These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36584390)

  • 1. Octanol/Air Partition Coefficient─A General-Purpose Fragment Model to Predict Log 
    Ebert RU; Kühne R; Schüürmann G
    Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Jan; 57(2):976-984. PubMed ID: 36584390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Henry's Law Constant─A General-Purpose Fragment Model to Predict Log
    Ebert RU; Kühne R; Schüürmann G
    Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Jan; 57(1):160-167. PubMed ID: 36520977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of prediction methods for octanol-air partition coefficients of diverse organic compounds.
    Fu Z; Chen J; Li X; Wang Y; Yu H
    Chemosphere; 2016 Apr; 148():118-25. PubMed ID: 26802270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliable Prediction of the Octanol-Air Partition Ratio.
    Baskaran S; Lei YD; Wania F
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2021 Nov; 40(11):3166-3180. PubMed ID: 34473856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of octanol-air partition coefficients for PCBs at different ambient temperatures based on the solvation free energy and the dimer ratio.
    Li W; Ding G; Gao H; Zhuang Y; Gu X; Peijnenburg WJGM
    Chemosphere; 2020 Mar; 242():125246. PubMed ID: 31704525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of octanol-air partition coefficients for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) using 3D-QSAR models.
    Chen Y; Cai X; Jiang L; Li Y
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2016 Feb; 124():202-212. PubMed ID: 26524653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using measured octanol-air partition coefficients to explain environmental partitioning of organochlorine pesticides.
    Shoeib M; Harner T
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 May; 21(5):984-90. PubMed ID: 12013145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. QSPR versus fragment-based methods to predict octanol-air partition coefficients: Revisiting a recent comparison of both approaches.
    Mathieu D
    Chemosphere; 2020 Apr; 245():125584. PubMed ID: 31864054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of polyparameter linear free energy relationship models for octanol-air partition coefficients of diverse chemicals.
    Jin X; Fu Z; Li X; Chen J
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2017 Mar; 19(3):300-306. PubMed ID: 28154864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting octanol/water partition coefficients for the SAMPL6 challenge using the SM12, SM8, and SMD solvation models.
    Ouimet JA; Paluch AS
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):575-588. PubMed ID: 32002781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying uncertainty in physical-chemical property estimation with IFSQSAR.
    Brown TN; Sangion A; Arnot JA
    J Cheminform; 2024 May; 16(1):65. PubMed ID: 38816859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved prediction of PFAS partitioning with PPLFERs and QSPRs.
    Brown TN; Armitage JM; Sangion A; Arnot JA
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2024 Nov; 26(11):1986-1998. PubMed ID: 39344262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination and prediction of octanol-air partition coefficients for organophosphate flame retardants.
    Wang Q; Zhao H; Wang Y; Xie Q; Chen J; Quan X
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2017 Nov; 145():283-288. PubMed ID: 28755645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Octanol-water partition coefficient measurements for the SAMPL6 blind prediction challenge.
    Işık M; Levorse D; Mobley DL; Rhodes T; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):405-420. PubMed ID: 31858363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of the n-octanol/water partition coefficients in the SAMPL6 blind challenge from MST continuum solvation calculations.
    Zamora WJ; Pinheiro S; German K; Ràfols C; Curutchet C; Luque FJ
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):443-451. PubMed ID: 31776809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modelling the octanol-air partition coefficient of aromatic pollutants based on the solvation free energy and the dimer effect.
    Li W; Chen D; Chen S; Zhang J; Song G; Shi Y; Sun Y; Ding G; Peijnenburg WJGM
    Chemosphere; 2022 Dec; 309(Pt 1):136608. PubMed ID: 36183880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calculating the Partition Coefficients of Organic Solvents in Octanol/Water and Octanol/Air.
    Nedyalkova MA; Madurga S; Tobiszewski M; Simeonov V
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 May; 59(5):2257-2263. PubMed ID: 31042037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of multimedia models for understanding the environmental behavior of volatile methylsiloxanes: Fate, transport, and bioaccumulation.
    Whelan MJ; Kim J
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2022 May; 18(3):599-621. PubMed ID: 34375022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the accuracy of octanol-water partition coefficient predictions in the SAMPL6 Part II log P Challenge.
    Işık M; Bergazin TD; Fox T; Rizzi A; Chodera JD; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):335-370. PubMed ID: 32107702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Slopes and intercepts from log-log correlations of gas/particle quotient and octanol-air partition coefficient (vapor-pressure) for semi-volatile organic compounds: II. Theoretical predictions vs. monitoring.
    Qiao LN; Ma WL; Zhang ZF; Liu LY; Song WW; Jia HL; Zhu NZ; Li WL; Macdonald RW; Nikolaev A; Li YF
    Chemosphere; 2021 Jun; 273():128860. PubMed ID: 33218730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.