BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36585776)

  • 1. Long-term clinical and functional results of magnetic sphincter augmentation.
    Sarici IS; Dunn CP; Eriksson SE; Jobe BA; Ayazi S
    Dis Esophagus; 2023 Jun; 36(Supplement_1):. PubMed ID: 36585776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. LINX
    Skubleny D; Switzer NJ; Dang J; Gill RS; Shi X; de Gara C; Birch DW; Wong C; Hutter MM; Karmali S
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3078-3084. PubMed ID: 27981382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. S148: Long-term patient-reported outcomes of laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication: a 5-year follow-up study.
    O'Neill SM; Jalilvand AD; Colvin JS; Haisley KR; Perry KA
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Sep; 36(9):6851-6858. PubMed ID: 35041056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Fundoplication and Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for the Treatment of Medically Refractory GERD.
    Richards WO; McRae C
    Am Surg; 2018 Nov; 84(11):1762-1767. PubMed ID: 30747630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early results of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Aiolfi A; Asti E; Bernardi D; Bonitta G; Rausa E; Siboni S; Bonavina L
    Int J Surg; 2018 Apr; 52():82-88. PubMed ID: 29471155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation vs Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: A Matched-Pair Analysis of 100 Patients.
    Reynolds JL; Zehetner J; Wu P; Shah S; Bildzukewicz N; Lipham JC
    J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Jul; 221(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 26095560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Charges, outcomes, and complications: a comparison of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for the treatment of GERD.
    Reynolds JL; Zehetner J; Nieh A; Bildzukewicz N; Sandhu K; Katkhouda N; Lipham JC
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3225-30. PubMed ID: 26541730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and pooled analysis.
    Guidozzi N; Wiggins T; Ahmed AR; Hanna GB; Markar SR
    Dis Esophagus; 2019 Nov; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 31069388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative outcomes of Toupet fundoplication and magnetic sphincter augmentation.
    Asti E; Milito P; Froiio C; Milani V; Bonavina L
    Dis Esophagus; 2023 Jun; 36(Supplement_1):. PubMed ID: 36544397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Revaluation of the efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease.
    Zhang H; Dong D; Liu Z; He S; Hu L; Lv Y
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3684-90. PubMed ID: 26659236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) after magnetic sphincter augmentation (LINX®) compared to fundoplication.
    Wu H; Attaar M; Wong HJ; Campbell M; Kuchta K; Denham W; Linn J; Ujiki MB
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7709-7716. PubMed ID: 35169878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Removal of the magnetic sphincter augmentation device: an assessment of etiology, clinical presentation, and management.
    Eriksson S; Schwameis K; Ayazi S; Hoppo T; Zheng P; Jobe BA
    Surg Endosc; 2023 May; 37(5):3769-3779. PubMed ID: 36689039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multi-institutional outcomes using magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease.
    Warren HF; Reynolds JL; Lipham JC; Zehetner J; Bildzukewicz NA; Taiganides PA; Mickley J; Aye RW; Farivar AS; Louie BE
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3289-96. PubMed ID: 26541740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes after anti-reflux procedures: Nissen, Toupet, magnetic sphincter augmentation or anti-reflux mucosectomy?
    Callahan ZM; Amundson J; Su B; Kuchta K; Ujiki M
    Surg Endosc; 2023 May; 37(5):3944-3951. PubMed ID: 35999311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation and Postoperative Dysphagia: Characterization, Clinical Risk Factors, and Management.
    Ayazi S; Zheng P; Zaidi AH; Chovanec K; Chowdhury N; Salvitti M; Komatsu Y; Omstead AN; Hoppo T; Jobe BA
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2020 Jan; 24(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 31388888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. One hundred consecutive patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: 6 years of clinical experience from a single center.
    Bonavina L; Saino G; Bona D; Sironi A; Lazzari V
    J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Oct; 217(4):577-85. PubMed ID: 23856355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Preliminary results of Chinese magnetic sphincter augmentation in treating gastroesophageal reflux disease].
    Sun YF; Jiang HY; Gu HY; He Y; Yang Y; Zhang XB; Yang Y; Hua R; Guo XF; Ye B; Mao T; Li ZG
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 58(9):691-696. PubMed ID: 32878416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Need for frequent dilations after magnetic sphincter augmentation: an assessment of associated factors and outcomes.
    Sarici IS; Eriksson SE; Zheng P; Hoppo T; Jobe BA; Ayazi S
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):7159-7169. PubMed ID: 37336846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MAGNETIC SPHINCTER AUGMENTATION DEVICE FOR GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE: EFFECTIVE, BUT POSTOPERATIVE DYSPHAGIA AND RISK OF EROSION SHOULD NOT BE UNDERESTIMATED. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.
    Valinoti AC; Angeramo CA; Dreifuss N; Herbella FAM; Schlottmann F
    Arq Bras Cir Dig; 2024; 36():e1781. PubMed ID: 38451590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Application of magnetic sphincter augmentation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease].
    Li ZG
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 58(9):683-686. PubMed ID: 32878414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.