149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36585296)
21. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: is it still valid in the era of robotic endourology? Can it be more efficient?
Rassweiler J; Rieker P; Rassweiler-Seyfried MC
Curr Opin Urol; 2020 Mar; 30(2):120-129. PubMed ID: 31990816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The management of paediatric urolithiasis.
Choong S; Whitfield H; Duffy P; Kellett M; Cuckow P; Van't Hoff W; Corry D
BJU Int; 2000 Nov; 86(7):857-60. PubMed ID: 11069414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones.
Breda A; Ogunyemi O; Leppert JT; Schulam PG
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1190-6. PubMed ID: 18571315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. reply letter to Reply letter to: Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm : A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
Cubuk A; Özkaptan O; Sahan A
Urol J; 2021 Jan; 18(3):351-352. PubMed ID: 33495987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Outcomes and costs of ureteroscopy, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of urolithiasis: an analysis based on health insurance claims data in Germany.
Schulz C; Becker B; Netsch C; Herrmann TRW; Gross AJ; Westphal J; Knoll T; König HH
World J Urol; 2022 Mar; 40(3):781-788. PubMed ID: 34910235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of lower pole renal stones.
Grisard S; Franquet Q; Garnier-Crussard A; Poncet D; Overs C; Matillon X; Long JA; Descotes JL; Badet L; Abid N; Fiard G
Prog Urol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 34332831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Tailored minimally invasive management of complex calculi in horseshoe kidney.
Ding J; Zhang Y; Cao Q; Huang T; Xu W; Huang K; Fang J; Bai Q; Qi J; Huang Y
J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(5):601-10. PubMed ID: 26409427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Effectiveness of flexible ureteroscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for kidney stones treatment].
Ravier E; Abid N; Ruffion A; Fassi-Fehri H; Buron C; Ganne C; Mallet A; Martin X
Prog Urol; 2015 Apr; 25(5):233-9. PubMed ID: 25640027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Urolithiasis after ileal conduit urinary diversion: a comparison of minimally invasive therapies.
Hertzig LL; Iwaszko MR; Rangel LJ; Patterson DE; Gettman MT; Krambeck AE
J Urol; 2013 Jun; 189(6):2152-7. PubMed ID: 23228383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Urolithiasis in the horseshoe kidney: a single-centre experience.
Symons SJ; Ramachandran A; Kurien A; Baiysha R; Desai MR
BJU Int; 2008 Dec; 102(11):1676-80. PubMed ID: 18782315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Is mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy a safe alternative to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in pediatric age group in borderline stones? a randomized prospective study.
Farouk A; Tawfick A; Shoeb M; Mahmoud MA; Mostafa DE; Hasan M; Abdalla HM
World J Urol; 2018 Jul; 36(7):1139-1147. PubMed ID: 29450731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The use of intelligent analysis (IA) in determining the tactics of treating patients with nephrolithiasis.
Alexander Izrailevich N; Boris Alexandrovich N; Artem Vladimirovich E; Leonid Grigoryevich S; Dmitry Olegovich K; Dmitry Georgievich T; Leonid Moiseevich R
Urologia; 2023 Nov; 90(4):663-669. PubMed ID: 37006180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Tsai SH; Chung HJ; Tseng PT; Wu YC; Tu YK; Hsu CW; Lei WT
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Mar; 99(10):e19403. PubMed ID: 32150088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Impact of the acquisition of a flexible ureteroscope on the management of upper urinary tract stones in children].
Tondut L; Peyronnet B; Arnaud A; Freton L; Hascoet J; Pradère B; Berquet G; Habonimana E; Verhoest G; Azzis O; Fremond B; Bensalah K
Prog Urol; 2016 Feb; 26(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 26681576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteropyeloscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing clinical efficacy and safety profile.
Davis NF; Quinlan MR; Poyet C; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM; Webb D; Jack GS
World J Urol; 2018 Jul; 36(7):1127-1138. PubMed ID: 29450733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Evolution of urolithiasis treatment over 30 years in a French academic institution].
Doizi S; Raynal G; Traxer O
Prog Urol; 2015 Jul; 25(9):543-8. PubMed ID: 26094095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparative outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for pediatric kidney stones larger than 2 cm.
Zhang Y; Li J; Jiao JW; Tian Y
Int J Urol; 2021 Jun; 28(6):650-655. PubMed ID: 33754401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Endoscopic-assisted robotic pyelolithotomy: a viable treatment option for complex pediatric nephrolithiasis.
Roth JD; Gargollo PC; DaJusta DG; Lindgren BW; Noh PH; Rensing AJ; Krambeck AE; Whittam BM;
J Pediatr Urol; 2020 Apr; 16(2):192.e1-192.e5. PubMed ID: 31932240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), regular and small sized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in daily practice: European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS) Survey.
Zanetti SP; Boeri L; Catellani M; Gallioli A; Trinchieri A; Sarica K; Montanari E
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2016 Oct; 88(3):212-216. PubMed ID: 27711096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy in terms of cost-effectiveness in patients with 10-30 mm renal stones.
Erdoğan A; Keskin E; Altun A
Urologia; 2020 Feb; 87(1):41-46. PubMed ID: 31545662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
