These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36586840)

  • 1. Comparison of ideal mask-based speech enhancement algorithms for speech mixed with white noise at low mixture signal-to-noise ratios.
    Graetzer S; Hopkins C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Dec; 152(6):3458. PubMed ID: 36586840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intelligibility prediction for speech mixed with white Gaussian noise at low signal-to-noise ratios.
    Graetzer S; Hopkins C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Feb; 149(2):1346. PubMed ID: 33639794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Evaluation of Output Signal to Noise Ratio as a Predictor of Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility.
    Watkins GD; Swanson BA; Suaning GJ
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):958-968. PubMed ID: 29474218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of binary mask patterns in automatic speech recognition in background noise.
    Narayanan A; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3083-93. PubMed ID: 23654411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech intelligibility in reverberation with ideal binary masking: effects of early reflections and signal-to-noise ratio threshold.
    Roman N; Woodruff J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1707-17. PubMed ID: 23464040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improvement of intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech by adding background noise.
    Cao S; Li L; Wu X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2227-36. PubMed ID: 21476677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An ideal quantized mask to increase intelligibility and quality of speech in noise.
    Healy EW; Vasko JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Sep; 144(3):1392. PubMed ID: 30424638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of mask pattern in intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech.
    Kjems U; Boldt JB; Pedersen MS; Lunner T; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1415-26. PubMed ID: 19739755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcome measures based on classification performance fail to predict the intelligibility of binary-masked speech.
    Kressner AA; May T; Rozell CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):3033. PubMed ID: 27369123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recognition of speech in noise after application of time-frequency masks: dependence on frequency and threshold parameters.
    Sinex DG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2390-6. PubMed ID: 23556604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: implications for noise reduction.
    Li N; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1673-82. PubMed ID: 18345855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of the division between early and late reflections on intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech.
    Li J; Xia R; Fang Q; Li A; Pan J; Yan Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2801-10. PubMed ID: 25994708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of spectral resolution on the intelligibility of ideal binary masked speech.
    Li N; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):EL59-64. PubMed ID: 18396922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intelligibility of reverberant noisy speech with ideal binary masking.
    Roman N; Woodruff J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2153-61. PubMed ID: 21973369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech Intelligibility for Target and Masker with Different Spectra.
    Leclère T; Théry D; Lavandier M; Culling JF
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():257-266. PubMed ID: 27080666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
    Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the importance of time-frequency contributions to speech intelligibility in noise.
    Yu C; Wójcicki KK; Loizou PC; Hansen JH; Johnson MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 May; 135(5):3007-16. PubMed ID: 24815280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An algorithm that improves speech intelligibility in noise for normal-hearing listeners.
    Kim G; Lu Y; Hu Y; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1486-94. PubMed ID: 19739761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.