptation to differential levels of blur.
    Cufflin MP; Hazel CA; Mallen EA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Jul; 27(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 17584286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Optical quality of the eye after lens replacement with a pseudoaccommodating intraocular lens.
    Montés-Micó R; Ferrer-Blasco T; Charman WN; Cerviño A; Alfonso JF; Fernández-Vega L
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):763-8. PubMed ID: 18471630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improved contrast sensitivity and visual acuity after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: in-depth statistical analysis.
    Tuan KM; Liang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Feb; 32(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 16564995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Time course of changes in ocular higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity after overnight orthokeratology.
    Hiraoka T; Okamoto C; Ishii Y; Kakita T; Okamoto F; Oshika T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Oct; 49(10):4314-20. PubMed ID: 18502987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Improved visual sensitivity during smooth pursuit eye movements: temporal and spatial characteristics.
    Schütz AC; Braun DI; Gegenfurtner KR
    Vis Neurosci; 2009; 26(3):329-40. PubMed ID: 19602304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.