1157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36585641)
1. Application of machine learning techniques for predicting survival in ovarian cancer.
Sorayaie Azar A; Babaei Rikan S; Naemi A; Bagherzadeh Mohasefi J; Pirnejad H; Bagherzadeh Mohasefi M; Wiil UK
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Dec; 22(1):345. PubMed ID: 36585641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of interpretable machine learning algorithms to predict distant metastasis in ovarian clear cell carcinoma.
Guo QH; Xie FC; Zhong FM; Wen W; Zhang XR; Yu XJ; Wang XL; Huang B; Li LP; Wang XZ
Cancer Med; 2024 Apr; 13(7):e7161. PubMed ID: 38613173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of interpretable machine learning algorithms to predict distant metastasis in osteosarcoma.
Bai BL; Wu ZY; Weng SJ; Yang Q
Cancer Med; 2023 Feb; 12(4):5025-5034. PubMed ID: 36082478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Machine learning-based models for the prediction of breast cancer recurrence risk.
Zuo D; Yang L; Jin Y; Qi H; Liu Y; Ren L
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 Nov; 23(1):276. PubMed ID: 38031071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of machine learning approaches to predict the 5-year survival status of patients with esophageal cancer.
Gong X; Zheng B; Xu G; Chen H; Chen C
J Thorac Dis; 2021 Nov; 13(11):6240-6251. PubMed ID: 34992804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. XGBoost-SHAP-based interpretable diagnostic framework for alzheimer's disease.
Yi F; Yang H; Chen D; Qin Y; Han H; Cui J; Bai W; Ma Y; Zhang R; Yu H
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 Jul; 23(1):137. PubMed ID: 37491248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model to Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Laryngeal Carcinoma.
Feng M; Zhang J; Zhou X; Mo H; Jia L; Zhang C; Hu Y; Yuan W
J Oncol; 2022; 2022():6356399. PubMed ID: 36411795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A 5-year survival status prognosis of nonmetastatic cervical cancer patients through machine learning algorithms.
Yu W; Lu Y; Shou H; Xu H; Shi L; Geng X; Song T
Cancer Med; 2023 Mar; 12(6):6867-6876. PubMed ID: 36479910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Risk Prediction Model for Physical Restraints Among Older Chinese Adults in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning Study.
Wang J; Chen H; Wang H; Liu W; Peng D; Zhao Q; Xiao M
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Apr; 25():e43815. PubMed ID: 37023416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Explainable machine learning in outcome prediction of high-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Shu L; Yan H; Wu Y; Yan T; Yang L; Zhang S; Chen Z; Liao Q; Yang L; Xiao B; Ye M; Lv S; Wu M; Zhu X; Hu P
Aging (Albany NY); 2024 Mar; 16(5):4654-4669. PubMed ID: 38431285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictive model and risk analysis for peripheral vascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients using machine learning and shapley additive explanation.
Liu L; Bi B; Cao L; Gui M; Ju F
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2024; 15():1320335. PubMed ID: 38481447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of machine learning model in predicting the likelihood of blood transfusion after hip fracture surgery.
Chen X; Pan J; Li Y; Tang R
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2023 Nov; 35(11):2643-2656. PubMed ID: 37733228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury after Extracorporeal Cardiac Surgery (CSA-AKI) by Machine Learning Algorithms.
Tong Y; Niu X; Liu F
Heart Surg Forum; 2023 Oct; 26(5):E537-E551. PubMed ID: 37920093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The prediction of in-hospital mortality in chronic kidney disease patients with coronary artery disease using machine learning models.
Ye Z; An S; Gao Y; Xie E; Zhao X; Guo Z; Li Y; Shen N; Ren J; Zheng J
Eur J Med Res; 2023 Jan; 28(1):33. PubMed ID: 36653875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Seasonal prediction of daily PM
Wu Y; Lin S; Shi K; Ye Z; Fang Y
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jun; 29(30):45821-45836. PubMed ID: 35150424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An interpretable machine learning prognostic system for risk stratification in oropharyngeal cancer.
Alabi RO; Almangush A; Elmusrati M; Leivo I; Mäkitie AA
Int J Med Inform; 2022 Dec; 168():104896. PubMed ID: 36279655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of prediction models for one-year brain tumour survival using machine learning: a comparison of accuracy and interpretability.
Charlton CE; Poon MTC; Brennan PM; Fleuriot JD
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 May; 233():107482. PubMed ID: 36947980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application value of the automated machine learning model based on modified CT index combined with serological indices in the early prediction of lung cancer.
Meng L; Zhu P; Xia K
Front Public Health; 2024; 12():1368217. PubMed ID: 38645446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Survival prediction of glioblastoma patients using modern deep learning and machine learning techniques.
Babaei Rikan S; Sorayaie Azar A; Naemi A; Bagherzadeh Mohasefi J; Pirnejad H; Wiil UK
Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):2371. PubMed ID: 38287149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive modeling of blood pressure during hemodialysis: a comparison of linear model, random forest, support vector regression, XGBoost, LASSO regression and ensemble method.
Huang JC; Tsai YC; Wu PY; Lien YH; Chien CY; Kuo CF; Hung JF; Chen SC; Kuo CH
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 195():105536. PubMed ID: 32485511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
