These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36584549)

  • 1. The role of task-relevant and task-irrelevant information in congruency sequence effects: Applying the diffusion model for conflict tasks.
    Koob V; Mackenzie I; Ulrich R; Leuthold H; Janczyk M
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Feb; 140():101528. PubMed ID: 36584549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A diffusion model for the congruency sequence effect.
    Luo C; Proctor RW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Dec; 29(6):2034-2051. PubMed ID: 35676612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks.
    Mittelstädt V; Ulrich R; König J; Hofbauer K; Mackenzie IG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):949-959. PubMed ID: 36316615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multimodal Simon Effect: A Multimodal Extension of the Diffusion Model for Conflict Tasks.
    Mahani MN; Bausenhart KM; Ahmadabadi MN; Ulrich R
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():507. PubMed ID: 30687039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A revised diffusion model for conflict tasks.
    Lee PS; Sewell DK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 37507646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Registered Replication Report of Weissman, D. H., Jiang, J., & Egner, T. (2014). Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds.
    Gyurkovics M; Kovacs M; Jaquiery M; Palfi B; Dechterenko F; Aczel B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Nov; 82(8):3777-3787. PubMed ID: 32935289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Congruency sequence effect in cross-task context: evidence for dimension-specific modulation.
    Lee J; Cho YS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):617-27. PubMed ID: 24184348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Further Evidence for the Binding and Retrieval of Control-States From the Flanker Task.
    Dignath D; Kiesel A
    Exp Psychol; 2021 Sep; 68(5):264-273. PubMed ID: 34911358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Control processes through the suppression of the automatic response activation triggered by task-irrelevant information in the Simon-type tasks.
    Kim S; Lee SH; Cho YS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Nov; 162():51-61. PubMed ID: 26479902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interacting congruency effects in the hybrid Stroop-Simon task prevent conclusions regarding the domain specificity or generality of the congruency sequence effect.
    Weissman DH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 May; 46(5):945-967. PubMed ID: 31580121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple expectancies underlie the congruency sequence effect in confound-minimized tasks.
    Erb CD; Aschenbrenner AJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102869. PubMed ID: 31228719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of conflict trial proportion: A comparison of the Eriksen and Simon tasks.
    Bausenhart KM; Ulrich R; Miller J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):810-836. PubMed ID: 33269440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related deficits in the congruency sequence effect are task-specific: An investigation of nine tasks.
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M
    Psychol Aging; 2020 Aug; 35(5):744-764. PubMed ID: 32744855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of temporal order of relevant and irrelevant dimensions within conflict tasks.
    Mackenzie IG; Mittelstädt V; Ulrich R; Leuthold H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1099-1115. PubMed ID: 35980705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conflict resolution in the Eriksen flanker task: Similarities and differences to the Simon task.
    Hübner R; Töbel L
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214203. PubMed ID: 30921368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A model-based approach to disentangling facilitation and interference effects in conflict tasks.
    Evans NJ; Servant M
    Psychol Rev; 2022 Oct; 129(5):1183-1209. PubMed ID: 35482645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Event-related potential indices of congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds.
    Larson MJ; Clayson PE; Kirwan CB; Weissman DH
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jun; 53(6):814-22. PubMed ID: 26854028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance-contingent reward increases the use of congruent distracting information.
    Fröber K; Lerche V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):905-929. PubMed ID: 36918512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distributional analyses reveal the individual differences in congruency sequence effect.
    Tang D; Chen X; Li H; Lei Y
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272621. PubMed ID: 35994475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The congruency sequence effect 3.0: a critical test of conflict adaptation.
    Duthoo W; Abrahamse EL; Braem S; Boehler CN; Notebaert W
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110462. PubMed ID: 25340396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.