These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36584758)

  • 1. Neural tracking of linguistic and acoustic speech representations decreases with advancing age.
    Gillis M; Kries J; Vandermosten M; Francart T
    Neuroimage; 2023 Feb; 267():119841. PubMed ID: 36584758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural Markers of Speech Comprehension: Measuring EEG Tracking of Linguistic Speech Representations, Controlling the Speech Acoustics.
    Gillis M; Vanthornhout J; Simon JZ; Francart T; Brodbeck C
    J Neurosci; 2021 Dec; 41(50):10316-10329. PubMed ID: 34732519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural encoding of linguistic speech cues is unaffected by cognitive decline, but decreases with increasing hearing impairment.
    Bolt E; Giroud N
    Sci Rep; 2024 Aug; 14(1):19105. PubMed ID: 39154048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A tradeoff between acoustic and linguistic feature encoding in spoken language comprehension.
    Tezcan F; Weissbart H; Martin AE
    Elife; 2023 Jul; 12():. PubMed ID: 37417736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distinct roles of delta- and theta-band neural tracking for sharpening and predictive coding of multi-level speech features during spoken language processing.
    Mai G; Wang WS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2023 Dec; 44(17):6149-6172. PubMed ID: 37818940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural Speech Tracking in the Theta and in the Delta Frequency Band Differentially Encode Clarity and Comprehension of Speech in Noise.
    Etard O; Reichenbach T
    J Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 39(29):5750-5759. PubMed ID: 31109963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring neural tracking of acoustic and linguistic speech representations in individuals with post-stroke aphasia.
    Kries J; De Clercq P; Gillis M; Vanthornhout J; Lemmens R; Francart T; Vandermosten M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2024 Jun; 45(8):e26676. PubMed ID: 38798131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence for enhanced neural tracking of the speech envelope underlying age-related speech-in-noise difficulties.
    Decruy L; Vanthornhout J; Francart T
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Aug; 122(2):601-615. PubMed ID: 31141449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech Understanding Oppositely Affects Acoustic and Linguistic Neural Tracking in a Speech Rate Manipulation Paradigm.
    Verschueren E; Gillis M; Decruy L; Vanthornhout J; Francart T
    J Neurosci; 2022 Sep; 42(39):7442-7453. PubMed ID: 36041851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cortical encoding of hierarchical linguistic information when syllabic rhythms are obscured by echoes.
    Luo C; Ding N
    Neuroimage; 2024 Oct; 300():120875. PubMed ID: 39341475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sleep Disrupts High-Level Speech Parsing Despite Significant Basic Auditory Processing.
    Makov S; Sharon O; Ding N; Ben-Shachar M; Nir Y; Zion Golumbic E
    J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(32):7772-7781. PubMed ID: 28626013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Leading and following: Noise differently affects semantic and acoustic processing during naturalistic speech comprehension.
    Zhang X; Li J; Li Z; Hong B; Diao T; Ma X; Nolte G; Engel AK; Zhang D
    Neuroimage; 2023 Nov; 282():120404. PubMed ID: 37806465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attention Differentially Affects Acoustic and Phonetic Feature Encoding in a Multispeaker Environment.
    Teoh ES; Ahmed F; Lalor EC
    J Neurosci; 2022 Jan; 42(4):682-691. PubMed ID: 34893546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of speech masking on neural tracking of acoustic and semantic features of natural speech.
    Yasmin S; Irsik VC; Johnsrude IS; Herrmann B
    Neuropsychologia; 2023 Jul; 186():108584. PubMed ID: 37169066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Generalizable EEG Encoding Models with Naturalistic Audiovisual Stimuli.
    Desai M; Holder J; Villarreal C; Clark N; Hoang B; Hamilton LS
    J Neurosci; 2021 Oct; 41(43):8946-8962. PubMed ID: 34503996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural tracking measures of speech intelligibility: Manipulating intelligibility while keeping acoustics unchanged.
    Karunathilake IMD; Kulasingham JP; Simon JZ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Dec; 120(49):e2309166120. PubMed ID: 38032934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of stimulus intensity on neural envelope tracking.
    Verschueren E; Vanthornhout J; Francart T
    Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 403():108175. PubMed ID: 33494033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Affective and linguistic processing of speech prosody: DC potential studies.
    Pihan H
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 156():269-84. PubMed ID: 17015085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural tracking as a diagnostic tool to assess the auditory pathway.
    Gillis M; Van Canneyt J; Francart T; Vanthornhout J
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108607. PubMed ID: 36137861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Linguistic Processing in a Semantic Judgment Task: An Aging Study.
    Stanley N; Davis T; Estis J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Mar; 28(3):209-221. PubMed ID: 28277212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.