These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36585732)

  • 21. Using Convolutional Neural Networks for Enhanced Capture of Breast Parenchymal Complexity Patterns Associated with Breast Cancer Risk.
    Gastounioti A; Oustimov A; Hsieh MK; Pantalone L; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):977-984. PubMed ID: 29395798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A novel and fully automated mammographic texture analysis for risk prediction: results from two case-control studies.
    Wang C; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Harkness EF; Evans DG; Astley S
    Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Oct; 19(1):114. PubMed ID: 29047382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Breast parenchymal patterns in processed versus raw digital mammograms: A large population study toward assessing differences in quantitative measures across image representations.
    Gastounioti A; Oustimov A; Keller BM; Pantalone L; Hsieh MK; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 43(11):5862. PubMed ID: 27806604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status.
    Byrne C; Schairer C; Wolfe J; Parekh N; Salane M; Brinton LA; Hoover R; Haile R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1995 Nov; 87(21):1622-9. PubMed ID: 7563205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sensitivity of screening mammography by density and texture: a cohort study from a population-based screening program in Denmark.
    von Euler-Chelpin M; Lillholm M; Vejborg I; Nielsen M; Lynge E
    Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Oct; 21(1):111. PubMed ID: 31623646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of a Four-View Mammographic Image Feature Based Fusion Model to Predict Near-Term Breast Cancer Risk.
    Tan M; Pu J; Cheng S; Liu H; Zheng B
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 43(10):2416-28. PubMed ID: 25851469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer: Additive Value of Radiomics of Breast Parenchyma.
    Li H; Mendel KR; Lan L; Sheth D; Giger ML
    Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 30747591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Risk stratification of women with false-positive test results in mammography screening based on mammographic morphology and density: A case control study.
    Winkel RR; Euler-Chelpin MV; Lynge E; Diao P; Lillholm M; Kallenberg M; Forman JL; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Nielsen M; Vejborg I
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 49():53-60. PubMed ID: 28558329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mammographic texture resemblance generalizes as an independent risk factor for breast cancer.
    Nielsen M; Vachon CM; Scott CG; Chernoff K; Karemore G; Karssemeijer N; Lillholm M; Karsdal MA
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014 Apr; 16(2):R37. PubMed ID: 24713478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2 mutation status: a cross-sectional study.
    Gierach GL; Li H; Loud JT; Greene MH; Chow CK; Lan L; Prindiville SA; Eng-Wong J; Soballe PW; Giambartolomei C; Mai PL; Galbo CE; Nichols K; Calzone KA; Olopade OI; Gail MH; Giger ML
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014; 16(4):424. PubMed ID: 25159706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment.
    Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Lan L
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 17434064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mammographic breast density and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bodewes FTH; van Asselt AA; Dorrius MD; Greuter MJW; de Bock GH
    Breast; 2022 Dec; 66():62-68. PubMed ID: 36183671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Breast cancer risk and measured mammographic density.
    Yaffe MJ; Boyd NF; Byng JW; Jong RA; Fishell E; Lockwood GA; Little LE; Tritchler DL
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 1998 Feb; 7 Suppl 1():S47-55. PubMed ID: 10866036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Using automated texture features to determine the probability for masking of a tumor on mammography, but not ultrasound.
    Häberle L; Hack CC; Heusinger K; Wagner F; Jud SM; Uder M; Beckmann MW; Schulz-Wendtland R; Wittenberg T; Fasching PA
    Eur J Med Res; 2017 Aug; 22(1):30. PubMed ID: 28854966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Digital breast tomosynthesis compared to diagnostic mammographic projections (including magnification) among women recalled at screening mammography: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC).
    Canelo-Aybar C; Carrera L; Beltrán J; Posso M; Rigau D; Lebeau A; Gräwingholt A; Castells X; Langendam M; Pérez E; Giorgi Rossi P; Van Engen R; Parmelli E; Saz-Parkinson Z; Alonso-Coello P
    Cancer Med; 2021 Apr; 10(7):2191-2204. PubMed ID: 33675147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Machine Learning for Workflow Applications in Screening Mammography: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Hickman SE; Woitek R; Le EPV; Im YR; Mouritsen Luxhøj C; Aviles-Rivero AI; Baxter GC; MacKay JW; Gilbert FJ
    Radiology; 2022 Jan; 302(1):88-104. PubMed ID: 34665034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Parenchymal pattern in women with dense breasts. Variation with age and impact on screening outcomes: observations from a UK screening programme.
    Ward L; Heller S; Hudson S; Wilkinson L
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4717-4724. PubMed ID: 29808426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A genome-wide association study of mammographic texture variation.
    Liu Y; Chen H; Heine J; Lindstrom S; Turman C; Warner ET; Winham SJ; Vachon CM; Tamimi RM; Kraft P; Jiang X
    Breast Cancer Res; 2022 Nov; 24(1):76. PubMed ID: 36344993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Image retrieval-based parenchymal analysis for breast cancer risk assessment.
    Padilla A; Arponen O; Rinta-Kiikka I; Pertuz S
    Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 49(2):1055-1064. PubMed ID: 34837254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.