149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36584412)
21. DETERMINATION OF ENTRANCE SURFACE DOSE FOR THREE COMMON PLANAR DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXAMINATIONS.
Jeyasugiththan J; Ehalagasthanna GPNT; Hishaam U; Satharasinghe DM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2022 Oct; 198(18):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 36037526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Studying the dose level for different X-ray energy conventional radiography by TLD-100.
Ghoneam SM; Mahmoud KR; Diab HM; El-Sersy A
Appl Radiat Isot; 2022 Mar; 181():110066. PubMed ID: 34968881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Patient dose measurement in common medical X-ray examinations in Iran.
Rasuli B; Mahmoud-Pashazadeh A; Ghorbani M; Juybari RT; Naserpour M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):374-386. PubMed ID: 26894357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Radiation dose and image quality comparison during spine surgery with two different, intraoperative 3D imaging navigation systems.
Nachabe R; Strauss K; Schueler B; Bydon M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 20(2):136-145. PubMed ID: 30677233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic reference level for adult pelvic examination in several hospitals of Taif and Kharaj city, Saudi Arabia.
Osman H; Raafat BM; Faizo NL; Ahmed RM; Alamri S; Alghamdi AJ; Almahwasi A; Alharbi MKM; Sulieman A; Khandaker MU
Appl Radiat Isot; 2022 Feb; 180():110049. PubMed ID: 34864437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of image quality among three X-ray systems for chest radiography: first step in optimisation.
Nocetti D; Ubeda C; Calcagno S; Acevedo J; Pardo D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):386-91. PubMed ID: 25821212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Assessment of patient dose and optimization levels in chest and abdomen CR examinations at referral hospitals in Tanzania.
Masoud AO; Muhogora WE; Msaki PK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):435–441. PubMed ID: 26699324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of full field digital (FFD) and computed radiography (CR) mammography systems in Greece.
Kalathaki M; Hourdakis CJ; Economides S; Tritakis P; Kalyvas N; Simantirakis G; Manousaridis G; Kaisas I; Kamenopoulou V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):202-5. PubMed ID: 21821614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Regional survey of entrance surface dose to patients from X-ray examinations in Saudi Arabia.
Saeed MK
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Jun; 38(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 25801149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Performance evaluation of an 85-cm-bore X-ray computed tomography scanner designed for radiation oncology and comparison with current diagnostic CT scanners.
Garcia-Ramirez JL; Mutic S; Dempsey JF; Low DA; Purdy JA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(4):1123-31. PubMed ID: 11958910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Radiation dose reduction and image quality evaluation for lateral lumbar spine projection.
Nocetti D; Villalobos K; Marín N; Monardes M; Tapia B; Toledo MI; Villegas C
Heliyon; 2023 Sep; 9(9):e19509. PubMed ID: 37681134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An approach for the online determination of Entrance Surface Air Kerma (ESAK) from Kerma Area product (P
Suliman II
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2022 Dec; 45(4):1055-1061. PubMed ID: 36107385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Lifetime attributable risk of cancer incidence and mortality in routine digital radiology procedures.
Zangeneh M; Deevband MR; Mohsenzadeh B
Clin Imaging; 2020 Nov; 67():226-236. PubMed ID: 32871427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dose optimisation in computed radiography.
Schreiner-Karoussou A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16461522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Performance evaluation of two computed radiography systems and patient dose in pelvic examination.
Elshiekh E; Suliman II; Habbani F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):392-6. PubMed ID: 25836691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. ESTIMATION OF THE ORGAN AND EFFECTIVE DOSE TO PATIENTS UNDERGOING MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXAMINATIONS IN SAUDI ARABIA.
Ababneh ZQ; Almusallam M; Alfajri I; Ababneh AM; Aljarrah KM; Tries MA; Al Anazi N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 May; 194(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 33940619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dosimetry of pediatric chest X-Ray examinations in Togo.
Adambounou K; Sedo K; Yao Adigo AM; Sonhaye L; Sodogas F; Adjenou V
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Jun; 52(2):265-271. PubMed ID: 33632622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Entrance surface doses to patients undergoing selected diagnostic X-ray examinations in Sudan.
Suliman II; Abbas N; Habbani FI
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 16973669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [A study of entrance surface dose with CR and film/screen systems, and analysis of the X-ray conditions for chest radiography].
Mori T; Muto H
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2000 Dec; 60(14):863-7. PubMed ID: 11197837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dynamic flat panel detector versus image intensifier in cardiac imaging: dose and image quality.
Vano E; Geiger B; Schreiner A; Back C; Beissel J
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5731-42. PubMed ID: 16306664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
