148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36585296)
1. Quality of life of patients treated for kidney stones 10-20mm in diameter in terms of the type of operation performed: A qualitative study.
de Bayser H; Neuville P; Etienne J; Paparel P; Badet L; Abid N
Prog Urol; 2023 Feb; 33(2):88-95. PubMed ID: 36585296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Yuri P; Hariwibowo R; Soeroharjo I; Danarto R; Hendri AZ; Brodjonegoro SR; Rasyid N; Birowo P; Widyahening IS
Acta Med Indones; 2018 Jan; 50(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 29686172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The clinical and cost effectiveness of surgical interventions for stones in the lower pole of the kidney: the percutaneous nephrolithotomy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole kidney stones randomised controlled trial (PUrE RCT) protocol.
McClinton S; Starr K; Thomas R; MacLennan G; Lam T; Hernandez R; Pickard R; Anson K; Clark T; MacLennan S; Thomas D; Smith D; Turney B; McDonald A; Cameron S; Wiseman O
Trials; 2020 Jun; 21(1):479. PubMed ID: 32498699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment selection for urolithiasis: percutaneous nephrolithomy, ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, and active monitoring.
Desai M; Sun Y; Buchholz N; Fuller A; Matsuda T; Matlaga B; Miller N; Bolton D; Alomar M; Ganpule A
World J Urol; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1395-1399. PubMed ID: 28303335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term evaluation of outcomes and costs of urolithiasis re-interventions after ureteroscopy, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy based on German health insurance claims data.
Konnopka C; Becker B; Netsch C; Herrmann TRW; Gross AJ; Lusuardi L; Knoll T; König HH
World J Urol; 2022 Dec; 40(12):3021-3027. PubMed ID: 36239809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Complications in endourology: Ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy].
Doizi S; Bensalah K; Lebacle C; Legeais D; Madec FX; Mathieu R; Phé V; Pignot G; Irani J
Prog Urol; 2022 Nov; 32(14):966-976. PubMed ID: 36410868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.
Srisubat A; Potisat S; Lojanapiwat B; Setthawong V; Laopaiboon M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD007044. PubMed ID: 19821393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How to estimate stone volume and its use in stone surgery: a comprehensive review.
Panthier F; Kutchukian S; Ducousso H; Doizi S; Solano C; Candela L; Corrales M; Chicaud M; Traxer O; Hautekeete S; Tailly T
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2024; 48(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 37657708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, Standard and Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for the Management of 1-2cm Renal Stones.
Wymer KM; Sharma V; Juvet T; Klett DE; Borah BJ; Koo K; Rivera M; Agarwal D; Humphreys MR; Potretzke AM
Urology; 2021 Oct; 156():71-77. PubMed ID: 34274389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Technique, complications, and outcomes of pediatric urolithiasis management at a tertiary care hospital: evolving paradigms over the last 15 years.
Yadav P; Madhavan K; Syal S; Farooq A; Srivastava A; Ansari MS
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Dec; 15(6):665.e1-665.e7. PubMed ID: 31648889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Staged retrograde flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones of 2-4 cm in diameter: a randomized controlled trial].
Li JW; Wang F; Cai FZ; Gao HZ
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2016 Dec; 36(12):1672-1676. PubMed ID: 27998863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultra-Mini PCNL, Flexible Ureteroscopy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy on the Treatment of 1-2 cm Lower Pole Renal Calculi.
Zhang H; Hong TY; Li G; Jiang N; Hu C; Cui X; Chu C; Zhao JL
Urol Int; 2019; 102(2):153-159. PubMed ID: 30352443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Current aspects in pediatric urolithiasis treatment].
Strohmaier WL
Urologe A; 2020 Mar; 59(3):289-293. PubMed ID: 32006059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe alternative to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for high-density, renal stones: a prospective, randomised trial.
Ahmed AF; Abdelazim H; ElMesery M; El-Feky M; Gomaa A; Tagreda I; Abozied H; Fahim A
BJU Int; 2021 Dec; 128(6):744-751. PubMed ID: 34028170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment for residual stones using flexible ureteroscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy after the management of complex calculi with single-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Chen L; Sha ML; Li D; Zhuo J; Jiang CY; Zhu YP; Xia SJ; Lu J; Shao Y
Lasers Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 32(3):649-654. PubMed ID: 28161725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm : A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
Junbo L; Yugen L; Guo J; Jing H; Ruichao Y; Tao W
Urol J; 2019 May; 16(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 30604405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2-4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis.
Akman T; Binbay M; Ozgor F; Ugurlu M; Tekinarslan E; Kezer C; Aslan R; Muslumanoglu AY
BJU Int; 2012 May; 109(9):1384-9. PubMed ID: 22093679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Surgical Technique of Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.
Sadiq AS; Atallah W; Khusid J; Gupta M
J Endourol; 2021 Sep; 35(S2):S68-S74. PubMed ID: 34499550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endourologic Management (PCNL, URS, SWL) of Stones in Solitary Kidney: A Systematic Review from European Association of Urologists Young Academic Urologists and Uro-Technology Groups.
Pietropaolo A; Reeves T; Aboumarzouk O; Kallidonis P; Ozsoy M; Skolarikos A; Tailly T; Liatsikos E; Traxer O; Somani BK
J Endourol; 2020 Jan; 34(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 31456421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study.
Chan LH; Good DW; Laing K; Phipps S; Thomas BG; Keanie JY; Tolley DA; Cutress ML
J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):510-516. PubMed ID: 28355100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
